Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0512
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0512
Connecting the Dots: A Graph-based Approach for Unsupervised Learning and Adaptive Process Monitoring with LLM-assisted Fault Diagnosis
June 12, 2026
Abstract
The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and chemical process systems engineering is creating unprecedented opportunities to transform current refineries from conventionally operated plants into intelligent, automated, and resilient systems. However, the practical deployment of AI in these complex industrial environments faces several critical challenges. First, most existing process datasets contain minimal labeled data, making it difficult to apply supervised learning techniques that require extensive annotations to generate meaningful insights. Furthermore, refinery data typically consists of high-dimensional, multivariate time series, which pose additional complexities in capturing temporal dynamics and system interactions. Traditional Fault Detection and Diagnosis (FDD) frameworks often struggle to address these complexities, lacking adaptability to evolving process conditions, scalability to large plant networks, and explainability in their diagnostic reasoning. To address these gaps, we propose an integrated framework for unsupervised knowledge discovery, adaptive process monitoring, and AI-assisted fault diagnosis. The approach combines Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) with graph-based layout algorithms to extract and visualize temporal structures and similarities within complex process datasets. The resulting graphs function as an unsupervised model, enabling the identification of operational regimes through process clustering. These models can be deployed online to detect anomalies using adaptive fault thresholding, ensuring robustness to changing process dynamics. When faults are detected, the framework leverages large language models (LLMs) as AI assistants to support fault diagnosis. By bridging domain knowledge-such as piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) and signal flow diagrams-with data-driven insights, including machine learning metrics and feature contribution scores, the system delivers explainable and accurate diagnostic outputs. This hybrid methodology enhances interpretability and decision-making, offering a scalable and adaptive solution for next-generation AI-enabled refinery operations.
Keywords
Fault Detection, Graph Networks, LLMs, Machine Learning, Unsupervised Learning
Suggested Citation
Territo K, Romagnoli J. Connecting the Dots: A Graph-based Approach for Unsupervised Learning and Adaptive Process Monitoring with LLM-assisted Fault Diagnosis. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2473-2480 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.104309
Author Affiliations
Territo K: Louisiana State University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Baton Rouge, LA, United States [ORCID]
Romagnoli J: Louisiana State University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Baton Rouge, LA, United States [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2473
Last Page
2480
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2473-2480-243-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0512
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.104309
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
2
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0512
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Venkatasubramanian V, Chakraborty A. Quo vadis chatgpt? from large language models to large knowledge models. Computers & Chemical Engineering 192:108895 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108895
  2. Romagnoli JA, Briceño-Mena L, Manee V. AI in chemical engineering. CRC Press (2024) https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003455905
  3. Olaizola I, Quartulli M, Unzueta E, Goicolea J, Flórez J. Refinery 4.0, a review of the main challenges of the industry 4.0 paradigm in oil & gas downstream. Sensors 22:9164 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239164
  4. Ghobakhloo M. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 252:119869 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869
  5. Maslej, N., Fattorini, L., Perrault, R., Gil, Y., Parli, V., Kariuki, N., Capstick, E., Reuel, A., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J. and Ligett, K., 2025. Artificial intelligence index report 2025. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07139.
  6. Itakura F. Minimum prediction residual principle applied to speech recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. 23:67-72 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1975.1162641
  7. Sakoe H, Chiba S. Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. 26:43-49 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1978.1163055
  8. Tavenard, R., Faouzi, J., Vandewiele, G., Divo, F., Androz, G., Holtz, C., Payne, M., Yurchak, R., Rußwurm, M., Kolar, K. and Woods, E., 2020. Tslearn, a machine learning toolkit for time series data. Journal of machine learning research, 21(118).
  9. Hagberg AA, Schult DA, Swart PJ. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkx. Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference :11-15 (2008) https://doi.org/10.25080/tcwv9851
  10. Fruchterman T. M. J., Reingold E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129-1164.
(0.08 seconds)

[0.08 s]