Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0376
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0376
Process Intensification for LNG Purification: Modeling CO2 Separation in a Rotating Packed Bed
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) plays a strategic role in the global energy transition, as it represents a less carbon-intensive alternative to coal. Separation of CO2 from raw natural gas is a critical step for meeting LNG specifications and enabling Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in offshore fields. However, high CO2 concentrations and formation of a CO2 ethane azeotrope increase the process complexity, often requiring extractive distillation with heavier hydrocarbons. Severe limitations are faced in offshore environments due to their weight, volume and high energy consumption. Due to that, Process Intensification (PI) seeks to enhance heat and mass transfer efficiency, potentially reducing equipment volume and weight. Rotating Packed Beds (RPB) have demonstrated significant potential for intensifying LNG purification by using centrifugal forces to drive liquid through a porous medium in contact with a gas stream. Experimental measurements of total pressure drop, and local liquid holdup are feasible in pilot-scale units, although typically requiring specialized equipment and instrumentation. Consequently, modeling approaches based on mass, momentum, and energy balances have been widely proposed in the literature to estimate the hydrodynamic behavior of RPB systems. While Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models can provide detailed insights into equipment behavior, they are often computationally expensive for parametric studies and design optimization. In this context, this work proposes a one-dimensional model in cylindrical coordinates to analyze fluid flow in an RPB for natural gas/CO2 separation process. The governing equations are formulated and validated against experimental data for pressure drop, interfacial velocity, and liquid holdup along the RPB radius.
Keywords
Suggested Citation
Zerwas AA, Maia BLV, Neto WS, Salihuddin RS, Surmi AB, Rahman FH, Silva JFL, Noriler D. Process Intensification for LNG Purification: Modeling CO2 Separation in a Rotating Packed Bed. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1366-1373 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.146982
Author Affiliations
Zerwas AA: University of Campinas, Department of Process Engineering of the Chemical Engineering Faculty, Campinas, Brazil. University of São Paulo, Department of Chemical Engineering, São Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Maia BLV: University of Campinas, Department of Process Engineering of the Chemical Engineering Faculty, Campinas, Brazil [ORCID]
Neto WS: University of Campinas, Department of Process Engineering of the Chemical Engineering Faculty, Campinas, Brazil [ORCID]
Salihuddin RS: PETRONAS Research Sdn Bhd, Bangi, Malaysia [ORCID]
Surmi AB: PETRONAS Research Sdn Bhd, Bangi, Malaysia [ORCID]
Rahman FH: PETRONAS Research Sdn Bhd, Bangi, Malaysia [ORCID]
Silva JFL: University of Campinas, Department of Process Engineering of the Chemical Engineering Faculty, Campinas, Brazil [ORCID]
Noriler D: University of Campinas, Department of Process Engineering of the Chemical Engineering Faculty, Campinas, Brazil [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1366
Last Page
1373
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1366-1373-560-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0376
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.146982
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
16
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0376
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. ZareNezhad B, Hosseinpour N. An extractive distillation technique for producing CO2 enriched injection gas in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) fields. Energy Conversion and Management 50:1491-1496 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.02.016
  2. Paul EL, Atiemo?Obeng VA, Kresta SM. Handbook of industrial mixing. Wiley (2004) https://doi.org/10.1002/0471451452
  3. Neumann K, Hunold S, Skiborowski M, Górak A. Dry pressure drop in rotating packed beds-systematic experimental studies. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56:12395-12405 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03203
  4. Kelleher T, Fair JR. Distillation studies in a high-gravity contactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35:4646-4655 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie950662a
  5. Garba U, Rouzineau D, Meyer M. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE PRESSURE DROP AND FLOODING IN a ROTATING PACKED BED REACTOR. Malay. J. Catal. 7:42-48 (2023) https://doi.org/10.11113/mjcat.v7n2.174
  6. Burns JR, Jamil JN, Ramshaw C. Process intensification: operating characteristics of rotating packed beds - determination of liquid hold-up for a high-voidage structured packing. Chemical Engineering Science 55:2401-2415 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00520-5
  7. Yang Y, Xiang Y, Chu G, Zou H, Luo Y, Arowo M, Chen JF. A noninvasive x-ray technique for determination of liquid holdup in a rotating packed bed. Chemical Engineering Science 138:244-255 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.07.044
