LAPSE:2025.0283v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0283v1
Development of a hybrid, semi-parametric Simulation Model of an AEM Electrolysis Stack Unit for large-scale System Simulations
June 27, 2025
Abstract
A key technology for integrating fluctuating renewable energy into the process industry is the production of green hydrogen through water electrolysis plants. Scaling up electrolysis plant capacity remains a significant challenge for the renewable energy transition. System simulation of large-scale electrolysis plants can support process design, monitoring, optimization, and maintenance scheduling. Hybrid modeling methods are promising for improving simulation reliability by combining process knowledge with process data, addressing gaps in understanding of the underlying processes. These hybrid, semi-parametric models have shown improved accuracy than purely mechanistic models. This study develops a hybrid, semi-parametric model for an anion exchange membrane electrolysis (AEMEL) stack unit. Parameters such as heat loss and heat transfer, which cannot be directly measured, are estimated using real process data. Sensors provide data on lye tank temperature, outlet temperature, and flow rate, enabling estimation of heat transfer coefficients and losses. The hybrid model is validated against operational data from different load settings of the AEMEL stack unit. To test its scalability, a large-scale electrolysis plant configuration is simulated, comprising multiple AEMEL stack units, a water supply module. Performance accuracy and efficiency of the hybrid model are compared with the mechanistic model. This hybrid model lays the foundation for future use in efficient system simulations with surrogate models, potentially enhancing large-scale electrolysis plant performance and renewable energy integration.
A key technology for integrating fluctuating renewable energy into the process industry is the production of green hydrogen through water electrolysis plants. Scaling up electrolysis plant capacity remains a significant challenge for the renewable energy transition. System simulation of large-scale electrolysis plants can support process design, monitoring, optimization, and maintenance scheduling. Hybrid modeling methods are promising for improving simulation reliability by combining process knowledge with process data, addressing gaps in understanding of the underlying processes. These hybrid, semi-parametric models have shown improved accuracy than purely mechanistic models. This study develops a hybrid, semi-parametric model for an anion exchange membrane electrolysis (AEMEL) stack unit. Parameters such as heat loss and heat transfer, which cannot be directly measured, are estimated using real process data. Sensors provide data on lye tank temperature, outlet temperature, and flow rate, enabling estimation of heat transfer coefficients and losses. The hybrid model is validated against operational data from different load settings of the AEMEL stack unit. To test its scalability, a large-scale electrolysis plant configuration is simulated, comprising multiple AEMEL stack units, a water supply module. Performance accuracy and efficiency of the hybrid model are compared with the mechanistic model. This hybrid model lays the foundation for future use in efficient system simulations with surrogate models, potentially enhancing large-scale electrolysis plant performance and renewable energy integration.
Record ID
Keywords
Hybrid Modeling, Hydrogen, Modelling and Simulations, Modular Plants, System Simulation
Subject
Suggested Citation
Viedt I, Mock) MG(, Urbas L. Development of a hybrid, semi-parametric Simulation Model of an AEM Electrolysis Stack Unit for large-scale System Simulations. Systems and Control Transactions 4:818-823 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.129325
Author Affiliations
Viedt I: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process Systems Engineering Group; Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process-to-Order (P2O) Lab Learning Factory
Mock) MG(: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process Systems Engineering Group; Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process-to-Order (P2O) Lab Learning Factory
Urbas L: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process Systems Engineering Group; Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Chair of Process Control Systems; Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process-to-Orde
Mock) MG(: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process Systems Engineering Group; Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process-to-Order (P2O) Lab Learning Factory
Urbas L: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process Systems Engineering Group; Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Chair of Process Control Systems; Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process-to-Orde
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
818
Last Page
823
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0818-0823-1400-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0283v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.129325
Article DOI
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
689
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0283v1
