Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0152v1
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0152v1
Numerical Analysis of the Hydrodynamics of Proximity Impellers using the SPH Method
Maria Soledad Hernández-Rivera, Karen Guadalupe Medina-Elizarraraz, Jazmín Cortez-González, Rodolfo Murrieta-Dueñas, Carlos E. Alvarado-Rodríguez, José de Jesús Ramírez-Minguela, Juan Gabriel Segovia Hernández
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Mixing is a critical operation in numerous industrial processes, traditionally performed in agitated tanks to ensure homogenization. Despite its importance, the design of tanks and impellers is often neglected during agitation system selection, resulting in excessive energy consumption and inefficient mixing. To mitigate these challenges, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) serves as a powerful tool for analyzing tank hydrodynamics and quantifying mixing times. CFD employs mathematical models to simulate mass, heat, and momentum transport phenomena within fluid systems. Among the latest advancements in modeling stirred tank hydrodynamics is Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), a mesh-free Lagrangian approach that tracks individual particles characterized by properties such as mass, position, velocity, and pressure. SPH provides significant advantages over traditional mesh-based methods by accurately capturing fluid behavior through particle interactions. In this study, the performance of three impellers—double ribbon, paravisc, and hybrid—was evaluated based on hydrodynamics and mixing times during the homogenization of water and ethanol in a 0.5 L stirred tank. The tank and impellers were meticulously designed, operating at 70% capacity, with the fluids exhibiting the following rheological properties: ?1 = 1000 kg/m³, ?2 = 789 kg/m³, µ1 = 1E-6 m²/s, and µ2 = 1.52E-6 m²/s. The simulations were conducted under turbulent flow conditions (Reynolds number of 10,000) for a duration of 2 minutes using the DualSPHysics software. The stirring speed was set at 34 rpm, and the initial particle spacing was configured to 1 mm, generating 270,232 fluid particles and 187,512 boundary particles representing the tank and agitator. The analysis included velocity profiles, flow patterns, vorticity, divergence, and density fields to assess mixing performance. The Q-criterion was employed to discern the dominance of rotational or deformational motion and to identify stagnation zones. The results revealed that the double ribbon impeller exhibited superior performance, achieving 88.28% mixing within approximately 100 seconds, while the paravisc and hybrid impellers reached mixing efficiencies of 12.36% and 11.8%, respectively. These findings underscore the potential of SPH as a robust computational approach for linking hydrodynamic behavior with mixing efficiency and identifying key parameters to optimize mixing processes.
Keywords
Computational Fluid Dynamics, homogenization, hydrodynamics, Proximity impellers, SPH
Suggested Citation
Hernández-Rivera MS, Medina-Elizarraraz KG, Cortez-González J, Murrieta-Dueñas R, Alvarado-Rodríguez CE, Ramírez-Minguela JDJ, Hernández JGS. Numerical Analysis of the Hydrodynamics of Proximity Impellers using the SPH Method. Systems and Control Transactions 4:8-13 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.135615
Author Affiliations
Hernández-Rivera MS: Tecnológico Nacional de México / Campus Irapuato, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Irapuato, Guanajuato, México
Medina-Elizarraraz KG: Tecnológico Nacional de México / Campus Irapuato, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Irapuato, Guanajuato, México
Cortez-González J: Tecnológico Nacional de México / Campus Irapuato, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Irapuato, Guanajuato, México
Murrieta-Dueñas R: Tecnológico Nacional de México / Campus Irapuato, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Irapuato, Guanajuato, México
Alvarado-Rodríguez CE: Universidad de Guanajuato, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Guanajuato, Guanajuato, México; Secretaria de Ciencias, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación, Ciudad de México, México
Ramírez-Minguela JDJ: Universidad de Guanajuato, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Guanajuato, Guanajuato, México
Hernández JGS: Universidad de Guanajuato, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Guanajuato, Guanajuato, México
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
8
Last Page
13
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0008-0013-1115-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0152v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.135615
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
1059
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0152v1
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Chambergo, J.C., Valverde, Q., Pachas, A. A., & Yepez, H. (2017). Estudio del Comportamiento Fluido-Dinámico de un Agitador a Escala Reducida Mediante Simulación Numérica. Información tecnológica, vol. 28(3), 37-46 https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642017000300005
  2. Flores, C. J., & Cuevas, C. N. (2008). Diseño de una mezcladora dosificadora de cremas cosméticas. [Tesis de licenciatura, Escuela Politécnica Nacional]. Repositorio Digital - EPN
  3. Gil, I. D., Guevara, J. R., García, J. L., Leguizamón, A., & Rodríguez, G. (2016). Process Analysis and Simulation in Chemical Engineering. Springer International Publishing
  4. Londoño, J. (2019). Propuesta de mejora en la línea de vegetales para la empresa PANAMERICANA DE ALIMENTOS SAS, mediante un sistema automático de transporte dosificación y mezcla de granos. [Tesis de licenciatura, INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO METROPOLITANO]. Repositorio Institucional ITM
  5. Miño Valdés, J. E., Benítez Cortés, I., & Pérez Martínez, A. (2020). Simulación de procesos químicos y aplicaciones del simulador SuperPro Designer. Universidad Nacional de Misiones
  6. Monaghan, J. J. (1992), Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 30, 543-574, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.30.1.543
  7. Rodríguez, J.C., Luviano, J.L. & Vargas, J.C. (2018). Análisis de la hidrodinámica de fluidos en tanques agitados. JOVENES DE LA CIENCIA Revista de Divulgación Científica, Vol. 4 (no. 1), 5(2), 3036
  8. Uribe, A. R., Rivera, R., Aguilera, A., y Murrieta, E. (2012). AGITACION Y MEZCLADO. Departamento de Ingeniería Química, División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad de Guanajuato. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Guanajuato. http://repositorio.ugto.mx/bitstream/20.500.12059/6256/1/3_Agitacin ymezclado.pdf
  9. Ye, T., Pan, D., Huang, C., & Liu, M. (2019). Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for complex fluid flows: Recent developments in methodology and applications. Physics of Fluids, 31(1) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5068697
  10. Yin, C., Zheng, K., He, J., Xiong, Y., Tian, Z., Lin, Y., & Long, D. (2022). Turbulent CFD Simulation of Two Rotor-Stator Agitators for High Homogeneity and Liquid Level Stability in Stirred Tank. Materials, 15(23), 8563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238563
  11. Zawawi, M. H., Saleha, A., Salwa, A., Hassan, N. H., Zahari, N. M., Ramli, M. Z., & Muda, Z. C. (2018). A review: Fundamentals of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). In AIP conference proceedings, vol. 2030, No. 1 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5066893