Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0283v1
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0283v1
A Generative AI Approach to Inverse Design for Continuous Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing (CM) offers improved quality assurance, operational agility, and supply resilience, yet process development remains dominated by expensive trial-and-error experimentation and high-dimensional space exploration. Motivated by ICH Q13, we develop a generative inverse-design framework that maps target product quality to feasible process recipes for an integrated twin-screw wet granulation and segmented fluidized-bed drying line. The framework integrates three components: (i) a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) generator that proposes process parameter sets conditioned on desired Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), (ii) a Gaussian Process (GP) surrogate validator that screens candidates for manufacturing feasibility, and (iii) SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret the generated designs. Training data were produced from a validated gPROMS digital twin of the Diamond Pilot Plant (DiPP) ConsiGma-25 line, covering liquid -to-solid ratio, drying temperature, drying time and air flowrate, with CQAs including granule moisture content, average particle size and porosity. The trained CVAE generated ~50, 000 candidate recipes and learned constrained feasible regions of the design space. Across seven operating scenarios, generated recipes achieved low deviations from targets. For a target-center case, deviations were 2.0% (moisture), 0.4% (particle size) and 0.5% (porosity). Edge cases remained acceptable, with the largest deviation observed for moisture in a high-moisture scenario (8.8%). SHAP analysis highlighted drying time and liquid-to-solid ratio as the dominant drivers of moisture, while liquid-to-solid ratio governed particle size and porosity. Overall, the approach enables rapid, explainable exploration of CM design spaces, reducing experimental burden and supporting QbD-aligned development for integrated continuous processes.
Keywords
Conditional Variational Autoencoder, Design space, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Inverse Design, Pharmaceutical manufacturing, Quality by Digital Design
Suggested Citation
Vega-Zambrano CDP, Charitopoulos VM. A Generative AI Approach to Inverse Design for Continuous Pharmaceutical Manufacturing. Systems and Control Transactions 5:648-654 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.157519
Author Affiliations
Vega-Zambrano CDP: Department of Chemical Engineering, The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK [ORCID]
Charitopoulos VM: Department of Chemical Engineering, The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
648
Last Page
654
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0648-0654-181-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0283v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.157519
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
204
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0283v1
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Pantelides CC, Pereira FE. The future of digital applications in pharmaceutical operations. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 45:101038 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2024.101038
  2. Jayakrishnan A, Phang HC, Ying Tan VX, Kee PE, Loke YH, Mod Razif MRF, Yee KM, Md Noh SM, Ming LC, Gan SH, Liew KB. Towards pharmaceutical industry 5.0: impact of artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. CPB 27: (2025) https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892010396035250710120501
  3. Nagy B, Galata DL, Farkas A, Nagy ZK. Application of artificial neural networks in the process analytical technology of pharmaceutical manufacturing-a review. AAPS J 24: (2022) https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-022-00706-0
  4. Destro F, Barolo M. A review on the modernization of pharmaceutical development and manufacturing - trends, perspectives, and the role of mathematical modeling. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 620:121715 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121715
  5. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products, Q13 (2022).
  6. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). ICH Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical Development (2009).
  7. Wang LG, Omar C, Litster J, Slade D, Li J, Salman A, Bellinghausen S, Barrasso D, Mitchell N. Model driven design for integrated twin screw granulator and fluid bed dryer via flowsheet modelling. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 628:122186 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122186
  8. Kingma DP, Welling M. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv:1312.6114 (2013) https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114
  9. Sohn K, Lee H, Yan X. Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 28 (2015).
  10. Fuhr AS, Sumpter BG. Deep generative models for materials discovery and machine learning-accelerated innovation. Front. Mater. 9: (2022) https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.865270
  11. Tong X, Liu X, Tan X, Li X, Jiang J, Xiong Z, Xu T, Jiang H, Qiao N, Zheng M. Generative models for de novo drug design. J. Med. Chem. 64:14011-14027 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00927
  12. Hornick T, Mao C, Koynov A, Yawman P, Thool P, Salish K, Giles M, Nagapudi K, Zhang S. In silico formulation optimization and particle engineering of pharmaceutical products using a generative artificial intelligence structure synthesis method. Nat Commun 15: (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54011-9
  13. Qian Y, Li S. Inverse design of particle shapes with target sphericity and packing fraction using variational autoencoders. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 162:112509 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112509
  14. Ma Y, Li W, Liu J, Shang G, Yang H, Gong J, Nagy ZK, Benyahia B. Digital design and optimization of the integrated synthesis and crystallization process using data?driven approaches. AIChE Journal 71: (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.18931
  15. Lundberg SM, Lee S-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 30 (2017) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874
  16. Siemens Process Systems Engineering, 2025. gPROMS.https://www.psenterprise.com/products/gproms.
  17. Bratley P, Fox BL. Algorithm 659. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 14:88-100 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1145/42288.214372
  18. Vega-Zambrano C, Diangelakis NA, Charitopoulos VM. Data-driven model predictive control for continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 672:125322 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125322
  19. Geremia M, Bezzo F, Ierapetritou MG. Design space determination of pharmaceutical processes: effects of control strategies and uncertainty. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 194:159-169 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.12.008
  20. Bano G, Facco P, Ierapetritou M, Bezzo F, Barolo M. Design space maintenance by online model adaptation in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Computers & Chemical Engineering 127:254-271 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.05.019
  21. Meng Q, Bogle D, Charitopoulos VM. Probabilistic design space exploration and optimization via bayesian approach for a fluid bed drying process. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 210:107116 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107116
  22. Chiplunkar R, Pauzi SM, Sachio S, Papathanasiou MM, Kontoravdi C. Probabilistic design space identification for upstream bioprocesses under limited data availability?. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2561-2567 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.166359
  23. Boukouvala F, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG. Design space of pharmaceutical processes using data-driven-based methods. J Pharm Innov 5:119-137 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-010-9086-y
(0.15 seconds)

[0.16 s]