Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0482v1
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0482v1
Multi-Objective Optimisation of Pressure Swing Adsorption Systems via Symbolic Regression
Carine Menezes Rebello, Amilton Barbosa Botelho Junior, Anderson Rapello Dos Santos, Idelfonso B. R. Nogueira
June 12, 2026
Abstract
This work explores symbolic regression (SR) as an interpretable surrogate modelling approach for the multi-objective optimisation of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) systems for CO2 capture. A first-principle model was used as a virtual plant to generate synthetic datasets covering the operating space defined by cycle step durations. Two surrogate frameworks were developed and compared: SR models derived through evolutionary search and deep neural networks (DNNs) trained via Hyperband-based tuning. Both surrogates were used as simulation models within an optimisation procedure based on a particle swarm optimisation (PSO) algorithm to maximise CO2 purity and recovery. While DNNs achieved the lowest prediction errors (MSE ˜ 10-6), the SR surrogates provided compact analytical representations and significantly faster optimisation. The SR framework yielded a denser and more diverse Pareto front (4345 vs 508 points). It was about 34 times faster (38.6 s vs 1331 s), confirming its efficiency for surrogate-based optimisation of cyclic adsorption processes.
Keywords
multi-objective optimisation, optimality, PSA, surrogate models, symbolic regression
Suggested Citation
Rebello CM, Botelho Junior AB, Dos Santos AR, Nogueira IBR. Multi-Objective Optimisation of Pressure Swing Adsorption Systems via Symbolic Regression. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2234-2242 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.116143
Author Affiliations
Rebello CM: Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Botelho Junior AB: Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Dos Santos AR: Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (PETROBRAS), Wells/Well Engineering, Brazil.. Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Department of Mechanical Engineering (DEM), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Nogueira IBR: Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2234
Last Page
2242
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2234-2242-388-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0482v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.116143
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
380
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0482v1
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Angelis D, Sofos F, Karakasidis TE. Artificial intelligence in physical sciences: symbolic regression trends and perspectives. Arch Computat Methods Eng 30:3845-3865 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09922-z
  2. Capra, F., Gazzani, M., Joss, L., Mazzotti, M., and Martelli, E. (2018). MO-MCS, a derivative-free algorithm for the multiobjective optimisation of adsorption processes. Technical report.
  3. Costa EA, Rebello CM, Schnitman L, Loureiro JM, Ribeiro AM, Nogueira IBR. Adaptive digital twin for pressure swing adsorption systems: integrating a novel feedback tracking system, online learning and uncertainty assessment for enhanced performance. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 127:107364 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107364
  4. Cozad A, Sahinidis NV, Miller DC. Learning surrogate models for simulation?based optimization. AIChE Journal 60:2211-2227 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14418
  5. De Witte N, Denayer JFM, Van Assche TRC. Effect of adsorption duration and purge flowrate on pressure swing adsorption performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60:13684-13691 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02291
  6. Ben-Mansour R, Habib MA, Bamidele OE, Basha M, Qasem NAA, Peedikakkal A, Laoui T, Ali M. Carbon capture by physical adsorption: materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations - a review. Applied Energy 161:225-255 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.011
  7. Hale WT, Safikou E, Bollas GM. Inference of faults through symbolic regression of system data. Computers & Chemical Engineering 157:107619 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107619
  8. Hu W, Zhang L. First-principles, machine learning and symbolic regression modelling for organic molecule adsorption on two-dimensional cao surface. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 124:108530 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2023.108530
  9. Kalman V, Voigt J, Jordan C, Harasek M. Hydrogen purification by pressure swing adsorption: high-pressure PSA performance in recovery from seasonal storage. Sustainability 14:14037 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114037
  10. Kamin Z, Bahrun MHV, Bono A. A short review on pressure swing adsorption (PSA) technology for nitrogen generation from air. AIP Conference Proceedings 2656:050006 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0099702
  11. Kay H, Kay S, Mowbray M, Lane A, Mendoza C, Martin P, Zhang D. Constructing a symbolic regression-based interpretable soft sensor for industrial data analytics and product quality control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 63:4083-4092 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c04021
  12. Khajuria H, Pistikopoulos EN. Optimization and control of pressure swing adsorption processes under uncertainty. AIChE Journal 59:120-131 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.13783
  13. Leperi KT, Yancy-Caballero D, Snurr RQ, You F. 110th anniversary: surrogate models based on artificial neural networks to simulate and optimize pressure swing adsorption cycles for co2 capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58:18241-18252 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02383
  14. Li, L., Jamieson, K., DeSalvo, G., Rostamizadeh, A., & Talwalkar, A. (2018). Hyperband: A novel bandit-based approach to hyperparameter optimization. Journal of machine learning research, 18(185), 1-52.
