LAPSE:2024.0950
Published Article

LAPSE:2024.0950
Dynamic Pressure Analysis of Shale Gas Wells Considering Three-Dimensional Distribution and Properties of the Hydraulic Fracture Network
June 7, 2024
Abstract
A major challenge in transient pressure analysis for shale gas wells is their complex transient flow behavior and fracturing parameters. While numerical simulations offer high accuracy, analytical models are attractive for transient pressure analysis due to their high computational efficiency and broad applicability. However, traditional analytical models are often oversimplified, making it difficult to capture the complex seepage system, and three-dimensional fracture characteristics are seldom considered. To address these limitations, this study presents a comprehensive hybrid model that characterizes the transient flow behavior and analyzes the pressure response of a fractured shale gas well with a three-dimensional discrete fracture. To achieve this, the hydraulic fracture is discretized into several panels, and the transient flow equation is numerically solved using the finite difference method. Based on the Langmuir adsorption isotherm and the pseudo-steady diffusion in matrix and Darcy flow in the network of micro-fractures, a reservoir model is established, and the Laplace transformation is adopted to solve the model analytically. The transient responses are obtained by dynamically coupling the flow in the reservoir and the discrete fracture. The precision of the proposed model is validated using the commercial numerical simulator, Eclipse. A series of transient pressure dynamic curves are drawn to make a precise observation of different flow regimes, and the effects of several parameters on transient pressure response are also examined. The results show that the shale gas well testing interpretation curves comprise nine flow stages. The pressure drop of shale gas reservoirs is lower than that of conventional gas reservoirs due to the replenishment of desorbed gas. The artificial fracture flow capacity, fracture length, and height are the main engineering factors affecting the pressure responses of shale gas wells. Maximizing the degree and scope of reconstruction can enhance the gas well production capacity during fracturing construction. The research results also indicate that our model is a reliable semi-analytical model for well test interpretations in real case studies.
A major challenge in transient pressure analysis for shale gas wells is their complex transient flow behavior and fracturing parameters. While numerical simulations offer high accuracy, analytical models are attractive for transient pressure analysis due to their high computational efficiency and broad applicability. However, traditional analytical models are often oversimplified, making it difficult to capture the complex seepage system, and three-dimensional fracture characteristics are seldom considered. To address these limitations, this study presents a comprehensive hybrid model that characterizes the transient flow behavior and analyzes the pressure response of a fractured shale gas well with a three-dimensional discrete fracture. To achieve this, the hydraulic fracture is discretized into several panels, and the transient flow equation is numerically solved using the finite difference method. Based on the Langmuir adsorption isotherm and the pseudo-steady diffusion in matrix and Darcy flow in the network of micro-fractures, a reservoir model is established, and the Laplace transformation is adopted to solve the model analytically. The transient responses are obtained by dynamically coupling the flow in the reservoir and the discrete fracture. The precision of the proposed model is validated using the commercial numerical simulator, Eclipse. A series of transient pressure dynamic curves are drawn to make a precise observation of different flow regimes, and the effects of several parameters on transient pressure response are also examined. The results show that the shale gas well testing interpretation curves comprise nine flow stages. The pressure drop of shale gas reservoirs is lower than that of conventional gas reservoirs due to the replenishment of desorbed gas. The artificial fracture flow capacity, fracture length, and height are the main engineering factors affecting the pressure responses of shale gas wells. Maximizing the degree and scope of reconstruction can enhance the gas well production capacity during fracturing construction. The research results also indicate that our model is a reliable semi-analytical model for well test interpretations in real case studies.
Record ID
Keywords
hybrid model, pseudo-steady diffusion, shale gas, three-dimensional discrete fracture, transient behavior
Subject
Suggested Citation
Kang L, Wang G, Zhang X, Guo W, Liang B, Jiang P, Liu Y, Gao J, Liu D, Yu R, Sun Y. Dynamic Pressure Analysis of Shale Gas Wells Considering Three-Dimensional Distribution and Properties of the Hydraulic Fracture Network. (2024). LAPSE:2024.0950
Author Affiliations
Kang L: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Wang G: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Zhang X: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Guo W: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China [ORCID]
Liang B: State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China [ORCID]
Jiang P: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Liu Y: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Gao J: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Liu D: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Yu R: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Sun Y: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China [ORCID]
Wang G: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Zhang X: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Guo W: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China [ORCID]
Liang B: State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China [ORCID]
Jiang P: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Liu Y: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Gao J: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Liu D: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Yu R: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
Sun Y: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
12
Issue
2
First Page
286
Year
2024
Publication Date
2024-01-28
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr12020286, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2024.0950
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020286
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
315
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 7, 2024
Verified by curator on
Jun 7, 2024
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2024.0950
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
