LAPSE:2023.0088
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.0088
Influence of Tip Clearance on Cavitation Characteristics of an Inducer of Turbopump: CFD Study
February 17, 2023
Abstract
The tip clearance, a compact gap between the inducer blade tip and casing wall, is critical to both the liquid leakage and cavitation-induced forces of a turbopump. In this study, we numerically investigate the effect of tip clearance on the cavitation characteristics of an inducer. Six different tip clearances, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2 mm, namely Models A−F, were designed to evaluate the cavitation performance, cavity structure, blade loading, radial force, etc. Model D (1.0 mm) had the relatively highest head coefficient and smallest cavity area on each blade as compared to all other models. The pressure coefficient distribution and blade loading further confirmed that Model D can maintain a higher pressure head and better suppress the cavitation onset than the other models. The radial force signals in the time and frequency domains show that Model D has an intermediate force magnitude with slightly higher noises at the rotating frequency and its harmonic frequencies. Model D also has a relatively smaller vortex region and smaller vortex strength (λ2 criterion). In short, all results show that Model D is the best alternative to balance the complex interactions of the bulk flow and tip leakage flow, compromising the hydraulic head and rotating cavitation.
The tip clearance, a compact gap between the inducer blade tip and casing wall, is critical to both the liquid leakage and cavitation-induced forces of a turbopump. In this study, we numerically investigate the effect of tip clearance on the cavitation characteristics of an inducer. Six different tip clearances, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2 mm, namely Models A−F, were designed to evaluate the cavitation performance, cavity structure, blade loading, radial force, etc. Model D (1.0 mm) had the relatively highest head coefficient and smallest cavity area on each blade as compared to all other models. The pressure coefficient distribution and blade loading further confirmed that Model D can maintain a higher pressure head and better suppress the cavitation onset than the other models. The radial force signals in the time and frequency domains show that Model D has an intermediate force magnitude with slightly higher noises at the rotating frequency and its harmonic frequencies. Model D also has a relatively smaller vortex region and smaller vortex strength (λ2 criterion). In short, all results show that Model D is the best alternative to balance the complex interactions of the bulk flow and tip leakage flow, compromising the hydraulic head and rotating cavitation.
Record ID
Keywords
blade loading, inducer, radial force, rotating cavitation, tip clearance, tip leakage
Subject
Suggested Citation
Han H, Xiang L, Xu K, Geng D, Ren Z, Wu G, Liu S, Zuo Z. Influence of Tip Clearance on Cavitation Characteristics of an Inducer of Turbopump: CFD Study. (2023). LAPSE:2023.0088
Author Affiliations
Han H: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China [ORCID]
Xiang L: Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute, Xi’an 710100, China
Xu K: Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute, Xi’an 710100, China
Geng D: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Ren Z: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China [ORCID]
Wu G: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Liu S: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Zuo Z: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China [ORCID]
Xiang L: Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute, Xi’an 710100, China
Xu K: Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute, Xi’an 710100, China
Geng D: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Ren Z: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China [ORCID]
Wu G: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Liu S: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Zuo Z: State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
11
Issue
1
First Page
55
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-12-26
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr11010055, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.0088
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010055
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
236
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 17, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 17, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.0088
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
