LAPSE:2023.30241
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.30241
Integrative Scenario Assessment as a Tool to Support Decisions in Energy Transition
April 14, 2023
Abstract
Energy scenarios represent a prominent tool to support energy system transitions towards sustainability. In order to better fulfil this role, two elements are widely missing in previous work on designing, analyzing, and using scenarios: First, a more systematic integration of social and socio-technical characteristics of energy systems in scenario design, and, second, a method to apply an accordingly enhanced set of indicators in scenario assessment. In this article, an integrative scenario assessment methodology is introduced that combines these two requirements. It consists of: (i) A model-based scenario analysis using techno-economic and ecological indicators; (ii) a non-model-based analysis using socio-technical indicators; (iii) an assessment of scenario performances with respect to pre-determined indicator targets; (iv) a normalization method to make the two types of results (model-based and non-model-based) comparable; (v) an approach to classify results to facilitate structured interpretation. The combination of these elements represents the added-value of this methodology. It is illustrated for selected indicators, and exemplary results are presented. Methodological challenges and remaining questions, e.g., regarding the analysis of non-model-based indicators, resource requirements, or the robustness of the methodology are pointed out and discussed. We consider this integrative methodology being a substantial improvement of previous scenario assessment methodologies.
Energy scenarios represent a prominent tool to support energy system transitions towards sustainability. In order to better fulfil this role, two elements are widely missing in previous work on designing, analyzing, and using scenarios: First, a more systematic integration of social and socio-technical characteristics of energy systems in scenario design, and, second, a method to apply an accordingly enhanced set of indicators in scenario assessment. In this article, an integrative scenario assessment methodology is introduced that combines these two requirements. It consists of: (i) A model-based scenario analysis using techno-economic and ecological indicators; (ii) a non-model-based analysis using socio-technical indicators; (iii) an assessment of scenario performances with respect to pre-determined indicator targets; (iv) a normalization method to make the two types of results (model-based and non-model-based) comparable; (v) an approach to classify results to facilitate structured interpretation. The combination of these elements represents the added-value of this methodology. It is illustrated for selected indicators, and exemplary results are presented. Methodological challenges and remaining questions, e.g., regarding the analysis of non-model-based indicators, resource requirements, or the robustness of the methodology are pointed out and discussed. We consider this integrative methodology being a substantial improvement of previous scenario assessment methodologies.
Record ID
Keywords
cross-impact balance, decision support, energy system model, integrative assessment, normalization method, semi-quantitative analysis, socio-technical scenarios, sustainability assessment
Subject
Suggested Citation
Kopfmüller J, Weimer-Jehle W, Naegler T, Buchgeister J, Bräutigam KR, Stelzer V. Integrative Scenario Assessment as a Tool to Support Decisions in Energy Transition. (2023). LAPSE:2023.30241
Author Affiliations
Kopfmüller J: Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
Weimer-Jehle W: Center for Interdisciplinary Risk and Innovation Studies, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany [ORCID]
Naegler T: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute for Networked Energy Systems, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany [ORCID]
Buchgeister J: Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany [ORCID]
Bräutigam KR: Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
Stelzer V: Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
Weimer-Jehle W: Center for Interdisciplinary Risk and Innovation Studies, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany [ORCID]
Naegler T: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute for Networked Energy Systems, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany [ORCID]
Buchgeister J: Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany [ORCID]
Bräutigam KR: Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
Stelzer V: Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
14
Issue
6
First Page
1580
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-03-12
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en14061580, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.30241
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061580
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
339
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 14, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 14, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.30241
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.08 seconds)
[0.08 s]
