LAPSE:2023.10762
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.10762
Life Cycle Prediction Assessment of Battery Electrical Vehicles with Special Focus on Different Lithium-Ion Power Batteries in China
February 27, 2023
Abstract
The incentive policies of new energy vehicles substantially promoted the development of the electrical vehicles technology and industry in China. However, the environmental impact of the key technology parameters progress on the battery electrical vehicles (BEV) is uncertain, and the BEV matching different lithium-ion power batteries shows different environmental burdens. This study conducts a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a BEV matching four different power batteries of lithium-ion phosphate (LFP), lithium-ion nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM), lithium manganese oxide (LMO), and lithium titanate oxide (LTO) batteries. In addition, the 2025 and 2030 prediction analyses of the batteries production and life cycle BEV are conducted with the specially considered change and progress of the power battery energy density, battery manufacturing energy consumption, electricity structure, battery charge efficiency, and vehicle lightweight level. In addition, sensitivity analyses of power battery energy density, battery manufacturing energy consumption, electricity structure, and battery charge efficiency are conducted. The results show that the LFP battery is more environmentally friendly in the global warming potential (GWP) and acidification potential (AP), and the NCM battery is more environmentally friendly in abiotic depletion (fossil) (ADP(f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP). However, the LTO battery shows the highest environmental impact among the four environmental impact categories due to the lower energy density. For life cycle BEV, GWP and ADP(f) of BEV based on LFP, NCM, and LMO are lower than those of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV), while AP and HTP of BEV based on the four batteries are higher than those of ICEV. The grave-to-cradle (GTC) phase of vehicle has substantial environmental benefit to reduce the human toxicity emission. With the improvement of the battery density, battery charge efficiency, electricity structure, and glider lightweight level, life cycle BEVs based on the four different batteries show substantial environmental benefits for four environmental impact categories.
The incentive policies of new energy vehicles substantially promoted the development of the electrical vehicles technology and industry in China. However, the environmental impact of the key technology parameters progress on the battery electrical vehicles (BEV) is uncertain, and the BEV matching different lithium-ion power batteries shows different environmental burdens. This study conducts a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a BEV matching four different power batteries of lithium-ion phosphate (LFP), lithium-ion nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM), lithium manganese oxide (LMO), and lithium titanate oxide (LTO) batteries. In addition, the 2025 and 2030 prediction analyses of the batteries production and life cycle BEV are conducted with the specially considered change and progress of the power battery energy density, battery manufacturing energy consumption, electricity structure, battery charge efficiency, and vehicle lightweight level. In addition, sensitivity analyses of power battery energy density, battery manufacturing energy consumption, electricity structure, and battery charge efficiency are conducted. The results show that the LFP battery is more environmentally friendly in the global warming potential (GWP) and acidification potential (AP), and the NCM battery is more environmentally friendly in abiotic depletion (fossil) (ADP(f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP). However, the LTO battery shows the highest environmental impact among the four environmental impact categories due to the lower energy density. For life cycle BEV, GWP and ADP(f) of BEV based on LFP, NCM, and LMO are lower than those of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV), while AP and HTP of BEV based on the four batteries are higher than those of ICEV. The grave-to-cradle (GTC) phase of vehicle has substantial environmental benefit to reduce the human toxicity emission. With the improvement of the battery density, battery charge efficiency, electricity structure, and glider lightweight level, life cycle BEVs based on the four different batteries show substantial environmental benefits for four environmental impact categories.
Record ID
Keywords
battery electrical vehicle (BEV), global warming potential (GWP), life cycle assessment, lithium-ion power battery, prediction analysis, sensitivity analysis
Subject
Suggested Citation
Yang Y, Lan L, Hao Z, Zhao J, Luo G, Fu P, Chen Y. Life Cycle Prediction Assessment of Battery Electrical Vehicles with Special Focus on Different Lithium-Ion Power Batteries in China. (2023). LAPSE:2023.10762
Author Affiliations
Yang Y: College of Transportation Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Lan L: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China [ORCID]
Hao Z: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Zhao J: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Luo G: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Fu P: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China [ORCID]
Chen Y: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Lan L: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China [ORCID]
Hao Z: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Zhao J: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Luo G: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Fu P: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China [ORCID]
Chen Y: School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
15
Issue
15
First Page
5321
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-07-22
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en15155321, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.10762
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155321
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
319
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 27, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 27, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.10762
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.76 seconds)
