Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0236
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0236
Net Carbon Balance (NCB): a Better Way to Evaluate and Optimize Carbon Capture Technologies
André F. Young, Aline R. Eckstein, Leonardo D. Ferreira, Vítor M. Sermoud, Ingrid A. de Oliveira
June 12, 2026
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to present a single equation format for quantifying the net carbon balance (NCB) in the evaluation of CO2 capture technologies, and to discuss the benefits of this approach. The equation must take into account indirect emissions, especially the contributions from utility generation systems (heating, cooling and electricity), making use of efficiency values and emission factors. The idea is to synthesize, in a single expression, the quantification of the environmental footprint of a technology, in a practical way so that it could be used as an efficient metric in technical evaluation studies, or as objective function/constraint in optimization problems. It also facilitates demonstrating the relationship between capture efficiency and environmental performance, as well as the contribution of each term to total emissions, and to compare different technologies in terms of time, location and available energy sources. To illustrate the application of the proposed NCB formulation, two processes were compared in two different scenarios: post-combustion and pre-combustion capture with MEA absorption, in a Base Case formulated with literature premises and an NCB Zero Case meaning carbon neutrality. A process simulator - Aspen HYSYS - was used to solve the mass and energy balances associated with each process, providing the necessary information for NCB calculation, whose parameters were obtained from the technical literature and were discussed in relation to their importance to the proposed analysis.
Keywords
Carbon Dioxide, Emissions, Energy Efficiency, Environment, Modelling and Simulations, Process Design
Suggested Citation
Young AF, Eckstein AR, Ferreira LD, Sermoud VM, Oliveira IAD. Net Carbon Balance (NCB): a Better Way to Evaluate and Optimize Carbon Capture Technologies. Systems and Control Transactions 5:274-281 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.188113
Author Affiliations
Young AF: Federal Fluminense University, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [ORCID]
Eckstein AR: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, School of Chemistry, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Ferreira LD: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, School of Chemistry, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Sermoud VM: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, School of Chemistry, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [ORCID]
Oliveira IAD: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, School of Chemistry, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
274
Last Page
281
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0274-0281-98-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0236
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.188113
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
44
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0236
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Moghaddam AH, Esfandyari M, Sakhaeinia H. Optimization of amine-based carbon capture: simulation and energy efficiency analysis of absorption section. Results in Engineering 24:103574 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103574
  2. Meramo-Hurtado SI, Puello P, Cabarcas A. Process analysis of hydrogen production via biomass gasification under computer-aided safety and environmental assessments. ACS Omega 5:19667-19681 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c02344
  3. Shamsi M, Obaid AA, Farokhi S, Bayat A. A novel process simulation model for hydrogen production via reforming of biomass gasification tar. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:772-781 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.055
  4. Cook B, Hagen C. Techno-economic analysis of biomass gasification for hydrogen production in three us-based case studies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 49:202-218 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.219
  5. Turton R, Shaeiwitz J, Bhattacharyya D, Whiting W. Analysis, synthesis, and design of chemical processes. Pearson Education (2018)
  6. Seider WD, Lewin DR, Seader JD, Widagdo S, Gani R, Ng KM. Product and process design principles: synthesis, analysis, and evaluation. John Wiley & Sons (2017)
  7. Ipieca. https://www.ipieca.org/resources/energy-efficiencysolutions/power-recovery-turbines-2013
  8. Caxiano IN, Junqueira PG, Mangili PV, Prata DM. Eco-efficiency analysis and intensification of the acetic acid purification process. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 147:107784 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.107784
  9. Campbell L, Toolen J, Grubert D, Napp G. Compendium of greenhouse gas emissions methodologies for the natural gas and oil industry. American Petroleum Institute (2021)
  10. MCTI - Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/noticias/2024/02/fator-de-emissao-de-co2-na-geracao-de-energia-eletrica-no-brasil-em-2023-e-o-menorem-12-anos
  11. Haynes WM. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press (2016)
  12. Volkers B-D. Carbon dioxide for calcite scale control in cooling water systems. University of Groningen, Netherlands (2016)
(0.08 seconds)

[0.09 s]