LAPSE:2023.5752
Published Article
LAPSE:2023.5752
UVA-LED Technology’s Treatment Efficiency and Cost in a Competitive Trial Applied to the Photo-Fenton Treatment of Landfill Leachate
February 23, 2023
Abstract
The objective of this trial was to assess the application of UVA-LED technology as an alternative source of irradiation for photo-Fenton processes, aiming to reduce treatment costs and provide a feasible treatment for landfill leachate. An optimized combination of coagulation with ferric chloride followed by photo-Fenton treatment of landfill leachate was optimized. Three different radiation sources were tested, namely, two conventional high-pressure mercury-vapor immersion lamps (100 W and 450 W) and a custom-designed 8 W 365 nm UVA-LED lamp. The proposed treatment combination resulted in very efficient degradation of landfill leachate (COD removal = 90%). The coagulation pre-treatment removed about 70% of the COD and provided the necessary amount of iron for the subsequent photo-Fenton treatment, and it further favored this process by acidifying the solution to an optimum initial pH of 2.8. The 90% removal of color improved the penetration of radiation into the medium and by extension improved treatment efficiency. The faster the Fenton reactions were, as determined by the stoichiometric optimum set-up reaction condition of [H2O2]0/COD0 = 2.125, the better were the treatment results in terms of COD removal and biodegradability enhancement because the chances to scavenge oxidant agents were limited. The 100 W lamp was the least efficient one in terms of final effluent quality and operational cost figures. UVA-LED technology, assessed as the application of an 8 W 365 nm lamp, provided competitive results in terms of COD removal, biodegradability enhancement, and operational costs (35−55%) when compared to the performance of the 450 W conventional lamp.
Keywords
coagulation pre-treatment, combined treatment, landfill leachate, photo-Fenton, UVA-LED, wastewater treatment cost
Suggested Citation
Tejera J, Gascó A, Hermosilla D, Alonso-Gomez V, Negro C, Blanco Á. UVA-LED Technology’s Treatment Efficiency and Cost in a Competitive Trial Applied to the Photo-Fenton Treatment of Landfill Leachate. (2023). LAPSE:2023.5752
Author Affiliations
Tejera J: Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avenida Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Gascó A: Department of Forest and Environmental Engineering and Management, E.T.S.I. Montes, Forestal y del Medio Natural, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain [ORCID]
Hermosilla D: Department of Forest and Environmental Engineering and Management, E.T.S.I. Montes, Forestal y del Medio Natural, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain; Department of Agricultural and Forest Engineering, Campus Duques de Soria, Universit
Alonso-Gomez V: Department of Applied Physics, Campus Duques de Soria, University of Valladolid, EIFAB, 42005 Soria, Spain [ORCID]
Negro C: Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avenida Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain [ORCID]
Blanco Á: Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avenida Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
9
Issue
6
First Page
1026
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-06-10
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr9061026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.5752
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9061026
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Feb 23, 2023
Main Article
License
CC BY 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
229
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 23, 2023
 
Verified by curator on
Feb 23, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.5752
 
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
(1.03 seconds)