LAPSE:2026.0443v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0443v1
Physics Constrained Machine Learning for Modeling and Optimization of Chemical Process Systems
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) reduces reliance on computationally expensive first-principles simulation while capturing complex nonlinear behaviors. However, poor extrapolation, overfitting, limited interpretability, and lack of strict consistency with governing laws limit the use of ML models in process applications. Current methods for learning optimization policies also struggle with constraint satisfaction and optimality guarantees. Approaches such as physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) incorporate constraints "softly" and do not ensure strict constraint enforcement-an issue that can be particularly detrimental in safety-critical applications, where even minor violations may lead to unsafe or infeasible decisions. To resolve these issues, we develop an ML framework with a differential projection layer that allows computationally efficient process modeling, parameter estimation, and nonlinear optimization with feasibility and optimality guarantees. The framework is general in a sense that, depending on the loss function and the projection layer, it provides different functionalities. For instance, an ANN followed by a distance minimization-based projection leads to a hybrid mechanistic/data-driven process simulator, KKT-HardNet, that ensures inference with strict satisfaction of linear/nonlinear equality/inequality constraints. An ANN with a gradient-based loss function and a Taylor approximation-based pointwise projection leads to DAE-HardNet, which solves and/or estimates parameters of ODE/PDE-based governing equations. Lastly, an ANN with a distance-minimization based projection followed by objective-based loss function leads to KKT-OptNet, which learns to solve nonlinear optimization problems for different parameter instances. We illustrate the use of these tools for the modeling, optimization, and parameter estimation of complex processes systems.
Machine learning (ML) reduces reliance on computationally expensive first-principles simulation while capturing complex nonlinear behaviors. However, poor extrapolation, overfitting, limited interpretability, and lack of strict consistency with governing laws limit the use of ML models in process applications. Current methods for learning optimization policies also struggle with constraint satisfaction and optimality guarantees. Approaches such as physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) incorporate constraints "softly" and do not ensure strict constraint enforcement-an issue that can be particularly detrimental in safety-critical applications, where even minor violations may lead to unsafe or infeasible decisions. To resolve these issues, we develop an ML framework with a differential projection layer that allows computationally efficient process modeling, parameter estimation, and nonlinear optimization with feasibility and optimality guarantees. The framework is general in a sense that, depending on the loss function and the projection layer, it provides different functionalities. For instance, an ANN followed by a distance minimization-based projection leads to a hybrid mechanistic/data-driven process simulator, KKT-HardNet, that ensures inference with strict satisfaction of linear/nonlinear equality/inequality constraints. An ANN with a gradient-based loss function and a Taylor approximation-based pointwise projection leads to DAE-HardNet, which solves and/or estimates parameters of ODE/PDE-based governing equations. Lastly, an ANN with a distance-minimization based projection followed by objective-based loss function leads to KKT-OptNet, which learns to solve nonlinear optimization problems for different parameter instances. We illustrate the use of these tools for the modeling, optimization, and parameter estimation of complex processes systems.
Record ID
Keywords
AI/ML, Process Modeling, Process Optimization
Subject
Suggested Citation
Golder R, Roy BN, Hasan MMF. Physics Constrained Machine Learning for Modeling and Optimization of Chemical Process Systems. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1925-1931 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.119006
Author Affiliations
Golder R: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, TX, 77843, USA [ORCID]
Roy BN: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, TX, 77843, USA [ORCID]
Hasan MMF: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. Texas A&M Energy Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Roy BN: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, TX, 77843, USA [ORCID]
Hasan MMF: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. Texas A&M Energy Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1925
Last Page
1931
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1925-1931-682-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0443v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.119006
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
305
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0443v1
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics 378:686-707 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
- Karniadakis GE, Kevrekidis IG, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S, Yang L. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat Rev Phys 3:422-440 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5
- Iftakher A, Golder R, Roy BN, Faruque Hasan MM. Physics-informed neural networks with hard nonlinear equality and inequality constraints. Computers & Chemical Engineering 204:109418 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109418
- Chen H, Flores GEC, Li C. Physics-informed neural networks with hard linear equality constraints. Computers & Chemical Engineering 189:108764 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108764
- Stellato B, Banjac G, Goulart P, Bemporad A, Boyd S. OSQP: an operator splitting solver for quadratic programs. Math. Prog. Comp. 12:637-672 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-020-00179-2
- Golder, Rahul, Bimol Nath Roy, and M. M. Hasan. "DAE-HardNet: A Physics Constrained Neural Network Enforcing Differential-Algebraic Hard Constraints." arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05881 (2025).
(0.11 seconds)
[0.11 s]

