LAPSE:2026.0372
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0372
Energy Baseline Surrogates for Modular Reactors from Generated Recipe-Based Process Data
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Energy Baselines (EnBs) provide a reference for evaluating Energy Key Performance Indicators (eKPIs), and their establishment is mandated under ISO 50001. Since eKPIs are typically defined per functional unit, such as product, recipe or recipe phase, EnBs should not be averaged across heterogeneous operating conditions but instead be defined in a context-specific manner. This requires detailed mechanistic models or sufficiently rich operational data for statistical approaches, both of which are often unavailable in highly flexible, semi-continuous production systems.This paper proposes a four-stage framework for the automated generation of surrogate EnBs to address this gap. In the first stage, the relevant training data space is defined, including non-influenceable variables (e.g., equipment deviations), design parameters (e.g., material properties), and adaptable recipe parameters (e.g., operating conditions and control actions). In the second stage, these parameters are systematically varied to automatically generate a labelled dataset representing process dynamics and energy behavior. The third stage trains and evaluates candidate surrogate models using the PRESTO recommendation framework, followed by a global sensitivity analysis based on Sobol indices to identify the dominant drivers of energy performance.The framework is demonstrated using a stirred tank reactor at laboratory (2 L) scale. The results show that Random Forest surrogates provide reliable performance across a wide operating range and that recipe parameters, particularly mixer rotational speed, dominate energy efficiency. Future work will address scalability to other equipment types and reactive processes.
Energy Baselines (EnBs) provide a reference for evaluating Energy Key Performance Indicators (eKPIs), and their establishment is mandated under ISO 50001. Since eKPIs are typically defined per functional unit, such as product, recipe or recipe phase, EnBs should not be averaged across heterogeneous operating conditions but instead be defined in a context-specific manner. This requires detailed mechanistic models or sufficiently rich operational data for statistical approaches, both of which are often unavailable in highly flexible, semi-continuous production systems.This paper proposes a four-stage framework for the automated generation of surrogate EnBs to address this gap. In the first stage, the relevant training data space is defined, including non-influenceable variables (e.g., equipment deviations), design parameters (e.g., material properties), and adaptable recipe parameters (e.g., operating conditions and control actions). In the second stage, these parameters are systematically varied to automatically generate a labelled dataset representing process dynamics and energy behavior. The third stage trains and evaluates candidate surrogate models using the PRESTO recommendation framework, followed by a global sensitivity analysis based on Sobol indices to identify the dominant drivers of energy performance.The framework is demonstrated using a stirred tank reactor at laboratory (2 L) scale. The results show that Random Forest surrogates provide reliable performance across a wide operating range and that recipe parameters, particularly mixer rotational speed, dominate energy efficiency. Future work will address scalability to other equipment types and reactive processes.
Record ID
Keywords
Energy Baseline, Energy Efficiency, Energy Management, gProms, Recipes, Surrogate Modeling
Subject
Suggested Citation
Parbat S, Rajanala G, Viedt I, Urbas L. Energy Baseline Surrogates for Modular Reactors from Generated Recipe-Based Process Data. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1336-1344 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.169335
Author Affiliations
Parbat S: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Dresden, Germany [ORCID]
Rajanala G: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Dresden, Germany
Viedt I: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Dresden, Germany
Urbas L: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Dresden, Germany
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Rajanala G: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Dresden, Germany
Viedt I: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Dresden, Germany
Urbas L: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Dresden, Germany
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1336
Last Page
1344
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1336-1344-528-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0372
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.169335
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
24
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0372
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Ali M, Evans S. The impact of best practice on energy efficiency in industrial decarbonization policy. Energy Policy 204:114632 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114632
- ISO 50001. ISO 50001: 2018(e) energy management systems - requirements with guidance for use. (2018)
- Parbat S, Viedt I, Härtner S, Urbas L. Energy management system plug-&-monitor architecture with an asset administration shell. IFAC-PapersOnLine 59:59-64 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.11.925
- Beisheim B, Rahimi-Adli K, Krämer S, Engell S. Energy performance analysis of continuous processes using surrogate models. Energy 183:776-787 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.176
- American National Standards Institute. ANSI-isa-88.00. 01-2010: batch control part 1: models and terminology. (2010)
- ISO 50006. ISO 50006: 2023(e) energy management systems - measuring energy performance using energy baselines (enb) and energy performance indicators (enpi). (2023)
- Winter M, Klausmann T, Kleinert T. Capability knowledge base query to allocate process resources for master recipe formulation. at - Automatisierungstechnik 72:906-918 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2023-0223
- Kudela J, Matousek R. Recent advances and applications of surrogate models for finite element method computations: a review. Soft Comput 26:13709-13733 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07362-8
- Parbat S, Viedt I, Urbas L. A comparative evaluation of complexity in mechanistic and surrogate modeling approaches for digital twins. Systems and Control Transactions 4:166-172 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.122855
- Winz J, Nentwich C, Engell S. Surrogate modeling of thermodynamic equilibria: applications, sampling and optimization. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 93:1898-1906 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.202100092
- Potter C. PQLI application of science- and risk-based approaches (ICH Q8, Q9, and Q10) to existing products. J Pharm Innov 4:4-23 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-009-9051-9
- Williams B, Otashu J, Leyland S, Eden MR, Cremaschi S. PRESTO: predictive recommendation of surrogate models to approximate and optimize. Chemical Engineering Science 249:117360 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117360
- Iooss B, Lemaître P. A review on global sensitivity analysis methods. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series :101-122 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-8_5
(0.09 seconds)
[0.1 s]

