LAPSE:2023.17165
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.17165
Social and Economic Value in Emerging Decentralized Energy Business Models: A Critical Review
March 6, 2023
Abstract
In recent years, numerous studies have explored the opportunities and challenges for emerging decentralized energy systems and business models. However, few studies have focussed specifically on the economic and social value associated with three emerging models: peer-to-peer energy trading (P2P), community self-consumption (CSC) and transactive energy (TE). This article presents the findings of a systematic literature review to address this gap. The paper makes two main contributions to the literature. Firstly, it offers a synthesis of research on the social and economic value of P2P, CSC and TE systems, concluding that there is evidence for a variety of sources of social value (including energy independence, local benefits, social relationships, environmental responsibility and participation and purpose) and economic value (including via self-consumption of renewable electricity, reduced electricity import costs, and improved electricity export prices). Secondly, it identifies factors and conditions necessary for the success of these models, which include willingness to participate, participant engagement with technology, and project engagement of households and communities, among other factors. Finally, it discusses conflicts and trade-offs in the value propositions of the models, how the three models differ from one another in terms of the value they aim to deliver and some of the open challenges that require further attention by researchers and practitioners.
In recent years, numerous studies have explored the opportunities and challenges for emerging decentralized energy systems and business models. However, few studies have focussed specifically on the economic and social value associated with three emerging models: peer-to-peer energy trading (P2P), community self-consumption (CSC) and transactive energy (TE). This article presents the findings of a systematic literature review to address this gap. The paper makes two main contributions to the literature. Firstly, it offers a synthesis of research on the social and economic value of P2P, CSC and TE systems, concluding that there is evidence for a variety of sources of social value (including energy independence, local benefits, social relationships, environmental responsibility and participation and purpose) and economic value (including via self-consumption of renewable electricity, reduced electricity import costs, and improved electricity export prices). Secondly, it identifies factors and conditions necessary for the success of these models, which include willingness to participate, participant engagement with technology, and project engagement of households and communities, among other factors. Finally, it discusses conflicts and trade-offs in the value propositions of the models, how the three models differ from one another in terms of the value they aim to deliver and some of the open challenges that require further attention by researchers and practitioners.
Record ID
Keywords
community self-consumption, economic value, energy business models, peer-to-peer electricity trading, social value, transactive energy
Subject
Suggested Citation
Adams S, Brown D, Cárdenas Álvarez JP, Chitchyan R, Fell MJ, Hahnel UJJ, Hojckova K, Johnson C, Klein L, Montakhabi M, Say K, Singh A, Watson N. Social and Economic Value in Emerging Decentralized Energy Business Models: A Critical Review. (2023). LAPSE:2023.17165
Author Affiliations
Adams S: School of Humanities and Languages, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia [ORCID]
Brown D: Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK
Cárdenas Álvarez JP: EnergEIA, Universidad EIA, Envigado 055428, Colombia [ORCID]
Chitchyan R: Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK [ORCID]
Fell MJ: Energy Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Hahnel UJJ: Department of Psychology and Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland [ORCID]
Hojckova K: Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Göteborg, Sweden
Johnson C: Energy Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Klein L: Sustainable Energy Systems Doctoral Programme, MIT Portugal Initiative, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal [ORCID]
Montakhabi M: imec-SMIT, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Ixelles, Belgium [ORCID]
Say K: Energy Transition Hub, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia [ORCID]
Singh A: Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands [ORCID]
Watson N: Energy Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Brown D: Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK
Cárdenas Álvarez JP: EnergEIA, Universidad EIA, Envigado 055428, Colombia [ORCID]
Chitchyan R: Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK [ORCID]
Fell MJ: Energy Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Hahnel UJJ: Department of Psychology and Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland [ORCID]
Hojckova K: Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Göteborg, Sweden
Johnson C: Energy Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Klein L: Sustainable Energy Systems Doctoral Programme, MIT Portugal Initiative, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal [ORCID]
Montakhabi M: imec-SMIT, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Ixelles, Belgium [ORCID]
Say K: Energy Transition Hub, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia [ORCID]
Singh A: Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands [ORCID]
Watson N: Energy Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
14
Issue
23
First Page
7864
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-11-24
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en14237864, Publication Type: Review
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.17165
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237864
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
182
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Mar 6, 2023
Verified by curator on
Mar 6, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.17165
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
