LAPSE:2018.1013v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2018.1013v1
Effect of Borehole Material on Analytical Solutions of the Heat Transfer Model of Ground Heat Exchangers Considering Groundwater Flow
November 27, 2018
Abstract
Groundwater flow is one of the most important factors for the design of a ground heat exchanger (GHEX) since the thermal environment of the ground around the buried GHEX is significantly affected by heat convection due to the groundwater flow. Several preceding studies have been conducted to develop analytical solutions to the heat transfer model of GHEX with consideration of groundwater flow. One of these solutions is the combined heat transfer model of conduction and convection. However, the developed combined analytical models are inapplicable to all of the configurations of ordinary GHEXs because these solutions assume that the inner part of the borehole is thermally inert or consists of the same material as that of the surrounding ground. In this paper, the applicability of the combined solid cylindrical heat source model, which is the most suitable to energy piles until now, was evaluated by performing a series of numerical analyses. In the numerical analysis, the inner part of the borehole was modeled as two different materials (i.e., permeable ground formation and impermeable fill such as concrete) to evaluate applicability of the analytical solution along with different diameter-length (D/L) ratios of borehole. In a small value of the D/L ratio, the analytical solution to the combined heat transfer model is in good agreement with the result of numerical analysis. On the other hand, when increasing the D/L ratio, the analytical solution significantly overestimates the effect of groundwater flow on the heat transfer of GHEXs because the analytical solution disregards the existence of the impermeable region in the borehole. Consequently, such tendency is more critical in the GHEX with a large D/L ratio such as large-diameter energy piles.
Groundwater flow is one of the most important factors for the design of a ground heat exchanger (GHEX) since the thermal environment of the ground around the buried GHEX is significantly affected by heat convection due to the groundwater flow. Several preceding studies have been conducted to develop analytical solutions to the heat transfer model of GHEX with consideration of groundwater flow. One of these solutions is the combined heat transfer model of conduction and convection. However, the developed combined analytical models are inapplicable to all of the configurations of ordinary GHEXs because these solutions assume that the inner part of the borehole is thermally inert or consists of the same material as that of the surrounding ground. In this paper, the applicability of the combined solid cylindrical heat source model, which is the most suitable to energy piles until now, was evaluated by performing a series of numerical analyses. In the numerical analysis, the inner part of the borehole was modeled as two different materials (i.e., permeable ground formation and impermeable fill such as concrete) to evaluate applicability of the analytical solution along with different diameter-length (D/L) ratios of borehole. In a small value of the D/L ratio, the analytical solution to the combined heat transfer model is in good agreement with the result of numerical analysis. On the other hand, when increasing the D/L ratio, the analytical solution significantly overestimates the effect of groundwater flow on the heat transfer of GHEXs because the analytical solution disregards the existence of the impermeable region in the borehole. Consequently, such tendency is more critical in the GHEX with a large D/L ratio such as large-diameter energy piles.
Record ID
Keywords
analytical solution, combined heat transfer model, energy pile, ground heat exchanger (GHEX), groundwater flow, numerical analysis
Subject
Suggested Citation
Park S, Lee S, Lee H, Pham K, Choi H. Effect of Borehole Material on Analytical Solutions of the Heat Transfer Model of Ground Heat Exchangers Considering Groundwater Flow. (2018). LAPSE:2018.1013v1
Author Affiliations
Park S: School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea [ORCID]
Lee S: School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea [ORCID]
Lee H: School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea [ORCID]
Pham K: School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea [ORCID]
Choi H: School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Lee S: School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea [ORCID]
Lee H: School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea [ORCID]
Pham K: School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea [ORCID]
Choi H: School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
9
Issue
5
Article Number
E318
Year
2016
Publication Date
2016-04-25
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en9050318, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2018.1013v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en9050318
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
843
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Nov 27, 2018
Verified by curator on
Nov 27, 2018
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2018.1013v1
Record Owner
Calvin Tsay
Links to Related Works
