Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0437v2
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0437v2
Hybrid Models Identification and Training through Evolutionary Algorithms
Ulderico Di Caprio, M. Enis Leblebici
July 2, 2025. Originally submitted on June 27, 2025
Abstract
Hybrid modelling is widely employed in chemical engineering to generate highly accurate predictions. Such an approach merges first-principle modelling with machine learning techniques to identify and model the epistemic uncertainty from experimental data. Despite its advantages, this still requires cross-domain competencies that are difficult to find in the chemical industry and high human involvement. The possibility of automating the identification and training model would be significantly beneficial for the widespread adoption of hybrid modelling methodology within the chemical industry. This work presents a novel algorithm for the automatic identification of hybrid models (HMs) starting from the first-principle representation of the system, described by differential equation sets. The methodology formulates the problem as mixed-integer programming, identifying the equation running under uncertainty, identifying the machine learning model hyperparameters, and training the latter. The Differential Evolution algorithm drives the identification and training tasks. The methodology is validated in three cases, namely a dynamic reaction system, a dynamic bioreactor and a Lotka-Volterra oscillator deviated with polynomial or MRF equation on different levels, generating 14 validation cases. On all of them, the model correctly identifies the position of the uncertainty and the functional form to approximate it. The methodology returns automatically trained HMs with a mean absolute percentage error in the range of 10%, which is in line with the experimental error of the data. The methodology presented in this work presents a step toward the automatic generation of HMs for dynamic systems and the widespread of this technology in the chemical industry.
Keywords
automatic identification, differential evolution, epistemic uncertainty, hybrid modelling, Machine Learning
Suggested Citation
Di Caprio U, Leblebici ME. Hybrid Models Identification and Training through Evolutionary Algorithms. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1775-1780 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.192790
Author Affiliations
Di Caprio U: Center for Industrial Process Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Agoralaan Building B, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Leblebici ME: Center for Industrial Process Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Agoralaan Building B, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1775
Last Page
1780
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Surname corrected in footer
Other Meta
PII: 1775-1780-1394-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0437v2
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.192790
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jul 2, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
989
Version History
[v2] (Surname corrected in footer)
Jul 2, 2025
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jul 2, 2025
This Version Number
v2
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0437v2
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Schweidtmann AM, Zhang D, Von Stosch M. A review and perspective on hybrid modeling methodologies. Digit. Chem. Eng. 10:100136 (2023). doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2023.100136 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2023.100136
  2. Wilson ZT, Sahinidis NV. The ALAMO approach to machine learning. Comput. Chem. Eng. 106:785-95 (2017).doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.02.010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.02.010
  3. Narayanan H, Bournazou MNC, Gosálbez GG, Butté A. Functional-Hybrid modeling through automated adaptive symbolic regression for interpretable mathematical expressions. Chem Eng J. 430:133032 (2021). doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133032 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133032
  4. Willis MJ, Von Stosch M. Simultaneous parameter identification and discrimination of the nonparametric structure of hybrid semi-parametric models. Comput. Chem. Eng. 104:366-76 (2017). doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.05.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.05.005
  5. Angelis D., Sofos F., Karakasidis T.E. Artificial Intelligence in Physical Sciences: Symbolic Regression Trends and Perspectives. Arch Computat Methods Eng 30, 3845-3865 (2023). doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09922-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09922-z
  6. Brunton SL., Proctor JL., Kutz JN. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113:3932-3937 (2016). doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517384113 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517384113
  7. Storn R, Price K. Differential Evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Glob. Optim. 11(4):341-59 (1997). doi.org/10.1023/a:1008202821328 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328
  8. Lampinen J. A constraint handling approach for the differential evolution algorithm. Vol. 2, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600). 2003. doi.org/10.1109/cec.2002.1004459 https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2002.1004459