LAPSE:2024.0890
Published Article

LAPSE:2024.0890
A New Method for Numerical Simulation of Coalbed Methane Pilot Horizontal Wells—Taking the Bowen Basin C Pilot Area in Australia as an Example
June 7, 2024
Abstract
Coalbed methane (CBM) pilot wells typically exhibit a short production period, necessitating evaluation of their estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) through numerical simulation. Utilizing limited geological data from the pilot areas to finish history matching and subsequent production forecasting presents substantial challenges. This paper introduces a comprehensive numerical simulation workflow for CBM pilot wells, encompassing the following steps. Initially, geological parameters are categorized into two groups based on their statistical distribution trends: trend parameters (i.e., gas content, permeability, Langmuir volume, and Langmuir pressure) and non-trend parameters (i.e., fracture porosity, gas−water relative permeability, and rock compressibility). The probability method is employed to ascertain the probable high and low limits for trend parameter distributions, while empirical or analogous methods are applied to define the boundaries for non-trend parameters. Subsequently, the parameter sensitivity analysis is conducted to understand the influence of varying parameters on cumulative gas and water production. Conclusively, experimental design algorithms generate over 100 simulation cases using the identified sensitive parameters, from which the top ten optimal cases are chosen for EUR prediction. This workflow features two technological innovations: (1) considering the most comprehensive set of reservoir parameters for uncertainty and sensitivity analyses, and (2) considering the matching accuracy of both cumulative production and dynamic production trends when selecting optimal matching cases. This approach was successfully implemented in the C pilot area of the Bowen Basin, Australia. In addition, it offers valuable insights for numerical simulation of unconventional natural gases, such as shale gas.
Coalbed methane (CBM) pilot wells typically exhibit a short production period, necessitating evaluation of their estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) through numerical simulation. Utilizing limited geological data from the pilot areas to finish history matching and subsequent production forecasting presents substantial challenges. This paper introduces a comprehensive numerical simulation workflow for CBM pilot wells, encompassing the following steps. Initially, geological parameters are categorized into two groups based on their statistical distribution trends: trend parameters (i.e., gas content, permeability, Langmuir volume, and Langmuir pressure) and non-trend parameters (i.e., fracture porosity, gas−water relative permeability, and rock compressibility). The probability method is employed to ascertain the probable high and low limits for trend parameter distributions, while empirical or analogous methods are applied to define the boundaries for non-trend parameters. Subsequently, the parameter sensitivity analysis is conducted to understand the influence of varying parameters on cumulative gas and water production. Conclusively, experimental design algorithms generate over 100 simulation cases using the identified sensitive parameters, from which the top ten optimal cases are chosen for EUR prediction. This workflow features two technological innovations: (1) considering the most comprehensive set of reservoir parameters for uncertainty and sensitivity analyses, and (2) considering the matching accuracy of both cumulative production and dynamic production trends when selecting optimal matching cases. This approach was successfully implemented in the C pilot area of the Bowen Basin, Australia. In addition, it offers valuable insights for numerical simulation of unconventional natural gases, such as shale gas.
Record ID
Keywords
CBM pilot well, history matching, sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis
Subject
Suggested Citation
Wang X, Duan L, Zhang S, Tang S, Lv J, Li X. A New Method for Numerical Simulation of Coalbed Methane Pilot Horizontal Wells—Taking the Bowen Basin C Pilot Area in Australia as an Example. (2024). LAPSE:2024.0890
Author Affiliations
Wang X: School of Energy, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Duan L: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China
Zhang S: School of Energy, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China [ORCID]
Tang S: School of Energy, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Lv J: School of Energy, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Li X: School of Energy, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Duan L: PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China
Zhang S: School of Energy, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China [ORCID]
Tang S: School of Energy, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Lv J: School of Energy, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Li X: School of Energy, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
12
Issue
3
First Page
616
Year
2024
Publication Date
2024-03-20
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr12030616, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2024.0890
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12030616
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
287
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 7, 2024
Verified by curator on
Jun 7, 2024
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2024.0890
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.62 seconds) 0.1 + 0.03 + 0.26 + 0.09 + 0 + 0.04 + 0.03 + 0 + 0.03 + 0.03 + 0 + 0
