Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0407v1
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0407v1
Model verification and Uncertainty Quantification methods using the CCSI simulation model for CO2 capture
Jessica V. Scheffer, Serena Delgado, Olivier Authier, Valentin Loubière, Franchine Ni, Christophe Castel, Jean-Marc Commenge
June 12, 2026
Abstract
This work aims at verifying the CO2 absorption capture model using monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent developed by the U.S. DOE's Carbon Capture Simulation Initiative (CCSI) and performing uncertainty propagation of mass transfer, liquid hold-up and reaction kinetics properties in the complete model, which includes absorber and stripper columns. The verification of the Aspen Plus CCSI model, based on pilot plant data from the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) for a CO2 flue gas concentration between 7 and 11% (mol) allowed uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis for four different selected operational points using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), where low liquid mass transfer parameters exhibited an impact on calculation convergence. Gaussian Processes (GP) surrogate model was implemented, followed by a sensitivity analysis in order to correlate the most sensitive parameters with studied outputs.
Suggested Citation
Scheffer JV, Delgado S, Authier O, Loubière V, Ni F, Castel C, Commenge J. Model verification and Uncertainty Quantification methods using the CCSI simulation model for CO2 capture. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1626-1633 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.144147
Author Affiliations
Scheffer JV: EDF R&D, Chatou, France. Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, F-54000 Nancy, France
Delgado S: EDF R&D, Chatou, France
Authier O: EDF R&D, Chatou, France
Loubière V: EDF R&D, Chatou, France
Ni F: EDF R&D, Chatou, France
Castel C: Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, F-54000 Nancy, France
Commenge J: Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, F-54000 Nancy, France
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1626
Last Page
1633
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1626-1633-219-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0407v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.144147
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
273
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0407v1
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. IEA, Paris. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
  2. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2020). CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions. IEA, Paris. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/ccus-in-clean-energy-transitions
  3. Morgan, Joshua Cole, "Physical Property Modeling of Solvent-Based Carbon Capture Processes with Uncertainty Quantification and Validation with Pilot Plant Data" (2017). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6262/
  4. Soares Chinen, Anderson, "Development of Hydraulic Models, Mass Transfer Models, and Dynamic Models of Solvent-Based Carbon Capture Processes with Uncertainty Quantification and Validation with Pilot Plant Data" (2018). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6685/
  5. Carbon Capture Simulation Initiative (CCSI), MEA Steady State Model, version 3.2.1, GitHub, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/CCSI-Toolset/MEA_ssm/releases/tag/3.2.1
  6. Morgan, J.C. et al. (2018) 'Development of a Rigorous Modeling Framework for Solvent-Based CO2 Capture. Part 2 : Steady-State Validation and Uncertainty Quantification with Pilot Plant Data', Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(31), p. 1046410481 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01472
  7. Morgan JC, Chinen AS, Anderson-Cook C, Tong C, Carroll J, Saha C, Omell B, Bhattacharyya D, Matuszewski M, Bhat KS, Miller DC. Development of a framework for sequential bayesian design of experiments: application to a pilot-scale solvent-based CO2 capture process. Applied Energy 262:114533 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114533
  8. Kuncheekanna VN, Jakobsen JP. Exploring global uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis methodologies: CO2 capture absorber model with MEA solvent as a test case. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 200:107-133 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.09.030
  9. Song , Seibert AF, Rochelle GT. Mass transfer parameters for packings: effect of viscosity. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57:718-729 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04396
  10. Tsai RE, Seibert AF, Eldridge RB, Rochelle GT. A dimensionless model for predicting the mass?transfer area of structured packing. AIChE Journal 57:1173-1184 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.12345
  11. Aboudheir A, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Chakma A, Idem R. Kinetics of the reactive absorption of carbon dioxide in high co2-loaded, concentrated aqueous monoethanolamine solutions. Chemical Engineering Science 58:5195-5210 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2003.08.014
  12. Vaidya PD, Kenig EY. Co2?alkanolamine reaction kinetics: a review of recent studies. Chem Eng & Technol 30:1467-1474 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200700268
  13. Knuutila H, Juliussen O, Svendsen HF. Kinetics of the reaction of carbon dioxide with aqueous sodium and potassium carbonate solutions. Chemical Engineering Science 65:6077-6088 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.07.018
  14. Gondal S, Svendsen HF, Knuutila HK. Activity based kinetics of CO2-OH? systems with li+, na+ and K+ counter ions. Chemical Engineering Science 151:1-6 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.05.009
  15. Konno H, Koshizuka T. Mean-absolute deviation model. IIE Transactions 37:893-900 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170591007786
  16. Marrel A, Iooss B, Laurent B, Roustant O. Calculations of sobol indices for the gaussian process metamodel. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 94:742-751 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.07.008
  17. Beaume, G. (2009). Modélisation et simulation numérique de l'écoulement d'un fluide complexe (Doctoral thesis). HAL Open Science. https://theses.hal.science/tel-00416435
(0.11 seconds)

[0.11 s]