  15. Luberti M, Ahn H. Review of polybed pressure swing adsorption for hydrogen purification. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:10911-10933 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.147
  16. Makke N, Chawla S. Interpretable scientific discovery with symbolic regression: a review. Artif Intell Rev 57: (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10622-0
  17. Nikolaidis, G.N., Kikkinides, E.S., and Georgiadis, M.C. (2015). Modelling and simulation of pressure swing adsorption (psa) processes for post-combustion carbon dioxide (co2) capture from flue gas. In K.V. Gernaey, J.K. Huusom, and R. Gani (eds.), 12th.
  18. International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering and 25th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, volume 37 of Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 287-292. Elsevier. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63578-5.50043-8
  19. Nikolaidis GN, Kikkinides ES, Georgiadis MC. Model-based approach for the evaluation of materials and processes for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture from flue gas by PSA/VSA processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55:635-646 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02845
  20. Nogueira IBR, Dias ROM, Rebello CM, Costa EA, Santana VV, Rodrigues AE, Ferreira A, Ribeiro AM. A novel nested loop optimization problem based on deep neural networks and feasible operation regions definition for simultaneous material screening and process optimization. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 180:243-253 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.02.013
  21. Panerati J, Schnellmann MA, Patience C, Beltrame G, Patience GS. Experimental methods in chemical engineering: artificial neural networks-anns. Can J Chem Eng 97:2372-2382 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23507
  22. Quade M, Abel M, Shafi K, Niven RK, Noack BR. Prediction of dynamical systems by symbolic regression. Phys. Rev. E 94: (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.94.012214
  23. Rebello CM, Costa EA, Fontana M, Schnitman L, Nogueira IBR. Interpretable scientific machine learning approach for correcting phenomenological models: methodology validation on an ESP prototype. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 63:19030-19050 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02104
  24. Rebello CM, Nogueira IBR. Optimizing 2 capture in pressure swing adsorption units: a deep neural network approach with optimality evaluation and operating maps for decision-making. Separation and Purification Technology 340:126811 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.126811
  25. Scheffold L, Finkler T, Piechottka U. Gray-box system modeling using symbolic regression and nonlinear model predictive control of a semibatch polymerization. Computers & Chemical Engineering 146:107204 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.107204
  26. Subraveti SG, Li Z, Prasad V, Rajendran A. Machine learning-based multiobjective optimization of pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58:20412-20422 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04173
  27. Sofronova E, Diveev A. Universal approach to solution of optimization problems by symbolic regression. Applied Sciences 11:5081 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115081
  28. Tian T, Wang Y, Liu B, Ding Z, Xu X, Shi M, Ma J, Zhang Y, Zhang D. Simulation and experiment of six-bed PSA process for air separation with rotating distribution valve. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 42:329-337 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2021.03.027
  29. Tonda A. Review of pysr: high-performance symbolic regression in python and julia. Genet Program Evolvable Mach 26: (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-024-09503-4
  30. Ward A, Pini R. Efficient bayesian optimization of industrial-scale pressure-vacuum swing adsorption processes for co2 capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 61:13650-13668 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c02313
  31. Zhang R, Shen Y, Tang Z, Li W, Zhang D. A review of numerical research on the pressure swing adsorption process. Processes 10:812 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050812
(0.1 seconds)

[0.1 s]