LAPSE:2023.2205
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.2205
Optimization of Hemp Bast Microfiber Production Using Response Surface Modelling
February 21, 2023
Abstract
Non-wood biomass is particularly attractive as a cellulose source because of the lower lignin content. However, optimal cellulose extraction conditions are required as lignin content varies between plant sources. Further, the use of organic acids in place of harsh mineral acids is of interest in “greening” the cellulose production process. This study sought to establish optimum parameters for the extraction of cellulose microfibers (CMFs) from hemp (Cannabis sativa) biomass, using maleic and formic acids. Hemp fibers were pre-treated in NaOH (4 wt%) and aqueous chlorite in acetate buffer before ultrasonic treatment to break down bundles. The CMFs produced were compared with those generated from sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to determine combinations of three processing conditions, including acid concentration (45−64%), hydrolysis time (30−90 min), and temperature (45−65 °C). A central composite design (RSM-CCD) model with 21 experimental runs was optimized using MODDE 13.1 software. The model suitably described the data (R2 = 0.99; R2adj = 0.96). Microfibers with an average width of 6.91 µm, crystallinity range 40−75%, and good thermal stability were produced. Crystallinity was influenced by all three factors. The optimal crystallinity predicted by the model was 83.21%, which could be achieved using formic acid 62 wt% formic acid, 36 min hydrolysis time, and 47 °C hydrolysis temperature. These conditions resulted in a crystallinity degree of 82%. These data suggest formic acid can be used as an alternative to sulfuric acid for synthesis of cellulose microfibers from biodegradable hemp waste fibers.
Non-wood biomass is particularly attractive as a cellulose source because of the lower lignin content. However, optimal cellulose extraction conditions are required as lignin content varies between plant sources. Further, the use of organic acids in place of harsh mineral acids is of interest in “greening” the cellulose production process. This study sought to establish optimum parameters for the extraction of cellulose microfibers (CMFs) from hemp (Cannabis sativa) biomass, using maleic and formic acids. Hemp fibers were pre-treated in NaOH (4 wt%) and aqueous chlorite in acetate buffer before ultrasonic treatment to break down bundles. The CMFs produced were compared with those generated from sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to determine combinations of three processing conditions, including acid concentration (45−64%), hydrolysis time (30−90 min), and temperature (45−65 °C). A central composite design (RSM-CCD) model with 21 experimental runs was optimized using MODDE 13.1 software. The model suitably described the data (R2 = 0.99; R2adj = 0.96). Microfibers with an average width of 6.91 µm, crystallinity range 40−75%, and good thermal stability were produced. Crystallinity was influenced by all three factors. The optimal crystallinity predicted by the model was 83.21%, which could be achieved using formic acid 62 wt% formic acid, 36 min hydrolysis time, and 47 °C hydrolysis temperature. These conditions resulted in a crystallinity degree of 82%. These data suggest formic acid can be used as an alternative to sulfuric acid for synthesis of cellulose microfibers from biodegradable hemp waste fibers.
Record ID
Keywords
cellulose, cellulose microfibers, central composite design, Optimization, response contour plots, response surface methodology, response surface plots
Subject
Suggested Citation
Mhlongo JT, Nuapia Y, Tlhaole B, Mahlangu OT, Etale A. Optimization of Hemp Bast Microfiber Production Using Response Surface Modelling. (2023). LAPSE:2023.2205
Author Affiliations
Mhlongo JT: Molecular Sciences Institute, School of Chemistry, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
Nuapia Y: Pharmacy Department, School of Healthcare Sciences, Turfloop Campus, University of Limpopo, Polokwane 0727, South Africa
Tlhaole B: Molecular Sciences Institute, School of Chemistry, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
Mahlangu OT: Institute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa
Etale A: Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK
Nuapia Y: Pharmacy Department, School of Healthcare Sciences, Turfloop Campus, University of Limpopo, Polokwane 0727, South Africa
Tlhaole B: Molecular Sciences Institute, School of Chemistry, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
Mahlangu OT: Institute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa
Etale A: Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
10
Issue
6
First Page
1150
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-06-08
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr10061150, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.2205
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10061150
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
448
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 21, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 21, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.2205
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
[0.53 s]
