LAPSE:2023.1943v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.1943v1
Improvement of Ecological Risk Considering Heavy Metal in Soil and Groundwater Surrounding Electroplating Factories
February 21, 2023
Abstract
Heavy metals in groundwater and soil are toxic to humans. An accurate risk assessment of heavy metal contamination can aid in environmental security decision making. In this study, the improved ecological risk index (RI) is used to comprehensively investigate the influence of heavy metals in soil and groundwater within electroplating factories and their surrounding regions. In the non-overlapping area, the RI of soil and groundwater is computed individually, and in the overlapping area, the greater RI of soil and groundwater is employed. Two typical electroplating factories are used to examine the heavy metal distribution pattern. The heavy metal concentrations are compared between Factory A, which is in operation, and Factory B, which is no longer in operation, in order to analyze the heavy metal concentrations and associated ecological risks. Heavy metals continue to spread horizontally and vertically after Factory B was closed. Heavy metal concentrations in groundwater surrounding Factory B are substantially greater, and the maximum concentration exists deeper than in Factory A. Because Cr, Cu, and Hg in soil contribute significantly to the RI, the primary high RI region is observed at Factory A and the region to the southwest. The RI of Factory B demonstrates a broad, moderate risk zone in the west and southwest.
Heavy metals in groundwater and soil are toxic to humans. An accurate risk assessment of heavy metal contamination can aid in environmental security decision making. In this study, the improved ecological risk index (RI) is used to comprehensively investigate the influence of heavy metals in soil and groundwater within electroplating factories and their surrounding regions. In the non-overlapping area, the RI of soil and groundwater is computed individually, and in the overlapping area, the greater RI of soil and groundwater is employed. Two typical electroplating factories are used to examine the heavy metal distribution pattern. The heavy metal concentrations are compared between Factory A, which is in operation, and Factory B, which is no longer in operation, in order to analyze the heavy metal concentrations and associated ecological risks. Heavy metals continue to spread horizontally and vertically after Factory B was closed. Heavy metal concentrations in groundwater surrounding Factory B are substantially greater, and the maximum concentration exists deeper than in Factory A. Because Cr, Cu, and Hg in soil contribute significantly to the RI, the primary high RI region is observed at Factory A and the region to the southwest. The RI of Factory B demonstrates a broad, moderate risk zone in the west and southwest.
Record ID
Keywords
electroplating factory, environmental evaluation, groundwater, heavy metal, multivariable analysis, soil
Subject
Suggested Citation
Fang H, Wang X, Xia D, Zhu J, Yu W, Su Y, Zeng J, Zhang Y, Lin X, Lei Y, Qiu J. Improvement of Ecological Risk Considering Heavy Metal in Soil and Groundwater Surrounding Electroplating Factories. (2023). LAPSE:2023.1943v1
Author Affiliations
Fang H: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Wang X: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Xia D: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Zhu J: Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA [ORCID]
Yu W: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Su Y: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Zeng J: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Zhang Y: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Lin X: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Lei Y: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Qiu J: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Wang X: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Xia D: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Zhu J: Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA [ORCID]
Yu W: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Su Y: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Zeng J: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Zhang Y: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Lin X: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Lei Y: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Qiu J: South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Guangzhou 510655, China
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
10
Issue
7
First Page
1267
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-06-27
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr10071267, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.1943v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071267
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
371
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 21, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 21, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.1943v1
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.08 seconds)
[0.08 s]
