LAPSE:2023.21708
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.21708
Computational Modeling and Empirical Analysis of a Biomass-Powered Drinking Water Pasteurization Technology
March 22, 2023
Abstract
While filtration, chlorination, and UV drinking water treatments are commonplace, globally an estimated 1.2 billion people continue to boil their drinking water over inefficient biomass fires instead because it allows them to use available resources paired with a time-tested and trusted method. Although boiling water is culturally well-established, there is vast potential to improve human health, environmental impact, and efficiency by leveraging the fact that a significant reduction in pathogenic microorganisms occurs at temperatures well below boiling through a process known as pasteurization. This paper presents the evaluation of a community-scale, biomass-powered, flow-through water pasteurization system that was designed to heat water to the temperature required for pasteurization to occur before recuperating heat while cooling treated water down to a safe-to-handle temperature. The system is then compared to other common thermal treatment methods including batch-boiling over open fires and improved cookstoves. Results from computational modeling and empirical analysis show that the water pasteurizer significantly increases the overall water treatment capacity (from 7.9 to 411 L/h, adjusted for one hour of treatment via household boiling and operation of the water pasteurizer at steady-state, respectively) and uses far less biomass fuel (from 22 to 5.5 g/L, adjusted for treatment of 1 L of water via household boiling and operation of the water pasteurizer at steady-state, respectively). Notable comparisons to the batch-boiling of water over institutional-sized traditional and improved cookstoves are also demonstrated. Further, the results of fecal indicator reduction through the system (8 log and 6 log reduction of E. coli and bacteriophage MS2, respectively) suggest compliance with US-EPA (6 log and 4 log reduction of E. coli and bacteriophage MS2, respectively) and WHO requirements (effluent concentrations below the detection limit, specified as <1 E. coli CFU/100 mL and <10 bacteriophage MS2 PFU/mL) for the reduction in and effluent concentration of E. coli and bacteriophage for water treatment processes. It is recommended that engineers continue to explore the use of heat transfer and microorganism reduction theory to design technologies that increase the capacity and efficiency for thermal water purification that uses locally-available biomass resources.
While filtration, chlorination, and UV drinking water treatments are commonplace, globally an estimated 1.2 billion people continue to boil their drinking water over inefficient biomass fires instead because it allows them to use available resources paired with a time-tested and trusted method. Although boiling water is culturally well-established, there is vast potential to improve human health, environmental impact, and efficiency by leveraging the fact that a significant reduction in pathogenic microorganisms occurs at temperatures well below boiling through a process known as pasteurization. This paper presents the evaluation of a community-scale, biomass-powered, flow-through water pasteurization system that was designed to heat water to the temperature required for pasteurization to occur before recuperating heat while cooling treated water down to a safe-to-handle temperature. The system is then compared to other common thermal treatment methods including batch-boiling over open fires and improved cookstoves. Results from computational modeling and empirical analysis show that the water pasteurizer significantly increases the overall water treatment capacity (from 7.9 to 411 L/h, adjusted for one hour of treatment via household boiling and operation of the water pasteurizer at steady-state, respectively) and uses far less biomass fuel (from 22 to 5.5 g/L, adjusted for treatment of 1 L of water via household boiling and operation of the water pasteurizer at steady-state, respectively). Notable comparisons to the batch-boiling of water over institutional-sized traditional and improved cookstoves are also demonstrated. Further, the results of fecal indicator reduction through the system (8 log and 6 log reduction of E. coli and bacteriophage MS2, respectively) suggest compliance with US-EPA (6 log and 4 log reduction of E. coli and bacteriophage MS2, respectively) and WHO requirements (effluent concentrations below the detection limit, specified as <1 E. coli CFU/100 mL and <10 bacteriophage MS2 PFU/mL) for the reduction in and effluent concentration of E. coli and bacteriophage for water treatment processes. It is recommended that engineers continue to explore the use of heat transfer and microorganism reduction theory to design technologies that increase the capacity and efficiency for thermal water purification that uses locally-available biomass resources.
Record ID
Keywords
bacteriophage, Biomass, cookstove, D-value, E. coli, US-EPA drinking water standards, water purification
Subject
Suggested Citation
Burleson G, Caplan D, Mays C, Moses N, Navab-Daneshmand T, Sharp K, MacCarty N. Computational Modeling and Empirical Analysis of a Biomass-Powered Drinking Water Pasteurization Technology. (2023). LAPSE:2023.21708
Author Affiliations
Burleson G: School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Caplan D: School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Mays C: School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Moses N: School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Navab-Daneshmand T: School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Sharp K: School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
MacCarty N: School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA [ORCID]
Caplan D: School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Mays C: School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Moses N: School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Navab-Daneshmand T: School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Sharp K: School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
MacCarty N: School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
13
Issue
4
Article Number
E936
Year
2020
Publication Date
2020-02-19
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en13040936, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.21708
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040936
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
394
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Mar 22, 2023
Verified by curator on
Mar 22, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.21708
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.22 seconds)
