LAPSE:2023.30982v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.30982v1
Second-Life Battery Capacity Estimation and Method Comparison
April 17, 2023
Abstract
There is increased talk about using second-life batteries in applications. In first-life applications, the batteries start from new, and a range of life cycle estimation techniques are applied. However, it is not clear how second-life batteries should be monitored compared to first life batteries. This paper investigated different algorithms from first-life applications for estimating and forecasting battery cell state of health in conjunction with capacity calculations using second life cells under long term durability testing. The paper looks at how close these models predict capacity fade based on a set of second-life batteries that have been undertaking sweat testing over six different applications. The paper concludes that there are two methods that could be suitable candidates for predicting lifespan. One of these needed to be modified from the original.
There is increased talk about using second-life batteries in applications. In first-life applications, the batteries start from new, and a range of life cycle estimation techniques are applied. However, it is not clear how second-life batteries should be monitored compared to first life batteries. This paper investigated different algorithms from first-life applications for estimating and forecasting battery cell state of health in conjunction with capacity calculations using second life cells under long term durability testing. The paper looks at how close these models predict capacity fade based on a set of second-life batteries that have been undertaking sweat testing over six different applications. The paper concludes that there are two methods that could be suitable candidates for predicting lifespan. One of these needed to be modified from the original.
Record ID
Keywords
capacity estimation, capacity fade remaining useful life, Energy Storage, second-life battery
Subject
Suggested Citation
Yang J, Beatty M, Strickland D, Abedi-Varnosfaderani M, Warren J. Second-Life Battery Capacity Estimation and Method Comparison. (2023). LAPSE:2023.30982v1
Author Affiliations
Yang J: Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
Beatty M: Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
Strickland D: Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK [ORCID]
Abedi-Varnosfaderani M: Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
Warren J: PowerVault Ltd., Garrick Industrial Centre, Garrick Industrial Estate, Irving Way, London NW9 6AQ, UK
Beatty M: Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
Strickland D: Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK [ORCID]
Abedi-Varnosfaderani M: Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
Warren J: PowerVault Ltd., Garrick Industrial Centre, Garrick Industrial Estate, Irving Way, London NW9 6AQ, UK
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
16
Issue
7
First Page
3244
Year
2023
Publication Date
2023-04-04
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en16073244, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.30982v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073244
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
380
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 17, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 17, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.30982v1
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