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- VDI 2776 Blatt 1, Process engineering plants - Modular plants - Fundamentals and planning modular plants. 2020. Accessed: Apr. 29, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.vdi.de/richtlinien/details/vdi-2776-blatt-1-process-engineering-plants-modular-plants-fundamentals-and-planning-modular-plants
- Lange, H., Klose, A., Beisswenger, L., Erdmann, D., & Urbas, L. (2024). Modularization approach for large-scale electrolysis systems: a review. Sustainable Energy & Fuels https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SE01588B
- Mock, M., Viedt, I., Lange, H., & Urbas, L. (2024). Heterogenous electrolysis plants as enabler of efficient and flexible Power-to-X value chains. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering (Vol. 53, pp. 1885-1890). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50315-X
- Von Stosch, M., Oliveira, R., Peres, J., & de Azevedo, S. F. (2014). Hybrid semi-parametric modeling in process systems engineering: Past, present and future. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 60, 86-101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.08.008
- Große, M., Viedt, I., Lange, H., and Urbas, L., (2024). Electrolysis stack modeling for dynamic system simulation of modular hydrogen plants, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. (in review)
- Bruckner, L., Oppelt, M., Urbas, L., & Barth, M. (2020). The current and future use of simulation in discrete and process industries. Siemens AG
- Lorenz, J., Klose, A., Lange, H., Kock, T., & Urbas, L. (2023, September). Process control principles for scalable electrolysis systems. In 2023 IEEE 28th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) (pp. 1-4). IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA54631.2023.10275330
- Viedt, I., Gopa, K. R., Mädler, J., & Urbas, L. (2023). Quality assessment of partial models for co-simulation of modular electrolysis plants. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering (Vol. 52, pp. 1217-1222). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15274-0.50194-3
- Viedt, I., Lorenz, R., & Urbas, L. (2024). Case study on quality assurance of third-party models for co-simulation using FMI. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering (Vol. 53, pp. 3403-3408). Elsevier https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50568-8
- Glassey, J., & Von Stosch, M. (Eds.). (2018). Hybrid modeling in process industries. CRC Press https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351184373
- Bae, J., Lee, H. J., Jeong, D. H., & Lee, J. M. (2020). Construction of a valid domain for a hybrid model and its application to dynamic optimization with controlled exploration. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 59(37), 16380-16395 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02720
- D. Bonvin, C. Georgakis, C. C. Pantelides, M. Barolo, M. A. Grover, D. Rodrigues, ... and D. Dochain, 2016, Linking models and experiments, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res, 55, 25, 6891-6903 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04801
- Vincent, I., & Bessarabov, D. (2018). Low cost hydrogen production by anion exchange membrane electrolysis: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 1690-1704 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.258
- Sinnott, R., & Towler, G. (2019). Chemical engineering design: SI Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann
- Sakas, G., Ibáñez-Rioja, A., Ruuskanen, V., Kosonen, A., Ahola, J., & Bergmann, O. (2022). Dynamic energy and mass balance model for an industrial alkaline water electrolyzer plant process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(7), 4328-4345 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.126
- Nafchi, F. M., Afshari, E., & Baniasadi, E. (2024). Anion exchange membrane water electrolysis: Numerical modeling and electrochemical performance analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 52, 306-321 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.173
- An, L., Zhao, T. S., Chai, Z. H., Tan, P., & Zeng, L. (2014). Mathematical modeling of an anion-exchange membrane water electrolyzer for hydrogen production. international journal of hydrogen energy, 39(35), 19869-19876 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.025
- Vidales, A. G., Millan, N. C., & Bock, C. (2023). Modeling of anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers: The influence of operating parameters. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 194, 636-648 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.05.004
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Solar Power Data for Integration Studies 2024. https://www.nrel.gov/grid/solar-power-data.html (accessed November 14, 2024)
- Zerrougui, I., Li, Z., & Hissel, D. (2025). Physics-Informed Neural Network for modeling and predicting temperature fluctuations in proton exchange membrane electrolysis. Energy and AI, 100474 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100474
- Lange, H., Klose, A., Lippmann, W., & Urbas, L. (2023). Technical evaluation of the flexibility of water electrolysis systems to increase energy flexibility: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(42), 15771-15783 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.044

