LAPSE:2023.3612
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.3612
Technical Performance Comparison between U-Shaped and Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers
February 22, 2023
Abstract
The geothermal industry is fronted by a fundamental decade to grow and become an energy supplier in transitioning to a sustainable energy system. The introduction of Closed-Loop Geothermal energy systems (CLG) can overcome the negative social response and increase the attractiveness of geothermal developments. The present work aims to investigate and compare the performance of CLG systems. For the comparison, the case study of Campi Flegrei was chosen. The maximum depth was fixed at 2000 m, and the two configurations were set up to analyse the performance and evaluate the best operational configuration. Both CLG configurations showed decay in the output temperature of the working fluid during the production time. For a U-shaped design, it is possible to find a working condition that allows constant thermal power over time. The DBHE specific power was always more significant, up to 350 kW/m, compared to the U-shaped, which attained a maximum of 300 W/m (15%). The comparison with Beckers et al. analysis highlights the similarity of our results with their base case. The consideration of the CLG system’s length is related to the heat exchange and investment costs. For longer exchangers, there are higher investments and lower specific power.
The geothermal industry is fronted by a fundamental decade to grow and become an energy supplier in transitioning to a sustainable energy system. The introduction of Closed-Loop Geothermal energy systems (CLG) can overcome the negative social response and increase the attractiveness of geothermal developments. The present work aims to investigate and compare the performance of CLG systems. For the comparison, the case study of Campi Flegrei was chosen. The maximum depth was fixed at 2000 m, and the two configurations were set up to analyse the performance and evaluate the best operational configuration. Both CLG configurations showed decay in the output temperature of the working fluid during the production time. For a U-shaped design, it is possible to find a working condition that allows constant thermal power over time. The DBHE specific power was always more significant, up to 350 kW/m, compared to the U-shaped, which attained a maximum of 300 W/m (15%). The comparison with Beckers et al. analysis highlights the similarity of our results with their base case. The consideration of the CLG system’s length is related to the heat exchange and investment costs. For longer exchangers, there are higher investments and lower specific power.
Record ID
Keywords
closed-loop systems, deep borehole heat exchanger, geothermal energy, U-loop
Subject
Suggested Citation
Alimonti C. Technical Performance Comparison between U-Shaped and Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers. (2023). LAPSE:2023.3612
Author Affiliations
Alimonti C: Department of Chemical Engineering Materials Environment, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
16
Issue
3
First Page
1351
Year
2023
Publication Date
2023-01-27
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en16031351, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.3612
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031351
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
343
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 22, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 22, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.3612
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.08 seconds)
[0.08 s]
