Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0352v1
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0352v1
Energy Integration Via Heat Pump in a Simulated Fluidized TSA Column for CO2 Capture from Biomass-Derived Flue Gases
June 12, 2026
Abstract
We present a steady-state, optimization-based techno-economic study of a continuous fluidized temperature-swing adsorption (TSA) system for post-combustion CO2 capture from biomass-derived flue gas, using two adsorption stages and one desorption stage with integrated heat-pump thermal management. The GAMS/CONOPT4 model couples molar and energy balances, Toth adsorption equilibrium, fluidized-bed hydrodynamics and literature cost correlations. Optimization yields CO2 purity of 96% v/v and 95.5% recovery at low, safe pressures with particle Reynolds numbers of 2-11, indicating near-minimum-fluidization operation. The nominal capture cost is 87 USD/tonCO2 with an internal rate of return of 42%; utilities comprise 49% of annualized costs and the adsorption compressor dominates equipment capital. Disabling the heat pump increases modeled capture cost to 124 USD/tonCO2, highlighting the heat pump's decisive role in reducing energy demand and costs. Adding adsorption stages lowers modeled cost further but produces impractically shallow beds, revealing a trade-off between mass-transfer performance and feasible bed geometry. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated a linear positive correlation between electricity cost and capture cost, with capture costs potentially as low as 50 USD/tonCO2 and an internal rate of return as high as 64%. While results demonstrate the technical and economic plausibility of a heat-pump-assisted fluidized TSA under the stated assumptions, the study recommends including flue contaminants, refined heat-exchanger and pressure-drop models, and experimental validation for scale-up.
Keywords
Suggested Citation
Funcia ES, Beleli YS, Vilarrasa-Garcia E, Seckler MM, Paiva JL, Roux GACL. Energy Integration Via Heat Pump in a Simulated Fluidized TSA Column for CO2 Capture from Biomass-Derived Flue Gases. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1183-1188 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.165329
Author Affiliations
Funcia ES: University of Sao Paulo, Polytechnic School, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Beleli YS: University of Sao Paulo, Polytechnic School, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Vilarrasa-Garcia E: Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil [ORCID]
Seckler MM: University of Sao Paulo, Polytechnic School, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Paiva JL: University of Sao Paulo, Polytechnic School, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Roux GACL: University of Sao Paulo, Polytechnic School, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1183
Last Page
1188
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1183-1188-294-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0352v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.165329
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
50
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0352v1
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change secretariat. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
  2. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/commentaries/is-carbon-capture-too-expensive
  3. Sadr M, Esmaeili Aliabadi D, Jordan M, Thrän D. A bottom-up regional potential assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in germany. Environ. Res. Lett. 19:114047 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad7edd
  4. Patange OS, Garg A, Jayaswal S. An integrated bottom-up optimization to investigate the role of BECCS in transitioning towards a net-zero energy system: a case study from gujarat, india. Energy 255:124508 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124508
  5. Beleli YS, Paiva JL, Seckler MM, Le Roux GAC. Optimization of a continuous multi-stage fluidized bed system for CO2 capture utilizing temperature swing adsorption. Comp Aided Chem Eng 52:3233-3238 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15274-0.50515-1
  6. Prado DS, Vilarrasa-García E, Sampronha E, Beleli YS, Moreira FS, Paiva JL, Roux GACL, Bastos-Neto M, Azevedo DCS, Silva ECN, Seckler MM. Multiple approaches for large-scale CO2 capture by adsorption with 13X zeolite in multi-stage fluidized beds assessment. Adsorption 30:429-455 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-023-00422-x
  7. Funcia ES, Beleli YS, Vilarrasa-Garcia E, Seckler MM, Le Roux GAC. Design of a fluidized temperature swing adsorption process for biomass-derived flue gas carbon capture. Computers & Chemical Engineering 202:109280 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109280
  8. Gao J, Hoshino Y, Inoue G. Honeycomb-carbon-fiber-supported amine-containing nanogel particles for CO2 capture using a rotating column TVSA. Chemical Engineering Journal 383:123123 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123123
  9. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
  10. Brandl P, Bui M, Hallett JP, Mac Dowell N. Beyond 90% capture: possible, but at what cost?. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 105:103239 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103239
  11. Biegler LT, Grossmann IE, Westerberg AW. Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design. Prentice Hall (1997).
  12. Wright DG, Woods DR. Evaluation of capital cost data. part 7: liquid waste disposal with emphasis on physical treatment. Can J Chem Eng 71:575-590 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450710411
  13. Camaraza-Medina Y, Sánchez-Escalona A, Retirado-Mediaceja Y, García-Morales O. Use of air cooled condenser in biomass power plants: a case study in cuba. IJHT 38:425-431 (2020) https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.380218
  14. Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. McGraw Hill (1991).
  15. Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA, Bhattacharyya D. Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes. Prentice Hall (2012).
  16. Bureau of Labor Statistics, USA government. https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl
  17. Congressional Research Service, USA government. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11455
  18. Douglas JM. Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes. McGraw Hill (1988).
  19. Do DD. Adsorption Analysis: Equilibria and Kinetics. Imperial College Press (1998).
  20. Research Center for Greenhouse Gas Innovation. Book of Abstracts: Energy Transition Research & Innovation Conference - ETRI 2024 528:532 (2024) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17179238
  21. Zuberi MJS, Hasanbeigi A, Morrow W. Techno-economic evaluation of industrial heat pump applications in US pulp and paper, textile, and automotive industries. Energy Efficiency 16: (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-023-10089-6
  22. GAMS Software GmbH. https://www.gams.com/46/docs/S_CONOPT4.html
  23. GAMS Software GmbH. https://www.gams.com/latest/docs/UG_NLP_GoodFormulations.html
  24. Tallmadge JA. Unit operations of chemical engineering. warren L. mccabe and julian C. smith. mcgraw?hill book company, inc., new yark (1956). 945 pages. $10.50. AIChE Journal 3: (2004) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690030126
  25. Gabelman A. Adsorption Basics: Part 1. American Institute of Chemical Engineers (2017) https://www.aiche.org/sites/default/files/docs/pages/adsorption_basics_part_1.pdf
(0.11 seconds)

[0.11 s]