Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0427
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0427
Nonconvex Robust Optimization for Process Design with Artificial Neural Networks Embedded
Diego Izquierdo González, Basit Adeogun, Yuhui Yin, Vassilis M. Charitopoulos
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have emerged as powerful surrogate models in process design and optimisation, capable of capturing complex nonlinear process behaviour while significantly reducing computational cost compared to detailed first-principles simulations. However, ANN prediction errors in safety-critical applications can lead to suboptimal or vulnerable designs, necessitating rigorous treatment of approximation uncertainties. While probabilistic approaches exist for surrogate-based decision making, risk-averse contexts that require formal robustness guarantees face a fundamental challenge: the nonconvex nature of ANN-embedded models hinders the employment of standard robust optimisation methods. To this end, in this work we explore the global robust optimisation of process design problems with embedded ANNs. A robust spatial branch-and-bound (RsBB) algorithm to achieve global optimality is proposed while enforcing constraint satisfaction across all uncertainty realisations. This approach integrates spatial branch-and-bound with adversarial cuts generation, concurrently searching for the global optimum while ensuring robust feasibility despite ANN prediction uncertainties. We test the proposed algorithm on the ANN-embedded optimisation of a cumene manufacturing process, across a range of conservatism levels. The algorithm computes solutions within the prescribed optimality tolerance while quantifying the robustness-performance trade-off.
Keywords
Global optimisation, Hybrid modelling, Machine learning-based optimisation, Process design, Robust optimisation
Suggested Citation
González DI, Adeogun B, Yin Y, Charitopoulos VM. Nonconvex Robust Optimization for Process Design with Artificial Neural Networks Embedded. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1793-1800 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.139045
Author Affiliations
González DI: Department of Chemical Engineering, The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, University College London (UCL), Torrington Place, WC1E 7JE, UK
Adeogun B: Department of Chemical Engineering, The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, University College London (UCL), Torrington Place, WC1E 7JE, UK
Yin Y: Department of Chemical Engineering, The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, University College London (UCL), Torrington Place, WC1E 7JE, UK [ORCID]
Charitopoulos VM: Department of Chemical Engineering, The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, University College London (UCL), Torrington Place, WC1E 7JE, UK [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1793
Last Page
1800
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1793-1800-496-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0427
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.139045
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
2
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0427
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Huster WR, Schweidtmann AM, Lüthje JT, Mitsos A. Deterministic global superstructure-based optimization of an organic rankine cycle. Computers & Chemical Engineering 141:106996 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106996
  2. Hüllen G, Zhai J, Kim SH, Sinha A, Realff MJ, Boukouvala F. Managing uncertainty in data-driven simulation-based optimization. Computers & Chemical Engineering 136:106519 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106519
  3. McBride K, Sundmacher K. Overview of surrogate modeling in chemical process engineering. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 91:228-239 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800091
  4. Luo Y, Ierapetritou M. Multifeedstock and multiproduct process design using neural network surrogate flexibility constraints. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 62:2067-2079 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c02968
  5. Beykal B, Boukouvala F, Floudas CA, Sorek N, Zalavadia H, Gildin E. Global optimization of grey-box computational systems using surrogate functions and application to highly constrained oil-field operations. Computers & Chemical Engineering 114:99-110 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.01.005
  6. Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A. Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Operations Research Letters 25:1-13 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6377(99)00016-4
  7. Marousi, A., & Charitopoulos, V. M. (2025). Global and Robust Optimisation for Non-Convex Quadratic Programs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07310. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.07310
  8. Gorissen BL, Yan?ko?lu ?, den Hertog D. A practical guide to robust optimization. Omega 53:124-137 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.12.006
  9. Ryoo HS, Sahinidis NV. Global optimization of nonconvex nlps and minlps with applications in process design. Computers & Chemical Engineering 19:551-566 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(94)00097-2
  10. Liberti L, Maculan N. Global optimization. Springer US (2006) https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30528-9
  11. Wilhelm ME, Wang C, Stuber MD. Convex and concave envelopes of artificial neural network activation functions for deterministic global optimization. J Glob Optim 85:569-594 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-022-01228-x
  12. Schweidtmann AM, Mitsos A. Deterministic global optimization with artificial neural networks embedded. J Optim Theory Appl 180:925-948 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-018-1396-0
  13. Anderson BG, Ma Z, Li J, Sojoudi S. Tightened convex relaxations for neural network robustness certification. 2020 59th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) :2190-2197 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/cdc42340.2020.9303750
  14. Mutapcic A, Boyd S. Cutting-set methods for robust convex optimization with pessimizing oracles. Optimization Methods and Software 24:381-406 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1080/10556780802712889
  15. Wiebe J, Cecílio I, Dunlop J, Misener R. A robust approach to warped gaussian process-constrained optimization. Math. Program. 196:805-839 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-021-01762-8
  16. Smith EMB, Pantelides CC. Global optimisation of nonconvex minlps. Computers & Chemical Engineering 21:S791-S796 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-1354(97)87599-0
  17. Luyben WL. Design and control of the cumene process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49:719-734 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9011535
  18. Schultz ES, Trierweiler JO, Farenzena M. The importance of nominal operating point selection in self-optimizing control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55:7381-7393 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02044
  19. Ammari B, Ceccon F, Jalving J, Haddad J, Thebelt A, Tsay C, Bynum M, Laird C, Misener R. Machine learning surrogates with OMLT and IDAES for improved design and analysis of energy systems. 2022 INFORMS Annual Meeting - Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America - October - 2022 : (2022) https://doi.org/10.2172/2432248
  20. Zhang Y, Sahinidis NV. Solving continuous and discrete nonlinear programs with BARON. Comput Optim Appl 92:1123-1161 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-024-00633-0
(0.09 seconds)

[0.1 s]