LAPSE:2023.4568
Published Article
LAPSE:2023.4568
Manual Application versus Autonomous Release of Water Repellent Agent to Prevent Reinforcement Corrosion in Cracked Concrete
Kim Van Tittelboom, Bjorn Van Belleghem, Philip Van den Heede, Jolien Van Der Putten, Renaat Callens, Jeroen Van Stappen, Maxim Deprez, Veerle Cnudde, Nele De Belie
February 23, 2023
Abstract
Cracks in reinforced concrete are preferential ingress paths for aggressive substances such as chlorides. As soon as a critical amount of chlorides has reached the steel reinforcement, corrosion will occur. Therefore, crack healing is of utmost importance. However, manual crack repair is very labour intensive. Therefore, the potential of self-healing through the release of a water repellent agent from embedded capsules was compared with the effectiveness of applying this agent on the concrete surface before or after cracking and the effectiveness of injection of the agent into a crack. From the electrochemical corrosion measurements, it was shown that only uncracked samples were able to withstand 135 weekly cycles of exposure to a 33 g/L chloride solution without corrosion initiation of the reinforcement. While samples with manually injected and autonomously healed cracks resisted the exposure conditions for about 50 cycles or more, samples for which the water repellent agent was applied onto the surface after cracking resisted the exposure conditions for 5−42 cycles, while samples for which the agent was applied onto the surface before cracking showed an immediate corrosion initiation similar as was noted for the untreated cracks. From a visualization of the chloride ingress front and determination of the chloride content in the vicinity of the crack, it was noticed that none of the crack treatment techniques performed as well as the uncracked series. Visual inspection of the corroded rebars and determination of the corroded volume of the rebars through computed tomography and macro-cell corrosion current measurements proved again that the uncracked series outperformed the other series. While the corroded volume of the rebars from the uncracked series was almost zero, this value ranged from 15−95 mm3 for the rebars of the other series. However, the latter investigations also showed that release of the agent into the crack, whether this was done in a manual way or autonomously through release from embedded capsules, resulted in a delayed corrosion initiation and lower corrosion propagation rate compared to the application of a water repellent agent onto the surface. This is a beneficial outcome for the further implementation of self-healing approaches, more specifically though the release of encapsulated water repellent agent, in the market.
Keywords
corrosion, cracking, electrochemical corrosion measurements, encapsulation, long term testing, self-healing, tomography, water repellent agent
Subject
Suggested Citation
Van Tittelboom K, Van Belleghem B, Van den Heede P, Van Der Putten J, Callens R, Van Stappen J, Deprez M, Cnudde V, De Belie N. Manual Application versus Autonomous Release of Water Repellent Agent to Prevent Reinforcement Corrosion in Cracked Concrete. (2023). LAPSE:2023.4568
Author Affiliations
Van Tittelboom K: Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory for Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 60, 9052 Ghent, Belgium [ORCID]
Van Belleghem B: SANACON bv, Spin-Off Company Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory for Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Nijverheidsweg 1/A, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
Van den Heede P: Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory for Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 60, 9052 Ghent, Belgium [ORCID]
Van Der Putten J: Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory for Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 60, 9052 Ghent, Belgium [ORCID]
Callens R: Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory for Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 60, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
Van Stappen J: PProGRess-UGCT, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Deprez M: PProGRess-UGCT, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium [ORCID]
Cnudde V: PProGRess-UGCT, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Environmental Hydrogeology, Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8A, 3584 CD Utrecht, [ORCID]
De Belie N: Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory for Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 60, 9052 Ghent, Belgium [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
9
Issue
12
First Page
2101
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-11-23
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr9122101, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.4568
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9122101
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Feb 23, 2023
Main Article
License
CC BY 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
366
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 23, 2023
 
Verified by curator on
Feb 23, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.4568
 
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
(0.09 seconds)

[0.09 s]