Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0447
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0447
Rolling-Horizon Scheduling for Dynamic Market-Driven Operation of an Air Separation Plant
Kieran McKenzie, Christopher L. E. Swartz
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Cryogenic air separation units (ASUs) are the primary industrial technology for producing high purity oxygen, nitrogen, and argon gases at commercial scale. Cryogenic ASUs are large consumers of electricity, making them ideal candidates for market-driven operation research in today's volatile and uncertain manufacturing environments. To maximize profitability, ASU operation must dynamically adapt to changing market conditions as they evolve. This work explores the implementation of a rolling-horizon scheduling (RHS) strategy for the real-time market-driven operation of a high-dimensional ASU model with inventory, responding to uncertainty in future plant demand and electricity price forecasts by periodically rescheduling in response to updated market information. A dynamic latent variable-based surrogate model (LV-SM) is used within the scheduling framework as a computationally efficient substitute for an existing first-principles-based ASU model. Results show that RHS and plant inventory are effective strategies for handling uncertainties in the future market forecasts, while the LV-SM shows computational performance suitable for real-time implementation. With this scheduling framework in place, extensions involving expanded case studies and uncertainty-aware optimization are planned for future work.
Keywords
Air Separation, Dynamic Optimization, Neural Network, Principal Component Analysis, Rolling-horizon, Scheduling, Surrogate Modeling
Suggested Citation
McKenzie K, Swartz CLE. Rolling-Horizon Scheduling for Dynamic Market-Driven Operation of an Air Separation Plant. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1958-1966 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.158865
Author Affiliations
McKenzie K: McMaster University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Swartz CLE: McMaster University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Hamilton, ON, Canada [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1958
Last Page
1966
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1958-1966-105-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0447
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.158865
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
22
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0447
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Pattison RC, Touretzky CR, Harjunkoski I, Baldea M. Moving horizon closed?loop production scheduling using dynamic process models. AIChE Journal 63:639-651 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15408
  2. Kelley MT, Baldick R, Baldea M. An empirical study of moving horizon closed-loop demand response scheduling. Journal of Process Control 92:137-148 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2020.05.011
  3. Schäfer P, Caspari A, Mhamdi A, Mitsos A. Economic nonlinear model predictive control using hybrid mechanistic data-driven models for optimal operation in real-time electricity markets: in-silico application to air separation processes. Journal of Process Control 84:171-181 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2019.10.008
  4. Caspari A, Offermanns C, Schäfer P, Mhamdi A, Mitsos A. A flexible air separation process: 2. optimal operation using economic model predictive control. AIChE Journal 65: (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16721
  5. Zhang Q, Morari MF, Grossmann IE, Sundaramoorthy A, Pinto JM. An adjustable robust optimization approach to scheduling of continuous industrial processes providing interruptible load. Computers & Chemical Engineering 86:106-119 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.12.018
  6. Kelley MT, Baldick R, Baldea M. Demand response scheduling under uncertainty: chance?constrained framework and application to an air separation unit. AIChE Journal 66: (2020) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16273
  7. Zhang Q, Cremer JL, Grossmann IE, Sundaramoorthy A, Pinto JM. Risk-based integrated production scheduling and electricity procurement for continuous power-intensive processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering 86:90-105 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.12.015
  8. Cao Y, Swartz CLE, Baldea M, Blouin S. Optimization-based assessment of design limitations to air separation plant agility in demand response scenarios. Journal of Process Control 33:37-48 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.05.002
  9. McKenzie K, Swartz CLE, Corbett B. Dynamic surrogate modeling using latent variable methods and neural networks for market-driven operation of an air separation unit. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 65:584-599 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02735
  10. Nomikos P, MacGregor JF. Monitoring batch processes using multiway principal component analysis. AIChE Journal 40:1361-1375 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690400809
  11. Fletcher R, Leyffer S, Ralph D, Scholtes S. Local convergence of SQP methods for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 17:259-286 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1137/s1052623402407382
  12. Ralph D, Wright SJ. Some properties of regularization and penalization schemes for mpecs. Optimization Methods and Software 19:527-556 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1080/10556780410001709439
  13. Mathur P, Swartz CLE, Zyngier D, Welt F. Robust online scheduling for optimal short-term operation of cascaded hydropower systems under uncertainty. Journal of Process Control 98:52-65 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2020.12.005
(0.08 seconds)

[0.08 s]