Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0406v1
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0406v1
A data-driven hybrid multi-objective optimization framework for pressure swing adsorption systems
Siyang Ma, Jie Li
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) is an energy-efficient technology for gas separation, while the multi-objective optimization of PSA is a challenging task. To tackle this, we propose a hybrid optimization framework, which integrates three steps. In the first step, we establish surrogate models for the constraints using Gaussian processes (GPs) and employ multi-objective Bayesian optimization to search for feasible points that satisfy the constraints. In the second step, we establish surrogate models for the objective function and constraints using GPs and utilize constrained multi-objective Bayesian optimization to search for an approximate Pareto front. In the third step, we perform a local search based on the approximate Pareto front. By employing the trust region filter method, we construct quadratic models for each constraint and objective function and refine the Pareto front to achieve local optimality. This framework demonstrates the efficiency of Bayesian optimization and the local optimality of the trust region method. A comparison with the popular evolutionary algorithm, Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), showed that this framework had a higher hypervolume of the Pareto front while halving the runtime and reducing the number of simulations by a factor of 20.
Keywords
data-driven optimization, Machine Learning, multi-objective optimization, Pressure swing adsorption
Suggested Citation
Ma S, Li J. A data-driven hybrid multi-objective optimization framework for pressure swing adsorption systems. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1579-1585 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.123607
Author Affiliations
Ma S: Centre for Process Integration, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, the United Kingdom
Li J: Centre for Process Integration, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, the United Kingdom
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1579
Last Page
1585
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1579-1585-1647-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0406v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.123607
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
1053
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0406v1
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. K. Deb et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2):182-197 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
  2. N. S. Wilkins et al. Optimization of pressure-vacuum swing adsorption processes for nitrogen rejection from natural gas streams using a nitrogen selective metal organic framework. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 100(9):2374-93 (2022) https://10.1002/cjce.24469 https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.24469
  3. Z. Hao et al. Efficient hybrid multiobjective optimization of pressure swing adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 423:130248 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130248
  4. W. Adam & R. Pini. Efficient bayesian optimization of industrial-scale pressure-vacuum swing adsorption processes for CO2 capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 61(36):13650-13668 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c02313
  5. R. Haghpanah et al. Multiobjective optimization of a four-step adsorption process for postcombustion CO2 capture via finite volume simulation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52(11):4249-4265 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie302658y
  6. Y. Liao et al. Simulation and optimisation of vacuum (pressure) swing adsorption with simultaneous consideration of real vacuum pump data and bed fluidisation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 358:130354 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130354
  7. E. Bradford et al. Efficient multiobjective optimization employing Gaussian processes, spectral sampling and a genetic algorithm. J. Glob. Optim. 71(2): 407-438 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-018-0609-2
  8. J.R. Gardner et al. Bayesian optimization with inequality constraints. ICML 2014:937-945 (2014)
  9. K. Yang et al. Multi-objective Bayesian global optimization using expected hypervolume improvement gradient. Swarm Evol Comput. 44:945-956 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2018.10.007
  10. B. Manuel et al. Multi-Objective Trust-Region Filter Method for Nonlinear Constraints using Inexact Gradients. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.12094 (2022)
  11. C. Cartis et al. Improving the flexibility and robustness of model-based derivative-free optimization solvers. ACM Trans. Math. Software 45(3):1-41 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1145/3338517
(0.1 seconds)

[0.1 s]