LAPSE:2026.0424v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0424v1
A Large Language Model Enhanced Fault Diagnosis Framework for Chemical Processes
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Fault diagnosis is essential for ensuring safety and efficiency in chemical process industries. Conventional diagnostic systems often generate raw numerical outputs that require extensive human interpretation, increasing the operator's workload and slowing decision-making during abnormal events. To overcome these limitations, this work introduces a model context protocol (MCP)-integrated fault diagnosis framework, where a Large Language Model (LLM) functions as the MCP client, coordinating multiple diagnostic tools through a unified protocol. Within the proposed framework, the LLM interacts with specialized diagnostic tools, including a convolutional neural network-based fault diagnosis model and an ensemble-based variant for uncertainty-aware analysis. The LLM synthesizes the outputs of these tools and generates operator-oriented natural-language reports that summarize diagnostic results and explicitly communicate uncertainty, thereby supporting more transparent and efficient decision-making.A benchmarking study based on the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process is conducted to evaluate the framework using multiple LLMs under identical settings. The evaluation assesses diagnostic accuracy, tool adherence, and operator report quality using an LLM-as-a-judge methodology. Experimental results show that LLM performance varies significantly across models, and that reliable tool calling and uncertainty-aware reasoning are more critical than model size for effective fault diagnosis assistance.Overall, the proposed framework demonstrates strong potential for enhancing fault diagnosis workflows in chemical processes by improving usability, interpretability, and decision-making efficiency without modifying existing diagnostic algorithms.
Fault diagnosis is essential for ensuring safety and efficiency in chemical process industries. Conventional diagnostic systems often generate raw numerical outputs that require extensive human interpretation, increasing the operator's workload and slowing decision-making during abnormal events. To overcome these limitations, this work introduces a model context protocol (MCP)-integrated fault diagnosis framework, where a Large Language Model (LLM) functions as the MCP client, coordinating multiple diagnostic tools through a unified protocol. Within the proposed framework, the LLM interacts with specialized diagnostic tools, including a convolutional neural network-based fault diagnosis model and an ensemble-based variant for uncertainty-aware analysis. The LLM synthesizes the outputs of these tools and generates operator-oriented natural-language reports that summarize diagnostic results and explicitly communicate uncertainty, thereby supporting more transparent and efficient decision-making.A benchmarking study based on the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process is conducted to evaluate the framework using multiple LLMs under identical settings. The evaluation assesses diagnostic accuracy, tool adherence, and operator report quality using an LLM-as-a-judge methodology. Experimental results show that LLM performance varies significantly across models, and that reliable tool calling and uncertainty-aware reasoning are more critical than model size for effective fault diagnosis assistance.Overall, the proposed framework demonstrates strong potential for enhancing fault diagnosis workflows in chemical processes by improving usability, interpretability, and decision-making efficiency without modifying existing diagnostic algorithms.
Record ID
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Fault Detection, Large Language Model
Subject
Suggested Citation
Liang J, Sin G. A Large Language Model Enhanced Fault Diagnosis Framework for Chemical Processes. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1769-1775 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.118894
Author Affiliations
Liang J: Process and Systems Engineering Center (PROSYS), Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [ORCID]
Sin G: Process and Systems Engineering Center (PROSYS), Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Sin G: Process and Systems Engineering Center (PROSYS), Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1769
Last Page
1775
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1769-1775-446-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0424v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.118894
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
428
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0424v1
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Bi X, Qin R, Wu D, Zheng S, Zhao J. One step forward for smart chemical process fault detection and diagnosis. Computers & Chemical Engineering 164:107884 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107884
- Taqvi SAA, Zabiri H, Tufa LD, Uddin F, Fatima SA, Maulud AS. A review on data?driven learning approaches for fault detection and diagnosis in chemical processes. ChemBioEng Reviews 8:239-259 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.202000027
- Deng X, Zhang Z. Nonlinear chemical process fault diagnosis using ensemble deep support vector data description. Sensors 20:4599 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164599
- Lomov I, Lyubimov M, Makarov I, Zhukov LE. Fault detection in tennessee eastman process with temporal deep learning models. Journal of Industrial Information Integration 23:100216 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100216
- Shi T, Yang A, Jin Y, Ren J, Shen W, Dong L, Man Y. Artificial intelligence in process systems engineering. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Process Systems Engineering :1-10 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-821092-5.00010-3
- Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, et al. Attention Is All You Need 2023 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
- Cao Y, Griffiths T, Narasimhan K, Shafran I, Yao S, Yu D, Zhao J. Tree of thoughts: deliberate problem solving with large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 :11809-11822 (2023) https://doi.org/10.52202/075280-0517
- Ferrag MA, Tihanyi N, Debbah M. From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review 2025 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.19678
- Caccavale F, Gargalo CL, Kager J, Larsen S, Gernaey KV, Krühne U. Chatgmp: a case of AI chatbots in chemical engineering education towards the automation of repetitive tasks. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 8:100354 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100354
- Liang J, Groll N, Sin G. Large Language Model Agent for User-friendly Chemical Process Simulations 2026 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.11650
- Zeng T, Badrinarayanan S, Ock J, Lai C-K, Farimani AB. LLM-guided Chemical Process Optimization with a Multi-Agent Approach 2025 https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2506.20921
- Khan A, Nahar R, Chen H, Constante Flores GE, Li C. Faultexplainer: leveraging large language models for interpretable fault detection and diagnosis. Computers & Chemical Engineering 199:109152 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109152
- Gu J, Jiang X, Shi Z, Tan H, Zhai X, Xu C, Li W, Shen Y, Ma S, Liu H, Wang S, Zhang K, Lin Z, Zhang B, Ni L, Gao W, Wang Y, Guo J. A survey on llm-as-a-judge. The Innovation :101253 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2025.101253
- Liang J, Sin G. Enhancing fault diagnosis for chemical processes via MSCNN with hyperparameters optimization. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1712-1717 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.181373
- What is the Model Context Protocol (MCP)? Model Context Protoc n.d. https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/getting-started/intro (accessed December 3, 2025).
- Melo A, Câmara MM, Clavijo N, Pinto JC. Open benchmarks for assessment of process monitoring and fault diagnosis techniques: a review and critical analysis. Computers & Chemical Engineering 165:107964 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107964
(0.12 seconds)
[0.12 s]

