LAPSE:2025.0474v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0474v1
Optimization of prospective circular economy in sewage sludge to biofuel production pathways via hydrothermal liquefaction using P-graph
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) has proven to be an appropriate technology for converting sewage sludge into a valuable resource for renewable energy generation. This study focuses on a prospective analysis of various technological scenarios for sewage sludge-to-fuel pathways via HTL, co-located with a wastewater treatment plant, in support of a circular economy perspective. Four technological foreground scenarios and three prospective background scenarios aligned with the Paris agreements climate targets REMIND-SSP2-Base (projecting a 3.5°C temperature rise by the end of the century), PKBudg1150 (aiming to limit the rise to below 2°C), and PKBudg500 (targeting a cap below 1.5°C) are analyzed for sewage sludge-to-fuel conversion in 2030, 2040, and 2050. The superstructure problem of the possible combinations of the developed scenarios is solved using the P-graph studio which is based on the branch and bound approach. The goal of this study is to maximize the objective function (OF) by accounting the credits from avoided GHG emissions, the market value of recovered products, while subtracting operational costs and GHG emission penalties incurred during the biocrude production and upgrading processes. The optimal solution shows a potential OF equal to 858 /ton of sewage sludge for Pkbudg500 under technological foreground scenario 2 by 2040. The P-graph approach demonstrates that HTL treatment of sewage sludge provides an alternative production pathway within the circular economy concept, capable of identifying optimal and near-optimal solutions for addressing trade-offs between future socio-economic policies and practical implementation for 2030, 2040, and 2050, which are often difficult to monetize.
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) has proven to be an appropriate technology for converting sewage sludge into a valuable resource for renewable energy generation. This study focuses on a prospective analysis of various technological scenarios for sewage sludge-to-fuel pathways via HTL, co-located with a wastewater treatment plant, in support of a circular economy perspective. Four technological foreground scenarios and three prospective background scenarios aligned with the Paris agreements climate targets REMIND-SSP2-Base (projecting a 3.5°C temperature rise by the end of the century), PKBudg1150 (aiming to limit the rise to below 2°C), and PKBudg500 (targeting a cap below 1.5°C) are analyzed for sewage sludge-to-fuel conversion in 2030, 2040, and 2050. The superstructure problem of the possible combinations of the developed scenarios is solved using the P-graph studio which is based on the branch and bound approach. The goal of this study is to maximize the objective function (OF) by accounting the credits from avoided GHG emissions, the market value of recovered products, while subtracting operational costs and GHG emission penalties incurred during the biocrude production and upgrading processes. The optimal solution shows a potential OF equal to 858 /ton of sewage sludge for Pkbudg500 under technological foreground scenario 2 by 2040. The P-graph approach demonstrates that HTL treatment of sewage sludge provides an alternative production pathway within the circular economy concept, capable of identifying optimal and near-optimal solutions for addressing trade-offs between future socio-economic policies and practical implementation for 2030, 2040, and 2050, which are often difficult to monetize.
Record ID
Keywords
hydrothermal liquefaction, integrated assessment models, Prospective circular economy, sewage sludge, shared socio-economic pathways
Subject
Suggested Citation
Abbas S, Karka P, Papadokonstantakis S. Optimization of prospective circular economy in sewage sludge to biofuel production pathways via hydrothermal liquefaction using P-graph. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2000-2006 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.189301
Author Affiliations
Abbas S: TU Wien, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Vienna, Austria
Karka P: University of Groningen, Engineering and Technology Institute Groningen (ENTEG), Faculty of Science and Engineering,
Papadokonstantakis S: TU Wien, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Vienna, Austria
Karka P: University of Groningen, Engineering and Technology Institute Groningen (ENTEG), Faculty of Science and Engineering,
Papadokonstantakis S: TU Wien, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Vienna, Austria
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2000
Last Page
2006
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2000-2006-1337-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0474v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.189301
Article DOI
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
766
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0474v1
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- E. M. Lozano, S. Løkke, L. A. Rosendahl, and T. H. Pedersen, "Production of marine biofuels from hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge. Preliminary techno-economic analysis and life-cycle GHG emissions assessment of Dutch case study," Energy Conversion and Management: X, vol. 14, no. October 2021, 2022, https:// https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100178
- K. Kohansal et al., "Automotive sustainable diesel blendstock production through biocrude obtained from hydrothermal liquefaction of municipal solid waste," Fuel, vol. 350, no. June, pp. 1-13, 2023, https:// https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128770
- L. J. Snowden-Swan et al., "Conceptual Biorefinery Design and Research Targeted for 2022: Hydrothermal Liquefaction Processing of Wet Waste to Fuels," Pnnl-27186, vol. 27186, pp. 1-40, 2017 https://doi.org/10.2172/1415710
- N. Thonemann, A. Schulte, and D. Maga, "How to conduct prospective life cycle assessment for emerging technologies? A systematic review and methodological guidance," Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1-23, 2020, https:// https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031192
- L. Baumstark et al., "REMIND2.1: transformation and innovation dynamics of the energy-economic system within climate and sustainability limits," Geosci Model Dev, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 6571-6603, 2021, https:// https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6571-2021
- B. C. O'Neill et al., "A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways," Clim Change, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 387-400, 2014 https:// https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
- O. Fricko et al., "The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century," Global Environmental Change, vol. 42, pp. 251-267, 2017, https:// https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004
- S. Abbas, "Background Scenario Explanation," Mar. 2024.
- R. Sacchi, "PRospective EnvironMental Impact AsSEssment," 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/polca/premise
- R. Sacchi, A. Dirnaichner, and C. Mutel, "Release 1.7.2 Romain Sacchi, Alois Dirnaichner, Chris Mutel," 2023
- R. R. Tan, M. F. D. Benjamin, C. D. Cayamanda, K. B. Aviso, and L. F. Razon, "P-Graph Approach to Optimizing Crisis Operations in an Industrial Complex," Ind Eng Chem Res, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 3467-3477, 2016, https:// https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03205
- Y. Van Fan, J. J. Klemeš, T. G. Walmsley, and B. Bertók, "Implementing Circular Economy in municipal solid waste treatment system using P-graph," Science of the Total Environment, vol. 701, 2020, https:// https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134652
- R. R. Tan, C. D. Cayamanda, and K. B. Aviso, "P-graph approach to optimal operational adjustment in polygeneration plants under conditions of process inoperability," Appl Energy, vol. 135, pp. 402-406, 2014, https:// https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.089
- P. Karka, I. Johannsen, and S. Papadokonstantakis, "Hydrothermal liquefaction integrated with wastewater treatment plants - life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis of process system options," Sustain Energy Fuels, vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 3438-3451, 2024, https:// https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SE01211E
- S. Abbas, "safdarabbas123/Availability-of-data-for- prospective-circular-economy: Initial release," Dec. 2024, Zenodo. https://
- F. Friedler, Á. Orosz, and J. P. Losada, P-graphs for process systems engineering. Springer, 2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92216-0
- S. Abbas, "Future price of biomass, Electricity," Apr. 2024. https://
- Tews, I., Zhu, Y., Drennan, C. V., Elliott, D., Snowden-Swan, L. J., Onarheim, K., Solantausta, Y., & Beckman, D. (2014). Biomass direct liquefaction options: technoeconomic and life cycle assessment. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, July, 62. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1184983 https://doi.org/10.2172/1184983

