LAPSE:2023.7551
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.7551
Thermodynamic and Economic Performance Assessment of Double-Effect Absorption Chiller Systems with Series and Parallel Connections
February 24, 2023
Abstract
Absorption cooling technologies converting excess heat and renewable heat resources to cooling energy have shown progress in recent years. In this study, two 400 kW LiBr solution absorption chiller types with series and parallel connected are analyzed over a range of parameter values to better understand their applicability for different uses. Thermodynamic models for the components were constructed and validated. The performance of the chillers related to heat transfer, energy, exergy, and economy performance was comprehensively analyzed. The operating performance was investigated by considering the external variables, including inlet cooling water, chilled water, and inlet steam temperatures and the solution allocation ratio. The results indicate that the parallel connected chiller reaches higher energy and exergy performance than the series-connected chiller, but the heat transfer and economic performance was lower. The coefficient of performance and the exergy efficiency of the parallel chiller were for the reference system 1.30 and 24.42%, respectively. Except for the exergy efficiency, the inlet steam and inlet chilled water temperature had positive impact on the heat transfer, energy, and economic performance, while the inlet cooling water temperature trends the opposite. The sensitivity analysis on solution allocation ratio showed that a higher ratio decreases the heat transfer and economic performance, but considering the energy and exergy performance, a suitable allocation ratio would be 0.54.
Absorption cooling technologies converting excess heat and renewable heat resources to cooling energy have shown progress in recent years. In this study, two 400 kW LiBr solution absorption chiller types with series and parallel connected are analyzed over a range of parameter values to better understand their applicability for different uses. Thermodynamic models for the components were constructed and validated. The performance of the chillers related to heat transfer, energy, exergy, and economy performance was comprehensively analyzed. The operating performance was investigated by considering the external variables, including inlet cooling water, chilled water, and inlet steam temperatures and the solution allocation ratio. The results indicate that the parallel connected chiller reaches higher energy and exergy performance than the series-connected chiller, but the heat transfer and economic performance was lower. The coefficient of performance and the exergy efficiency of the parallel chiller were for the reference system 1.30 and 24.42%, respectively. Except for the exergy efficiency, the inlet steam and inlet chilled water temperature had positive impact on the heat transfer, energy, and economic performance, while the inlet cooling water temperature trends the opposite. The sensitivity analysis on solution allocation ratio showed that a higher ratio decreases the heat transfer and economic performance, but considering the energy and exergy performance, a suitable allocation ratio would be 0.54.
Record ID
Keywords
absorption chiller, external parameters, multi-criteria performance, series/parallel connected, solution allocation ratio
Subject
Suggested Citation
Hu J, Teng K, Qiu Y, Chen Y, Wang J, Lund P. Thermodynamic and Economic Performance Assessment of Double-Effect Absorption Chiller Systems with Series and Parallel Connections. (2023). LAPSE:2023.7551
Author Affiliations
Hu J: PowerChina Huadong Engineering Co., Ltd., No. 201 Gaojiao Road, Hangzhou 311122, China
Teng K: PowerChina Huadong Engineering Co., Ltd., No. 201 Gaojiao Road, Hangzhou 311122, China
Qiu Y: Management School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
Chen Y: Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Solar Energy Science and Technology, School of Energy & Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Wang J: Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Solar Energy Science and Technology, School of Energy & Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Lund P: Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Solar Energy Science and Technology, School of Energy & Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China; School of Science, Aalto University, Aalto, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland [ORCID]
Teng K: PowerChina Huadong Engineering Co., Ltd., No. 201 Gaojiao Road, Hangzhou 311122, China
Qiu Y: Management School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
Chen Y: Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Solar Energy Science and Technology, School of Energy & Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Wang J: Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Solar Energy Science and Technology, School of Energy & Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Lund P: Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Solar Energy Science and Technology, School of Energy & Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China; School of Science, Aalto University, Aalto, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
15
Issue
23
First Page
9105
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-12-01
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en15239105, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.7551
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15239105
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
187
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 24, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 24, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.7551
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
