Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0267v1
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0267v1
Electrified refineries in the Power Flow Network
Sampriti Chattopadhyay, Ana I. Torres, Ignacio E. Grossmann, Saif R Kazi
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Industrial decarbonization has heightened interest in electrifying major chemical processes, but existing planning methods typically assume fixed electricity prices and overlook how industrial power use affects the grid. This work introduces a grid-aware optimization framework that captures two-way interactions between industrial electricity usage and the power flows within the grid. We use the DC Optimal Power Flow (DC-OPF) model to generate Locational Marginal Prices across refinery demand levels and embed a surrogate reflecting the relationship between the power demand and the prices into an operational optimization problem for a partially electrified refinery. The surrogate model is embedded within the optimization problem using disjunctive reformulations and off-the-shelf packages such as OMLT (Optimization and Machine Learning Toolkit). In a case study considering an oil refinery with installed electric boilers, electrolyzers, H2 storage, and post-combustion carbon capture infrastructure, the grid-aware approach lowers operating costs by 7% relative to a price-taker model by anticipating how the refinery's own demand shifts electricity prices. The method is also shown to incorporate the effect of demand uncertainty at other grid nodes by embedding a surrogate model trained using data generated by a chance-constrained DC Optimal Power Flow.
Keywords
Electricity & Electrical Devices, Energy Systems, Process Operations, Refining, Surrogate Model
Suggested Citation
Chattopadhyay S, Torres AI, Grossmann IE, Kazi SR. Electrified refineries in the Power Flow Network. Systems and Control Transactions 5:514-525 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.116194
Author Affiliations
Chattopadhyay S: Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh 15213, PA, USA
Torres AI: Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh 15213, PA, USA
Grossmann IE: Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh 15213, PA, USA
Kazi SR: Applied Mathematics & Plasma Physics Group, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
514
Last Page
525
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0514-0525-651-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0267v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.116194
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
24
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0267v1
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Chattopadhyay S, Karthikeyan K, Gandhi R, Grossmann IE, Torres AI. Optimal retrofit of carbon capture and electrification technologies in oil refineries for reducing direct co2 emissions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 64:10131-10147 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04995
  2. Corengia M, Torres AI. Coupling time varying power sources to production of green-hydrogen: a superstructure based approach for technology selection and optimal design. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 183:235-249 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.05.007
  3. Giannikopoulos I, Skouteris A, Allen DT, Baldea M, Stadtherr MA. Thermal electrification of chemical processes using renewable energy: economic and decarbonization impacts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 63:12064-12082 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c00737
  4. Demirhan CD, Tso WW, Powell JB, Pistikopoulos EN. A multi-scale energy systems engineering approach towards integrated multi-product network optimization. Applied Energy 281:116020 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116020
  5. Jabari F, Mohammadi-ivatloo B, Mohammadpourfard M. Robust optimal self-scheduling of potable water and power producers under uncertain electricity prices. Applied Thermal Engineering 162:114258 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114258
  6. Attarha A, Amjady N, Dehghan S, Vatani B. Adaptive robust self-scheduling for a wind producer with compressed air energy storage. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 9:1659-1671 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2018.2806444
  7. Kazempour J, Hobbs BF. Value of flexible resources, virtual bidding, and self-scheduling in two-settlement electricity markets with wind generation-part I: principles and competitive model. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33:749-759 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2699687
  8. Martinek J, Jorgenson J, Mehos M, Denholm P. A comparison of price-taker and production cost models for determining system value, revenue, and scheduling of concentrating solar power plants. Applied Energy 231:854-865 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.136
  9. Orvis R, Aggarwal S. Refining competitive electricity market rules to unlock flexibility. The Electricity Journal 31:31-37 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2018.05.012
  10. Gao X, Knueven B, Siirola JD, Miller DC, Dowling AW. Multiscale simulation of integrated energy system and electricity market interactions. Applied Energy 316:119017 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119017
  11. Jalving J, Ghouse J, Cortes N, Gao X, Knueven B, Agi D, Martin S, Chen X, Guittet D, Tumbalam-Gooty R, Bianchi L, Beattie K, Gunter D, Siirola JD, Miller DC, Dowling AW. Beyond price taker: conceptual design and optimization of integrated energy systems using machine learning market surrogates. Applied Energy 351:121767 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121767
  12. Shafiee S, Zamani-Dehkordi P, Zareipour H, Knight AM. Economic assessment of a price-maker energy storage facility in the alberta electricity market. Energy 111:537-547 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.086
  13. Arteaga J, Zareipour H. A price-maker/price-taker model for the operation of battery storage systems in electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10:6912-6920 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2019.2913818
  14. Nasrolahpour E, Kazempour SJ, Zareipour H, Rosehart WD. Strategic sizing of energy storage facilities in electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 7:1462-1472 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2016.2555289
  15. Hobbs BF, Metzler CB, Pang JS. Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: an MPEC approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15:638-645 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1109/59.867153
  16. Tang X, Petra CG, Baldea M, Baldick R. A grid-scale study of demand bidding by large industrial users. Computers & Chemical Engineering 205:109442 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109442
  17. Ammari BL, Johnson ES, Stinchfield G, Kim T, Bynum M, Hart WE, Pulsipher J, Laird CD. Linear model decision trees as surrogates in optimization of engineering applications. Computers & Chemical Engineering 178:108347 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108347
  18. Kondili E, Pantelides CC, Sargent RWH. A general algorithm for short-term scheduling of batch operations-i. MILP formulation. Computers & Chemical Engineering 17:211-227 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(93)80015-f
  19. Pantelides CC. Unified frameworks for the optimal process planning and scheduling. In: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Foundations of Computer Aided Operations. 253-274 (1994).
  20. Summers T, Warrington J, Morari M, Lygeros J. Stochastic optimal power flow based on convex approximations of chance constraints. 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference :1-7 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1109/pscc.2014.7038376
  21. Pena-Ordieres A, Molzahn DK, Roald LA, Wachter A. DC optimal power flow with joint chance constraints. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 36:147-158 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2020.3004023
  22. Roald L, Oldewurtel F, Krause T, Andersson G. Analytical reformulation of security constrained optimal power flow with probabilistic constraints. 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference :1-6 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/ptc.2013.6652224
  23. PJM Interconnection. (n.d.). Data Viewer: Real-Time & Day-Ahead LMP., from https://dataviewer.pjm.com/dataviewer/pages/public/lmp.jsf
  24. Mallapragada DS, Dvorkin Y, Modestino MA, Esposito DV, Smith WA, Hodge BM, Harold MP, Donnelly VM, Nuz A, Bloomquist C, Baker K, Grabow LC, Yan Y, Rajput NN, Hartman RL, Biddinger EJ, Aydil ES, Taylor AD. Decarbonization of the chemical industry through electrification: barriers and opportunities. Joule 7:23-41 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.12.008
(0.09 seconds)

[0.1 s]