Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0533
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0533
The Imperial College Integrated Design Project
June 12, 2026
Abstract
The Imperial College Integrated Design Project reframes the chemical engineering capstone as a structured educational journey that develops professional competence rather than simply delivering a final technical report. The programme is grounded in four pedagogical pillars-authenticity, integration, impact, and reflection-which align with the graduate attributes required by the Institution of Chemical Engineers. Authenticity is achieved through open-ended problems drawn from industrial partners and emerging research needs; integration connects knowledge from across the curriculum into a coherent systems perspective; impact emphasises user-centred, sustainable solutions; and reflection cultivates metacognitive awareness of decision making and learning from failure. A mentored-autonomy model supports student teams through weekly checkpoints, skills workshops, and access to disciplinary experts. Assessment deliberately balances artefact quality with evidence of process, rewarding reasoning under uncertainty, ethical judgement, and communication alongside technical performance. Ethics, safety, and sustainability are embedded through lifecycle analysis and HAZOP requirements rather than treated as add-ons. The four-phase structure-scoping, feasibility, detailed design, and deployment-scaffolds increasing complexity while maintaining measurable progress and accountability. A 2024 project on renewable-powered green ammonia illustrates how students integrate decision-making methods, simulation tools, and stakeholder negotiation within a realistic professional context. Educational outcomes include strengthened systems thinking, collaboration, project leadership, and the ability to justify design choices in social and environmental terms. Institutional benefits include deeper industry engagement and improved graduate readiness. The paper argues that capstones should be judged by the quality of learning processes as much as by final designs, and that this model produces reflective engineers equipped for interdisciplinary practice and responsible innovation.
Suggested Citation
Fennell PS, Hellgardt K, Lewin DR. The Imperial College Integrated Design Project. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2631-2637 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.182063
Author Affiliations
Fennell PS: Chemical Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK. [ORCID]
Hellgardt K: Chemical Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK. [ORCID]
Lewin DR: Chemical Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2631
Last Page
2637
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2631-2637-123-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0533
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.182063
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
8
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0533
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Project Management - This emerged as one of the top challenges, with an average rank of 3.03. A significant number of students (28) selected project management as their most challenging area, indicating concerns about planning, organizing tasks, and meeting deadlines. This is consistent with the students' perception of their weakest ability, being leadership of team discussions.
  2. Lewin DR, Adams II TA, Bongartz D, Léonard G, Suffix AB Jr, Mansouri SS, Martins FG, Mujtaba II and Zondervan E. Teaching process design - Quo vadis? Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 53:3505-3510 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50585-8
  3. Silverstein DL, Bullard LG, Seider WD, and Vigeant MA. How We Teach: Capstone Design, presented at 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. (2013). https://peer.asee.org/19689I
  4. Kiss AA, Grievink J. Process systems engineering developments in europe from an industrial and academic perspective. Computers & Chemical Engineering 138:106823 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106823
  5. Torres AI, Grossmann IE. Teaching of process design courses ? the CMU experience, trends and challenges. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2242-2246 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.101971
  6. Dumont MN, Foy MP, L?onard G. Integrated project in the master of chemical engineering and materials science at the university of li?ge. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2247-2252 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.132784
  7. Seider WD, Lewin DR, Seader JD, Widagdo S, Gani R, and Ng KM. Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis and Evaluation, 4th Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY (2017).
(0.09 seconds)

[0.09 s]