LAPSE:2023.2056
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.2056
A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Mortar Compressive Strength
February 21, 2023
Abstract
Predicting the mechanical properties of cement-based mortars is essential in understanding the life and functioning of structures. Machine learning (ML) algorithms in this regard can be especially useful in prediction scenarios. In this paper, a comprehensive comparison of nine ML algorithms, i.e., linear regression (LR), random forest regression (RFR), support vector regression (SVR), AdaBoost regression (ABR), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), gradient boosting regression (GBR), decision tree regression (DT), hist gradient boosting regression (hGBR) and XGBoost regression (XGB), is carried out. A multi-attribute decision making method called TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) is used to select the best ML metamodel. A large dataset on cement-based mortars consisting of 424 sample points is used. The compressive strength of cement-based mortars is predicted based on six input parameters, i.e., the age of specimen (AS), the cement grade (CG), the metakaolin-to-total-binder ratio (MK/B), the water-to-binder ratio (W/B), the superplasticizer-to-binder ratio (SP) and the binder-to-sand ratio (B/S). XGBoost regression is found to be the best ML metamodel while simple metamodels like linear regression (LR) are found to be insufficient in handling the non-linearity in the process. This mapping of the compressive strength of mortars using ML techniques will be helpful for practitioners and researchers in identifying suitable mortar mixes.
Predicting the mechanical properties of cement-based mortars is essential in understanding the life and functioning of structures. Machine learning (ML) algorithms in this regard can be especially useful in prediction scenarios. In this paper, a comprehensive comparison of nine ML algorithms, i.e., linear regression (LR), random forest regression (RFR), support vector regression (SVR), AdaBoost regression (ABR), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), gradient boosting regression (GBR), decision tree regression (DT), hist gradient boosting regression (hGBR) and XGBoost regression (XGB), is carried out. A multi-attribute decision making method called TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) is used to select the best ML metamodel. A large dataset on cement-based mortars consisting of 424 sample points is used. The compressive strength of cement-based mortars is predicted based on six input parameters, i.e., the age of specimen (AS), the cement grade (CG), the metakaolin-to-total-binder ratio (MK/B), the water-to-binder ratio (W/B), the superplasticizer-to-binder ratio (SP) and the binder-to-sand ratio (B/S). XGBoost regression is found to be the best ML metamodel while simple metamodels like linear regression (LR) are found to be insufficient in handling the non-linearity in the process. This mapping of the compressive strength of mortars using ML techniques will be helpful for practitioners and researchers in identifying suitable mortar mixes.
Record ID
Keywords
compressive strength, Machine Learning, predictive models, regression, TOPSIS
Subject
Suggested Citation
Gayathri R, Rani SU, Čepová L, Rajesh M, Kalita K. A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Mortar Compressive Strength. (2023). LAPSE:2023.2056
Author Affiliations
Gayathri R: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Campus, Chennai 600 127, India
Rani SU: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Campus, Chennai 600 127, India [ORCID]
Čepová L: Department of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic [ORCID]
Rajesh M: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Campus, Chennai 600 127, India [ORCID]
Kalita K: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi 600 062, India [ORCID]
Rani SU: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Campus, Chennai 600 127, India [ORCID]
Čepová L: Department of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic [ORCID]
Rajesh M: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Campus, Chennai 600 127, India [ORCID]
Kalita K: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi 600 062, India [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
10
Issue
7
First Page
1387
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-07-15
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr10071387, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.2056
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071387
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
255
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 21, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 21, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.2056
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(2.86 seconds) 0.08 + 0.23 + 1.36 + 0.54 + 0.02 + 0.21 + 0.13 + 0 + 0.13 + 0.17 + 0 + 0
