Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0519
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0519
Utilization of Additional Equipment Information for Drift Diagnosis in Chemical Plants
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Predictive maintenance is a promising approach to increase safety and productivity in chemical plants. One notoriously difficult problem in predictive maintenance are hard to predetermine, non-deterministic changes such as drifts. The term "drift" can be found with different definitions in this context. Therefore, it is defined here as changes in variables and parameters that occur orders of magnitude slower than the nominal process dynamics and are not directly measurable. Previous research resulted in a hybrid method that detects and diagnoses drifts from two sources: process and equipment. This method combines model-based and statistical approaches and additional information from the equipment, such as measurement gain or power consumption, is envisioned to reduce uncertainty about the drift cause [1]. First case studies revealed significant problems regarding economically viable integration of additional information. These problems arise due to the amount of information in scenarios with multiple devices, making analysis costly and time-consuming. For solving these problems, an automated evaluation of the information is introduced. It analyzes which additional equipment information is most relevant to distinguish between different drifts, based on sensitivity analyses. Additionally, a drift index - a unique mathematical label for drifts - is defined. The extended method is then successfully applied to a scenario closer to the reality in chemical plants with multiple adjacent devices. It is shown that the additional information is evaluated automatically and drifts are diagnosed more efficiently than in the previous method.
Keywords
Additional Information, Drift Diagnosis, Fault Detection, Predictive Maintenance, Process Monitoring
Suggested Citation
Eydam L, Lorenz J, Urbas L. Utilization of Additional Equipment Information for Drift Diagnosis in Chemical Plants. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2527-2533 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.168714
Author Affiliations
Eydam L: TU Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process Systems Engineering Group, Dresden, 01069 Germany [ORCID]
Lorenz J: TU Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Chair of Process Control Systems, Dresden, 01069 Germany [ORCID]
Urbas L: TU Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process Systems Engineering Group, Dresden, 01069 Germany. TU Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Chair of Process Control Systems, Dresden, 01069 Germany [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2527
Last Page
2533
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2527-2533-440-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0519
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.168714
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
47
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0519
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Eydam L, Furtner L, Lorenz J, Urbas L. Differentiation between process and equipment drifts in chemical plants. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1396-1402 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.124377
  2. Tan JS, Kramer MA. A general framework for preventive maintenance optimization in chemical process operations. Computers & Chemical Engineering 21:1451-1469 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-1354(97)88493-1
  3. Hashemian HM. State-of-the-art predictive maintenance techniques. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 60:226-236 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2010.2047662
  4. Selim MM, Althobaiti S, Ismail HMA, Mohamed SMY. Design of an optimized sensor fault identification within the limited computing, memory, and energy capabilities. AIP Advances 14: (2024) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0216212
  5. V. Venkatasubramanian, R. Rengaswamy, S. N. Kavuri, and K. Yin, "A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part I: Quantitative model-based methods, " Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00160-6.
  6. J. de Caigny, T. Himmelsbach, and R. Huck, "NOA-Konzept, NE 175, " in NAMUR Open Architecture (NOA) Das Konzept zur Öffnung der Prozessautomatisierung, T. Tauchnitz, Ed., Essen: Vulkan Verlag, 2021, pp. 5-9.
  7. Rahm L, Lorenz J, Khaydarov V, Maywald T, Glas T, Urbas L. Predictive maintenance with NOA: application and insights for rotating equipment. 2020 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) :761-767 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/etfa46521.2020.9212014
  8. Pianosi F, Beven K, Freer J, Hall JW, Rougier J, Stephenson DB, Wagener T. Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: a systematic review with practical workflow. Environmental Modelling & Software 79:214-232 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008
(0.09 seconds)

[0.09 s]