  8. Joel AS, Wang M, Ramshaw C, Oko E. Modelling, simulation and analysis of intensified regenerator for solvent based carbon capture using rotating packed bed technology. Applied Energy 203:11-25 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.157
  9. Guo F, Zheng C, Guo K, Feng Y, Gardner NC. Hydrodynamics and mass transfer in cross-flow rotating packed bed. Chemical Engineering Science 52:3853-3859 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(97)00229-7
  10. Lin CC, Chen YS, Liu HS. Prediction of liquid holdup in countercurrent-flow rotating packed bed. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 78:397-403 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1205/026387600527293
  11. Iliuta I, Petre CF, Larachi F. Hydrodynamic continuum model for two-phase flow structured-packing-containing columns. Chemical Engineering Science 59:879-888 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2003.11.020
  12. Chandra A, Goswami PS, Rao DP. Characteristics of flow in a rotating packed bed (HIGEE) with split packing. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44:4051-4060 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie048815u
  13. Qammar H, G?adyszewski K, Górak A, Skiborowski M. Towards the development of advanced packing design for distillation in rotating packed beds. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 91:1663-1673 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201900053
  14. Wen ZN, Wu W, Luo Y, Zhang LL, Sun BC, Chu GW. Novel wire mesh packing with controllable cross-sectional area in a rotating packed bed: mass transfer studies. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59:16043-16051 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01886
  15. Zawadzki D, Majdzik M, Pi?tkowski M, Jaskulski M, Blatkiewicz M. Prototyping of rotating packed bed structural internals. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 196:109678 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2024.109678
  16. Martínez EL, Jaimes R, Gomez JL, Filho RM (2012): CFD Simulation of Three-Dimensional Multiphase Flow in a Rotating Packed Bed. In: Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Bogle IDL and Fairweather M, eds. Elsevier, pp. 1158-1162
  17. Llerena-Chavez H, Larachi F. Analysis of flow in rotating packed beds via CFD simulations-dry pressure drop and gas flow maldistribution. Chemical Engineering Science 64:2113-2126 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.01.019
  18. Lu X, Xie P, Ingham DB, Ma L, Pourkashanian M. Modelling of CO2 absorption in a rotating packed bed using an eulerian porous media approach. Chemical Engineering Science 199:302-318 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.01.029
  19. Lukin I, G?adyszewski K, Skiborowski M, Górak A, Schembecker G. Aroma absorption in a rotating packed bed with a tailor-made archimedean spiral packing. Chemical Engineering Science 231:116334 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.116334
  20. Attou A, Boyer C, Ferschneider G. Modelling of the hydrodynamics of the cocurrent gas-liquid trickle flow through a trickle-bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Science 54:785-802 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(98)00285-1
  21. Attou A, Ferschneider G. A two-fluid hydrodynamic model for the transition between trickle and pulse flow in a cocurrent gas-liquid packed-bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Science 55:491-511 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00344-9
  22. Lappalainen K, Alopaeus V, Manninen M, Aittamaa J. Improved hydrodynamic model for wetting efficiency, pressure drop, and liquid holdup in trickle-bed reactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47:8436-8444 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie8003754
  23. Lu X, Xie P, Ingham DB, Ma L, Pourkashanian M. A porous media model for CFD simulations of gas-liquid two-phase flow in rotating packed beds. Chemical Engineering Science 189:123-134 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.04.074
  24. Ko?odziej A, ?ojewska J. Experimental and modelling study on flow resistance of wire gauzes. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 48:816-822 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2008.10.009
  25. Onda K, Takeuchi H, Okumoto Y. Mass Transfer Coefficients between Gas and Liquid Phases in Packed Columns. J Chem Eng Jpn 1:56-62 (1968) https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.1.56
  26. Sandilya P, Rao DP, Sharma A, Biswas G. Gas-phase mass transfer in a centrifugal contactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40:384-392 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0000818
  27. Lu X, Xie P, Ingham DB, Ma L, Pourkashanian M. A porous media model for CFD simulations of gas-liquid two-phase flow in rotating packed beds. Chemical Engineering Science 189:123-134 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.04.074
  28. Burns JR, Ramshaw C. Process intensification: visual study of liquid maldistribution in rotating packed beds. Chemical Engineering Science 51:1347-1352 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(95)00367-3
(0.09 seconds)

[0.09 s]