Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0536
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0536
Empirical survey among experts on the relevance of various criteria for optimizing modular electrolysis systems
Hannes Lange, Lucien Beisswenger, Daniel Erdmann, Isabell Viedt, Leon Urbas
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Electrolysis systems must be constructed from multiple stack units. This modular system of stack units (modular electrolysis system) requires systematic optimization of its composition. This optimization depends on numerous, and sometimes conflicting, criteria. While such criteria have already been evaluated for modular plants in the process industry, they must be re-assessed in the context of modular electrolysis systems. To address this challenge, an expert survey was conducted within two research networks (H2Giga and DECHEMA e.V. Research Network) and the VDMA P2X4A.The evaluation followed the two-stage process: After ranking the categories costs, flexibility, process engineering and time-to-process according to their overall importance a ranking of individual criteria within each category was conducted. The survey reveals a clear prioritisation: costs are in first place with 35.9%, followed by flexibility (25.4%), process technology (23.2%) time to process (15.4%). This ranking provides a structured overview of the most important factors guiding the optimisation of modular electrolysis systems. Another finding of the survey is how electrolysis systems should be operated in the future. Here, the focus was primarily on electrolysis systems related to fluctuating renewable energies, with a top-2-box result of 81% in each case. Based on this prioritisation, weightings for possible application in multi-criteria optimisation can now be derived. This makes it possible to determine suitable compositions of electrolysis stack unit systems when scaling systems and to refine optimisation efforts. The expert survey thus contributes to the optimised design of electrolysis systems and thereby supports the ramp-up of hydrogen production.
Keywords
expert survey, modular electrolysis, modularization, process equipment assemblies, requirements prioritization
Suggested Citation
Lange H, Beisswenger L, Erdmann D, Viedt I, Urbas L. Empirical survey among experts on the relevance of various criteria for optimizing modular electrolysis systems. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2652-2657 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.163861
Author Affiliations
Lange H: TUD Dresden University of Technology, Process-to-Order Group, Helmholtzstraße 10, 01069 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Beisswenger L: VDMA e.V., Power-to-X for Applications, Lyoner Straße 18, 60528 Frankfurt, Hesse, Germany
Erdmann D: VDMA e.V., Power-to-X for Applications, Lyoner Straße 18, 60528 Frankfurt, Hesse, Germany
Viedt I: TUD Dresden University of Technology, Process-to-Order Group, Helmholtzstraße 10, 01069 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Urbas L: TUD Dresden University of Technology, Process-to-Order Group, Helmholtzstraße 10, 01069 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2652
Last Page
2657
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2652-2657-193-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0536
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.163861
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
4
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0536
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Lange H, Klose A, Beisswenger L, Erdmann D, Urbas L. Modularization approach for large-scale electrolysis systems: a review. Sustainable Energy Fuels 8:1208-1224 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1039/d3se01588b
  2. Lange H, Gro?e M, Viedt I, Urbas L. Modular and heterogeneous electrolysis systems: a system flexibility comparison. Systems and Control Transactions 4:759-764 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.177861
  3. Lange H, Meltzner FM, Große M, Viedt I, Klose A, Urbas L. Design of a modular and heterogeneous electrolysis system to increase flexibility in the use case of direct iron reduction. Energy Reports 15:108801 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.11.060
  4. Klose A, Merkelbach S, Menschner A, Hensel S, Heinze S, Bittorf L, Kockmann N, Schäfer C, Szmais S, Eckert M, Rüde T, Scherwietes T, da Silva Santos P, Stenger F, Holm T, Welscher W, Krink N, Schenk T, Stutz A, Maurmaier M, Stark K, Hoernicke M, Unland S, Erben S, Kessler F, Apitz F, Urbas L. Orchestration requirements for modular process plants in chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Chem Eng & Technol 42:2282-2291 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201900298
  5. VDI 2776-1:2020. Verfahrenstechnische Anlagen - Modulare Anlagen - Grundlagen und Planung modularer Anlagen 2020.
  6. Schindel , Polyakova , Harding , Weinhold , Stenger , Grünewald , Bramsiepe . General approach for technology and process equipment assembly (PEA) selection in process design. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 159:108223 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2020.108223
  7. Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space. H2Giga. H2Giga Flagship Proj Aims Mass Prod Electrolysers Prod Scale- Hydrog 2026. https://www.wasserstoff-leitprojekte.de/projects/h2giga (accessed January 28, 2026).
  8. Simos J. Evaluer l'impact sur l'environnement, une approche originale par l'analyse multicritère et la négociation. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes; 1990.
  9. Riese J, Grünewald M. Challenges and opportunities to enhance flexibility in design and operation of chemical processes. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 92:1887-1897 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.202000057
  10. Lange H, Klose A, Lippmann W, Urbas L. Technical evaluation of the flexibility of water electrolysis systems to increase energy flexibility: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 48:15771-15783 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.044
(0.09 seconds)

[0.09 s]