Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0541v1
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0541v1
Real-time dynamic optimisation for sustainable biogas production through anaerobic co-digestion with hybrid models
Mohammadamin Zarei, Meshkat Dolat, Rohit Murali, Mengjia Zhu, Oliver Pennington, Dongda Zhang, Michael Short
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Renewable energy and energy efficiency are increasingly recognised as crucial for creating new economic opportunities and mitigating environmental impacts. Anaerobic digestion (AD) transforms organic materials into a clean, renewable energy source. Co-digestion of various organic wastes and energy crops addresses the disadvantages of single-substrate digestion, increasing production flexibility yet adding process complexity and sensitivity. This study employs a two-pronged approach to optimise biogas production while considering global warming potential: a nonlinear programming (NLP) model for dynamic system economic optimisation with a model predictive control (MPC) strategy for precise temperature regulation within the digester. The NLP model integrates a combined heat and power (CHP) system to leverage dynamic electricity, heat, and gas prices, accounting for physical and economic parameters such as biomethane potential, chemical oxygen demand, and substrate density. A cardinal temperature and pH model ensures accurate depiction of substrate degradation and gas production rates under varying conditions. The MPC scheme, formulated as a system of differential-algebraic equations, offers fine-grained temperature control, capturing real-world complexities like heating/cooling delays, ambient conditions, and multiple feed components with different optimal digestion temperatures. Results demonstrate that this integrated model optimises the interaction between electricity production, biogas generation, and CHP operation for real-time multi-objective optimisation of profit, global warming potential and temperature control. A case study validates the model’s capability for guiding decision-making in biogas facilities, emphasising strategic feedstock management and precise temperature control. Overall, this integrated approach advances the modelling and control of anaerobic co-digestion systems, enhancing both efficiency and profitability in biogas production.
Keywords
Biofuels, Food & Agricultural Processes, Optimization, Process Control, Pyomo
Suggested Citation
Zarei M, Dolat M, Murali R, Zhu M, Pennington O, Zhang D, Short M. Real-time dynamic optimisation for sustainable biogas production through anaerobic co-digestion with hybrid models. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2423-2428 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.130144
Author Affiliations
Zarei M: School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK; Institute for Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Dolat M: School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Murali R: School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Zhu M: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester UK
Pennington O: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester UK
Zhang D: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester UK
Short M: School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK; Institute for Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2423
Last Page
2428
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2423-2428-1615-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0541v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.130144
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
883
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0541v1
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. M. Zarei, A. Cherif, H.-J. Yoon, J. J. Liu, and C.-J. Lee, "Optimal design of a biofuel supply chain using an augmented multi-objective and TOPSIS method," Green Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 4067-4075, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1039/D2GC04670A
  2. M. Dolat et al., "Dynamic feed scheduling for optimised anaerobic digestion: An optimisation approach for better decision-making to enhance revenue and environmental benefits," Digital Chemical Engineering, vol. 13, p. 100191, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2024.100191
  3. T. 'Kunatsa, "Optimisation of Biogas Production from Co-Digestion of Water Hyacinth, Municipal Solid Waste and Cow Dung," UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA, 2021
  4. K. Hagos, J. Zong, D. Li, C. Liu, and X. Lu, "Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 76, pp. 1485-1496, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.184
  5. S. García-Gen, L. O. Santos, and A. Vande Wouwer, "Application of a Nonlinear Model Predictive Controller to the Anaerobic Digestion of Readily Biodegradable Wastes," IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 909-914, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.560
  6. D. He, H. Wang, Y. Tian, N. Christov, and I. Simeonov, "Trajectory tracking of two-stage anaerobic digestion process: A predictive control with guaranteed performance and saturated input, based on ultra-local model," J Process Control, vol. 129, p. 103039, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2023.103039
  7. H. Kil, D. Li, Y. Xi, and J. Li, "Model predictive control with on-line model identification for anaerobic digestion processes," Biochem Eng J, vol. 128, pp. 63-75, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2017.08.004
  8. J. Vasco-Correa, S. Khanal, A. Manandhar, and A. Shah, "Anaerobic digestion for bioenergy production: Global status, environmental and techno-economic implications, and government policies," Bioresour Technol, vol. 247, pp. 1015-1026, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.004
  9. I. Ghosh and R. K. Jana, "Clean energy stock price forecasting and response to macroeconomic variables: A novel framework using Facebook's Prophet, NeuralProphet and explainable AI," Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 200, p. 123148, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123148
  10. R. Zhang et al., "Biogas Beyond Boundaries: Novel Algebraic Equations for Global Warming Standardization in Anaerobic Digestion Systems with Critical Life Cycle Analyses," Available at SSRN 4745165
  11. S. Rossi, D. Carecci, and E. Ficara, "Thermal response analysis and compilation of cardinal temperatures for 424 strains of microalgae, cyanobacteria, diatoms and other species," Science of The Total Environment, vol. 873, p. 162275, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162275
  12. E. Lebon, H. Caillet, E. Akinlabi, D. Madyira, and L. Adelard, "Kinetic study of anaerobic co-digestion, analysis and modelling," Procedia Manuf, vol. 35, pp. 321-326, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.047
  13. A. Garlapati, D. R. Krishna, K. Garlapati, N. m. S. Yaswanth, U. Rahul, and G. Narayanan, "Stock Price Prediction Using Facebook Prophet and Arima Models," in 2021 6th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), 2021, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CT51068.2021.9418057
  14. B. Nunes Silva, V. Cadavez, J. A. Teixeira, M. Ellouze, and U. Gonzales-Barron, "Cardinal parameter meta-regression models describing Listeria monocytogenes growth in broth," Food Research International, vol. 136, p. 109476, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109476
  15. L. Rosso, J. R. Lobry, S. Bajard, and J. P. Flandrois, "Convenient Model To Describe the Combined Effects of Temperature and pH on Microbial Growth," Appl Environ Microbiol, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 610-616, Feb. 1995, https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.2.610-616.1995
  16. "System Average Price (SAP) of Gas," Jan. 2025
  17. "System Price of electricity," Jul. 2024
  18. C. Scheutz and A. M. Fredenslund, "Total methane emission rates and losses from 23 biogas plants," Waste Management, vol. 97, pp. 38-46, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.029