LAPSE:2026.0213
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0213
Advancing Circularity in Biopharma: Leveraging Industrial Symbiosis for Resource Efficiency
June 12, 2026
Abstract
The biopharmaceutical sector has traditionally focused on cost-efficient process design and capacity planning to meet rising demand. Recently, sustainability pressures have increased, driving efforts to reduce the environmental footprint of manufacturing and supply chains; however, strict quality and sterilization requirements can limit the implementation of fully circular resource-use strategies. In this space, adopting an industrial-cluster systems view could unlock opportunities to improve sustainability of industrial clusters through coordinated material and energy exchange, supporting resource efficiency at cluster level and still meet sector-specific quality/sterilization requirements. In this work, we present life cycle assessment (LCA)-based comparative analyses to investigate the potential of industrial symbiosis within monoclonal antibody (mAb) manufacturing, whereby LCA process models are based on comprehensive techno-economic analyses that quantify resource inputs and waste streams. The presented results discuss impact reduction pathways including integrating renewable wind-based electricity, low-grade waste heat use, heat recovery through incineration and mechanical recycling of single-use plastics. The compound reductions of industrial symbiosis and energy source decarbonization are estimated, corresponding to 75% reductions in GWP potential, 70% in fossil resource scarcity and 60% in water use, thus highlighting the benefit of adopting a large-scale system view rather than siloed approaches.
The biopharmaceutical sector has traditionally focused on cost-efficient process design and capacity planning to meet rising demand. Recently, sustainability pressures have increased, driving efforts to reduce the environmental footprint of manufacturing and supply chains; however, strict quality and sterilization requirements can limit the implementation of fully circular resource-use strategies. In this space, adopting an industrial-cluster systems view could unlock opportunities to improve sustainability of industrial clusters through coordinated material and energy exchange, supporting resource efficiency at cluster level and still meet sector-specific quality/sterilization requirements. In this work, we present life cycle assessment (LCA)-based comparative analyses to investigate the potential of industrial symbiosis within monoclonal antibody (mAb) manufacturing, whereby LCA process models are based on comprehensive techno-economic analyses that quantify resource inputs and waste streams. The presented results discuss impact reduction pathways including integrating renewable wind-based electricity, low-grade waste heat use, heat recovery through incineration and mechanical recycling of single-use plastics. The compound reductions of industrial symbiosis and energy source decarbonization are estimated, corresponding to 75% reductions in GWP potential, 70% in fossil resource scarcity and 60% in water use, thus highlighting the benefit of adopting a large-scale system view rather than siloed approaches.
Record ID
Keywords
Subject
Suggested Citation
Sarkis M, Bernardi A, Kontoravdi C, Papathanasiou MM. Advancing Circularity in Biopharma: Leveraging Industrial Symbiosis for Resource Efficiency. Systems and Control Transactions 5:94-99 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.106682
Author Affiliations
Sarkis M: Texas A&M Energy Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, United States
Bernardi A: The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom. Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom
Kontoravdi C: The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom. Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom
Papathanasiou MM: The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom. Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Bernardi A: The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom. Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom
Kontoravdi C: The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom. Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom
Papathanasiou MM: The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom. Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, United Kingdom
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
94
Last Page
99
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0094-0099-281-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0213
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.106682
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
43
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0213
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Pietrzykowski M, Flanagan W, Pizzi V, Brown A, Sinclair A, Monge M. An environmental life cycle assessment comparison of single-use and conventional process technology for the production of monoclonal antibodies. Journal of Cleaner Production 41:150-162 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.048
- Budzinski K, Constable D, D'Aquila D, Smith P, Madabhushi SR, Whiting A, Costelloe T, Collins M. Streamlined life cycle assessment of single use technologies in biopharmaceutical manufacture. New Biotechnology 68:28-36 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2022.01.002
- Sarkis M, Monteiro M, Bernardi A, Chiplunkar R, Kontoravdi C, Papathanasiou MM. Sustainable by design: a first attempt on bioprocessing. Computers & Chemical Engineering 205:109454 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109454
- ISO, ISO 14040:2006(En), Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework: Technical report, International Organisation for Standardization (2006)
- Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218-1230 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
- Ruggeri M, Savastano M, Rizzi A, Veronesi A, Vinci G. Life cycle assessment of post-industrial plastics mechanical recycling. a case study from italy. Science of The Total Environment 998:180246 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180246
- Tonsi G, Caccia M, Maesani C, Simon Ostan P, Ortenzi MA, Alini S, Pirola C. Polyamide recycling by selective dissolution approach: life cycle assessment study and environmental impacts comparison with different recycling technologies. Polymer Engineering & Sci 65:765-782 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.27041
- Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M, Zijp M, Hollander A, van Zelm R. Recipe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:138-147 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y
- Boulay AM, Bare J, Benini L, Berger M, Lathuillière MJ, Manzardo A, Margini M, Motoshita M, Núñez M, Pastor AV, Ridoutt B, Oki T, Worbe S, Pfister S, The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE), Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 23: 368-378 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s1137-017-1333-8
- Schade A, Melzer M, Zimmermann S, Schwarz T, Stoewe K, Kuhn H. Plastic waste recycling?a chemical recycling perspective. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 12:12270-12288 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c02551
(0.09 seconds)
[0.09 s]

