LAPSE:2023.28759
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.28759
Pellet Production from Miscanthus: Energy and Environmental Assessment
April 12, 2023
Abstract
The production of wood pellets has grown considerably in the last decades. Besides woody biomass, other feedstocks can be used for pellet production. Among these, miscanthus presents some advantages because, even if specifically cultivated, it requires low inputs such as fertilisers and pesticides and shows high biomass yield (up to 28 tons of dry matter ha−1 in Europe). Even if in the last years some studies evaluated the environmental impact of woody pellet production, there is no information about the environmental performances of miscanthus pellet production. In this study, the environmental impact of miscanthus pellet was evaluated using the Life Cycle Assessment approach with a cradle-to plant gate perspective. Primary data were collected in a small-medium size pelletizing plant located in Northern Italy where miscanthus is cultivated to be directly processed. The results highlight how the miscanthus pellet shows lower environmental impact compared to woody pellet, mainly due to the lower energy consumption during pelletizing. The possibility to pelletize the miscanthus biomass without any drying offsets the environmental impact related to the miscanthus cultivation for all the evaluated impact categories (except for Marine eutrophication). In detail, for global warming potential, 1 ton of miscanthus pellet shows an impact of 121.6 kg CO2 eq. (about 8% lower respect to woody pellet) while for the other evaluated impact categories the impact reduction ranges from 4 to 59%. Harvesting, which unlike the other field operations is carried out every year, is by far the main contributor to the impacts of the cultivation phase while electricity is the main contributor to the pelletizing phase.
The production of wood pellets has grown considerably in the last decades. Besides woody biomass, other feedstocks can be used for pellet production. Among these, miscanthus presents some advantages because, even if specifically cultivated, it requires low inputs such as fertilisers and pesticides and shows high biomass yield (up to 28 tons of dry matter ha−1 in Europe). Even if in the last years some studies evaluated the environmental impact of woody pellet production, there is no information about the environmental performances of miscanthus pellet production. In this study, the environmental impact of miscanthus pellet was evaluated using the Life Cycle Assessment approach with a cradle-to plant gate perspective. Primary data were collected in a small-medium size pelletizing plant located in Northern Italy where miscanthus is cultivated to be directly processed. The results highlight how the miscanthus pellet shows lower environmental impact compared to woody pellet, mainly due to the lower energy consumption during pelletizing. The possibility to pelletize the miscanthus biomass without any drying offsets the environmental impact related to the miscanthus cultivation for all the evaluated impact categories (except for Marine eutrophication). In detail, for global warming potential, 1 ton of miscanthus pellet shows an impact of 121.6 kg CO2 eq. (about 8% lower respect to woody pellet) while for the other evaluated impact categories the impact reduction ranges from 4 to 59%. Harvesting, which unlike the other field operations is carried out every year, is by far the main contributor to the impacts of the cultivation phase while electricity is the main contributor to the pelletizing phase.
Record ID
Keywords
life cycle assessment, lignocellulosic biofuels, miscanthus, pellets
Subject
Suggested Citation
Fusi A, Bacenetti J, Proto AR, Tedesco DEA, Pessina D, Facchinetti D. Pellet Production from Miscanthus: Energy and Environmental Assessment. (2023). LAPSE:2023.28759
Author Affiliations
Fusi A: Department of Environmental and Policy Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
Bacenetti J: Department of Environmental and Policy Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy [ORCID]
Proto AR: Department of Agraria, Università degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy [ORCID]
Tedesco DEA: Department of Environmental and Policy Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy [ORCID]
Pessina D: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science—Production, Landscape, Ageoenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy [ORCID]
Facchinetti D: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science—Production, Landscape, Ageoenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy [ORCID]
Bacenetti J: Department of Environmental and Policy Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy [ORCID]
Proto AR: Department of Agraria, Università degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy [ORCID]
Tedesco DEA: Department of Environmental and Policy Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy [ORCID]
Pessina D: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science—Production, Landscape, Ageoenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy [ORCID]
Facchinetti D: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science—Production, Landscape, Ageoenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
14
Issue
1
Article Number
E73
Year
2020
Publication Date
2020-12-25
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en14010073, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.28759
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010073
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
174
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 12, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 12, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.28759
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
