LAPSE:2026.0483
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0483
GPU-Accelerated Nonlinear Multi-Period AC Optimal Power Flow for Large-Scale Power-Hydrogen Systems
June 12, 2026
Abstract
The growing penetration of renewable energy sources and power-to-hydrogen (P2H) systems demands high-fidelity, large-scale optimization frameworks that capture the nonlinear physics of both AC power flow and hydrogen thermodynamics. However, existing approaches rely on DC approximations and simplified electrolyzer models, neglecting critical operational constraints. As a result, accurately modeling such systems leads to large-scale nonlinear programs that are computationally intractable for conventional CPU-based solvers. This motivates the need for scalable optimization frameworks capable of handling both physical fidelity and computational complexity. This paper proposes a fully GPU-native framework for solving large-scale multi-period AC optimal power flow (AC-OPF) problems with integrated power-to-hydrogen systems. High-fidelity thermodynamic models of hydrogen production, compression, cooling, and storage are coupled with AC power flow constraints, resulting in large-scale nonlinear programs (NLPs) with up to 14.4 million variables and 22.4 million constraints in the largest benchmark case (9, 591-bus network with a 168-hour horizon). To enable scalable solutions, condensed-space KKT reformulations and GPU-accelerated sparse Cholesky factorization are employed within an end-to-end GPU optimization pipeline. Numerical results on benchmark networks up to 9, 591 buses demonstrate 10-600× speedups over CPU solvers, whereas CPU-based solvers fail to converge on the largest instances. Operational studies further highlight the importance of thermodynamic constraints in realistic hydrogen system scheduling.
The growing penetration of renewable energy sources and power-to-hydrogen (P2H) systems demands high-fidelity, large-scale optimization frameworks that capture the nonlinear physics of both AC power flow and hydrogen thermodynamics. However, existing approaches rely on DC approximations and simplified electrolyzer models, neglecting critical operational constraints. As a result, accurately modeling such systems leads to large-scale nonlinear programs that are computationally intractable for conventional CPU-based solvers. This motivates the need for scalable optimization frameworks capable of handling both physical fidelity and computational complexity. This paper proposes a fully GPU-native framework for solving large-scale multi-period AC optimal power flow (AC-OPF) problems with integrated power-to-hydrogen systems. High-fidelity thermodynamic models of hydrogen production, compression, cooling, and storage are coupled with AC power flow constraints, resulting in large-scale nonlinear programs (NLPs) with up to 14.4 million variables and 22.4 million constraints in the largest benchmark case (9, 591-bus network with a 168-hour horizon). To enable scalable solutions, condensed-space KKT reformulations and GPU-accelerated sparse Cholesky factorization are employed within an end-to-end GPU optimization pipeline. Numerical results on benchmark networks up to 9, 591 buses demonstrate 10-600× speedups over CPU solvers, whereas CPU-based solvers fail to converge on the largest instances. Operational studies further highlight the importance of thermodynamic constraints in realistic hydrogen system scheduling.
Record ID
Keywords
AC optimal power flow, GPU-accelerated optimization, integrated energy systems, nonlinear programming, power-to-hydrogen
Subject
Suggested Citation
Song G, Lauinger D, Shin S, Na J. GPU-Accelerated Nonlinear Multi-Period AC Optimal Power Flow for Large-Scale Power-Hydrogen Systems. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2243-2251 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.176727
Author Affiliations
Song G: Ewha Womans University, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Lauinger D: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Energy Initiative, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Shin S: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Na J: Ewha Womans University, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Lauinger D: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Energy Initiative, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Shin S: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Na J: Ewha Womans University, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2243
Last Page
2251
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2243-2251-395-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0483
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.176727
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
2
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0483
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Li X, Lepour D, Heymann F, Maréchal F. Electrification and digitalization effects on sectoral energy demand and consumption: a prospective study towards 2050. Energy 279:127992 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127992
- Shiraishi K, Park WY, Kammen DM. The role of hydrogen as long-duration energy storage and as an international energy carrier for electricity sector decarbonization. Environ. Res. Lett. 19:084011 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5856
- Singh A, Kumar A, Chinmaya KA, Maulik A. Optimal operation of an electricity-hydrogen DC microgrid with integrated demand response. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 39:101451 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2024.101451
- Martínez L, Fernández D, Mantz R. Two layer control strategy of an island DC microgrid with hydrogen storage system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 50:365-378 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.009
- Shin S, Anitescu M, Pacaud F. Accelerating optimal power flow with gpus: SIMD abstraction of nonlinear programs and condensed-space interior-point methods. Electric Power Systems Research 236:110651 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2024.110651
- G-L F, Desforges R. Limoges. essai d'analyse demographique, economique et sociale (etude sommaire). Population (French Edition) 17:806 (1962) https://doi.org/10.2307/1526309
- Johnson, Sanjay, et al. "ExaModelsPower. jl: A GPU-Compatible Modeling Library for Nonlinear Power System Optimization." arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.12897 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.12897
- Baumhof MT, Raheli E, Johnsen AG, Kazempour J. Optimization of hybrid power plants: when is a detailed electrolyzer model necessary?. 2023 IEEE Belgrade PowerTech :1-10 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/powertech55446.2023.10202860
- Falcão DS, Pinto AMFR. A review on PEM electrolyzer modelling: guidelines for beginners. Journal of Cleaner Production 261:121184 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121184
- Yigit T, Selamet OF. Mathematical modeling and dynamic simulink simulation of high-pressure PEM electrolyzer system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41:13901-13914 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.022
- Pacaud, François, et al. "Condensed-space methods for nonlinear programming on GPUs." arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14236 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.14236
- Regev, Shaked, et al. "A hybrid direct-iterative method for solving kkt linear systems." arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03636 (2021) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.03636
- NVIDIA, cuDSS: CUDA Direct Sparse Solver Library, https://developer.nvidia.com/cudss
- Zheng Y, You S, Bindner HW, Münster M. Optimal day-ahead dispatch of an alkaline electrolyser system concerning thermal-electric properties and state-transitional dynamics. Applied Energy 307:118091 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118091
- Babaeinejadsarookolaee, Sogol, et al. "The power grid library for benchmarking ac optimal power flow algorithms." arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.02788 (2019) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.02788
(0.08 seconds)
[0.09 s]

