LAPSE:2023.23220v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.23220v1
Frequency-Domain Nonlinear Modeling Approaches for Power Systems Components—A Comparison
March 27, 2023
Abstract
Harmonic simulations play a key role in studying and predicting the impact of nonlinear devices on the power quality level of distribution grids. A frequency-domain approach allows higher computational efficiency, which has key importance as long as complex networks have to be studied. However, this requires proper frequency-domain behavioral models able to represent the nonlinear voltage−current relationship characterizing these devices. The Frequency Transfer Matrix (FTM) method is one of the most widespread frequency domain modeling approaches for power system applications. However, others suitable techniques have been developed in the last years, in particular the X-parameters approach, which comes from radiofrequency and microwave applications, and the simplified Volterra models under quasi-sinusoidal conditions, that have been specifically tailored for power system devices. In this paper FTM, X-parameters and simplified Volterra approaches are compared in representing the nonlinear voltage −current relationship of a bridge rectifier feeding an ohmic-capacitive dc load. Results show that the X-parameters model reaches good accuracy, which is slightly better than that achieved by the FTM and simplified Volterra models, but with a considerably larger set of coefficients. Simplified Volterra models under quasi-sinusoidal conditions allows an effective trade-off between accuracy and complexity.
Harmonic simulations play a key role in studying and predicting the impact of nonlinear devices on the power quality level of distribution grids. A frequency-domain approach allows higher computational efficiency, which has key importance as long as complex networks have to be studied. However, this requires proper frequency-domain behavioral models able to represent the nonlinear voltage−current relationship characterizing these devices. The Frequency Transfer Matrix (FTM) method is one of the most widespread frequency domain modeling approaches for power system applications. However, others suitable techniques have been developed in the last years, in particular the X-parameters approach, which comes from radiofrequency and microwave applications, and the simplified Volterra models under quasi-sinusoidal conditions, that have been specifically tailored for power system devices. In this paper FTM, X-parameters and simplified Volterra approaches are compared in representing the nonlinear voltage −current relationship of a bridge rectifier feeding an ohmic-capacitive dc load. Results show that the X-parameters model reaches good accuracy, which is slightly better than that achieved by the FTM and simplified Volterra models, but with a considerably larger set of coefficients. Simplified Volterra models under quasi-sinusoidal conditions allows an effective trade-off between accuracy and complexity.
Record ID
Keywords
harmonic analysis, harmonic balance, Modelling, nonlinearity, power systems
Subject
Suggested Citation
Faifer M, Laurano C, Ottoboni R, Toscani S, Zanoni M. Frequency-Domain Nonlinear Modeling Approaches for Power Systems Components—A Comparison. (2023). LAPSE:2023.23220v1
Author Affiliations
Faifer M: DEIB (Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria), Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy [ORCID]
Laurano C: DEIB (Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria), Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy [ORCID]
Ottoboni R: DEIB (Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria), Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy [ORCID]
Toscani S: DEIB (Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria), Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy [ORCID]
Zanoni M: Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico S.p.A., via Rubattino 54, 20134 Milano, Italy [ORCID]
Laurano C: DEIB (Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria), Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy [ORCID]
Ottoboni R: DEIB (Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria), Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy [ORCID]
Toscani S: DEIB (Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria), Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy [ORCID]
Zanoni M: Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico S.p.A., via Rubattino 54, 20134 Milano, Italy [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
13
Issue
10
Article Number
E2609
Year
2020
Publication Date
2020-05-20
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en13102609, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.23220v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102609
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
420
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Mar 27, 2023
Verified by curator on
Mar 27, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.23220v1
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.38 seconds) 0.03 + 0.04 + 0.15 + 0.09 + 0.01 + 0.02 + 0.01 + 0 + 0.01 + 0.02 + 0 + 0
