LAPSE:2023.5375
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.5375
Conventional versus Ritual Slaughter−Ethical Aspects and Meat Quality
February 23, 2023
Abstract
Social pressure on increased protection and welfare of animals results mainly from the initiative of people living in the urbanized parts of the world. The respect for the right to freedom of religion, which is indisputably one of the fundamental liberal rights, must be taken into account. The right to freedom to religion also includes the right to follow a religion’s dietary recommendations. The aim of the literature analysis was to systematize the knowledge on the ethical aspects and quality of meat obtained from carcasses of animals subjected to conventional and ritual slaughter. Consistent with the importance of ritual slaughter for humans of two major faiths (Islam and Judaism), it is important that scientists be objective when evaluating these practices from an animal welfare and meat quality point of view. To evaluate the welfare of the slaughtered animal, it is necessary to openly discuss ritual slaughter and the improvement of its methods. The quality of meat and the degree of bleeding of animals do not always correlate with the ritual slaughter method used.
Social pressure on increased protection and welfare of animals results mainly from the initiative of people living in the urbanized parts of the world. The respect for the right to freedom of religion, which is indisputably one of the fundamental liberal rights, must be taken into account. The right to freedom to religion also includes the right to follow a religion’s dietary recommendations. The aim of the literature analysis was to systematize the knowledge on the ethical aspects and quality of meat obtained from carcasses of animals subjected to conventional and ritual slaughter. Consistent with the importance of ritual slaughter for humans of two major faiths (Islam and Judaism), it is important that scientists be objective when evaluating these practices from an animal welfare and meat quality point of view. To evaluate the welfare of the slaughtered animal, it is necessary to openly discuss ritual slaughter and the improvement of its methods. The quality of meat and the degree of bleeding of animals do not always correlate with the ritual slaughter method used.
Record ID
Keywords
conventional slaughter, halal, kosher, meat quality, ritual slaughter
Suggested Citation
Żurek J, Rudy M, Kachel M, Rudy S. Conventional versus Ritual Slaughter−Ethical Aspects and Meat Quality. (2023). LAPSE:2023.5375
Author Affiliations
Żurek J: Department of Agricultural Processing and Commodity Science, Institute of Food and Nutrition Technology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4 St., 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
Rudy M: Department of Agricultural Processing and Commodity Science, Institute of Food and Nutrition Technology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4 St., 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland [ORCID]
Kachel M: Department of Machinery Exploitation and Management of Production Processes, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28 St., 20-612 Lublin, Poland [ORCID]
Rudy S: Department of Thermal Technology and Food Process Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 31 St., 20-612 Lublin, Poland
Rudy M: Department of Agricultural Processing and Commodity Science, Institute of Food and Nutrition Technology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4 St., 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland [ORCID]
Kachel M: Department of Machinery Exploitation and Management of Production Processes, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28 St., 20-612 Lublin, Poland [ORCID]
Rudy S: Department of Thermal Technology and Food Process Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 31 St., 20-612 Lublin, Poland
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
9
Issue
8
First Page
1381
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-08-08
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr9081381, Publication Type: Review
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.5375
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9081381
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
433
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 23, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 23, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.5375
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.08 seconds)
[0.09 s]
