Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0266
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0266
A Multi-Objective Optimization and Superstructure-Based Decision-Support Tool for Regional Low-Carbon Hydrogen Roadmaps: Methodology and Application to a region of Spain
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Decarbonization of hydrogen-intensive industrial clusters is essential to meet the European Union's net-zero targets. Although hydrogen can replace fossil-based feedstocks and fuels in refineries and chemical industries, its production remains largely dependent on natural gas. Therefore, cost-effective and low-emission supply routes require a system-level approach that integrates regional resources, technologies, and industrial demand. This study applies a multi-objective optimization framework to design a low-carbon hydrogen supply system for Galicia (northwestern Spain), addressing two gaps in regional energy system modeling: model transferability across regions and integration of social criteria beyond techno-economic assessment. The model quantifies trade-offs between total system cost and greenhouse gas emissions, and an employment indicator is integrated via post-processing using TOPSIS. The results show that meeting 100% of the projected 2030 demand (105 kt H2/a) yields a single feasibility-limited solution dominated by biomass gasification (69% of hydrogen production). When the demand was reduced to 60% coverage (63 kt H2/a), 28 non-dominated solutions were obtained. The top-ranked compromise combines 55% PEM electrolysis and 45% biomass gasification, supported by a wind-dominated electricity mix, under equal weighting of economic, environmental, and social criteria. When either emissions or employment is prioritized, this compromise remains top-ranked, while the cost prioritization shifts preference to a solution with hydrogen production from PEM (51%) and alkaline (3%) electrolysis and biomass gasification (46%).
Suggested Citation
Moreno S, Aragón-García A, Villanueva-Perales ÁL, Alonso-Fariñas B, Haro P. A Multi-Objective Optimization and Superstructure-Based Decision-Support Tool for Regional Low-Carbon Hydrogen Roadmaps: Methodology and Application to a region of Spain. Systems and Control Transactions 5:507-513 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.112184
Author Affiliations
Moreno S: Universidad de Sevilla, Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Seville, Spain. Biorefinery Research Institute (I3B), Jaen, Spain [ORCID]
Aragón-García A: Universidad de Sevilla, Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Seville, Spain [ORCID]
Villanueva-Perales ÁL: Universidad de Sevilla, Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Seville, Spain. Biorefinery Research Institute (I3B), Jaen, Spain [ORCID]
Alonso-Fariñas B: Universidad de Sevilla, Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Seville, Spain. Biorefinery Research Institute (I3B), Jaen, Spain [ORCID]
Haro P: Universidad de Sevilla, Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Seville, Spain. Biorefinery Research Institute (I3B), Jaen, Spain. Universidad de Sevilla, Laboratory of Engineering for Energy and Environmental Sustainability, Seville, Spain [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
507
Last Page
513
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0507-0513-602-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0266
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.112184
Publisher Version
Document

LAPSE:2026.0033
Supplementary Material for: A Multi...
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
14
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0266
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
Supplementary Material
References Cited
  1. European Commission: Hydrogen. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/eus-energy-system/hydrogen_en
  2. International Energy Agency: The Future of Hydrogen. (2019). https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-hydrogen
  3. European Hydrogen Observatory: The European hydrogen market landscape. (2024). https://observatory.clean-hydrogen.europa.eu/
  4. Iea: Global Hydrogen Review 2025. (2025). www.iea.org
  5. Maniscalco MP, Longo S, Cellura M, Miccichè G, Ferraro M. Critical review of life cycle assessment of hydrogen production pathways. Environments 11:108 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11060108
  6. Bolz S, Thiele J, Wendler T. Regional capabilities and hydrogen adoption barriers. Energy Policy 185:113934 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113934
  7. Andersen, C.: Changing perspectives: Assessing regional potentials for green hydrogen infrastructure planning. AESOP Annual Congress proceedings. 36, (2024). https://proceedings.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/aesopro/article/view/2362
  8. Pinotti G, Vence X. Hidrógeno verde y descarbonización en galicia: análisis multinivel de proyectos, motores y barreras para su desarrollo. RGE : (2025) https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.34.3.10430
  9. Balsa Barreiro, J., Lois González, R.C., Miramontes Carballada, Á., Santana Rodrígues, A.P.: Galicia, https://atlasnacional.ign.es/wane/Galicia
  10. Moreno-Benito M, Agnolucci P, Papageorgiou LG. Towards a sustainable hydrogen economy: optimisation-based framework for hydrogen infrastructure development. Computers & Chemical Engineering 102:110-127 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.08.005
  11. Quarton CJ, Samsatli S. The value of hydrogen and carbon capture, storage and utilisation in decarbonising energy: insights from integrated value chain optimisation. Applied Energy 257:113936 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113936
  12. Riera JA, Lima RM, Knio OM. A review of hydrogen production and supply chain modeling and optimization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 48:13731-13755 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.242
  13. Fodstad M, Crespo del Granado P, Hellemo L, Knudsen BR, Pisciella P, Silvast A, Bordin C, Schmidt S, Straus J. Next frontiers in energy system modelling: a review on challenges and the state of the art. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 160:112246 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112246
  14. Oliveira VESF, do Carmo BBT, da Costa Fontes FF. Hydrogen supply chains: modeling challenges and sustainability gaps. Applied Energy 401:126827 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126827
  15. Kachirayil, F., Weinand, J.M., Scheller, F., McKenna, R.: Reviewing local and integrated energy system models: insights into flexibility and robustness challenges. (2022). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.13942
  16. Moreno, S., Aragón-García, A., Villanueva-Perales, A.L., Alonso-Fariñas, B., Monaghan, R.F.D., Haro, P.: Multi-Objective Decision-Support Framework for Low-Carbon Hydrogen Supply Chains under Economic, Environmental, and Regulatory Constraints. SSRN Electronic Journal. WPS 6163626 (2026). https://ssrn.com/abstract=6163626
  17. Pfenninger S, Staffell I. Long-term patterns of european PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data. Energy 114:1251-1265 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.060
  18. Staffell I, Pfenninger S. Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output. Energy 114:1224-1239 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068
  19. Servizo de Planificación e Programación Hidrolóxica-Augas de Galicia: Plan hidrolóxico da demarcación hidrográfica de Galicia-Costa (Ciclo 2021-2027). (2023). https://augasdegalicia.xunta.gal/c/document_library/get_file?file_path=/portal-augas-de-galicia/plans/planHidroloxicoGC/2021_2027/Anexo_03_Usos_DD_gal.pdf
  20. Mavrotas G. Effective implementation of the ?-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation 213:455-465 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037
  21. Moreno S, Van den Auwelant E, Haro P, Alonso-Fariñas B. A conceptual framework for integrating social, economic, and environmental dimensions in the selection of hydrogen production pathways. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 230:116716 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2026.116716
  22. Yoon K. A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions. Journal of the Operational Research Society 38:277-286 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1987.44
  23. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. 186, (1981) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
  24. Papathanasiou J, Ploskas N. TOPSIS. Springer Optimization and Its Applications :1-30 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91648-4_1
(0.09 seconds)

[0.09 s]