LAPSE:2024.1723v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2024.1723v1
Spent Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Using Flotation Technology: Effect of Material Heterogeneity on Separation Performance
August 23, 2024
Abstract
In this study, two types of recycling scenarios are assessed for spent battery materials using froth flotation. The first is for a single cathode chemistry and would be considered as the most likely scenario for a large battery manufacturer, who takes back their own batteries for reprocessing. The second scenario is for mixed cathode chemistry, and this would be the most likely scenario for regional reprocessing. The mixed spent battery materials assessed in this work were sourced from such an industrial recycling operation in Australia. Good results were obtained for both recycling scenarios. The anode recovery and anode grade in the final concentrate for both materials evaluated were for the single spent battery material 80.1% and 90.3%, respectively, and for the mixed spent battery material, 77.4% and 82.0%, respectively. For the final tailings, the cathode grades for both materials tested were 93.9% and 87.1%, respectively, with the lower grade for the mixed spent battery attributed to the high content of impurities in the original material. These results highlight the importance of the preprocessing ahead of the flotation process. The results confirm froth flotation as a feasible technique that can be used to achieve the bulk of the separation.
In this study, two types of recycling scenarios are assessed for spent battery materials using froth flotation. The first is for a single cathode chemistry and would be considered as the most likely scenario for a large battery manufacturer, who takes back their own batteries for reprocessing. The second scenario is for mixed cathode chemistry, and this would be the most likely scenario for regional reprocessing. The mixed spent battery materials assessed in this work were sourced from such an industrial recycling operation in Australia. Good results were obtained for both recycling scenarios. The anode recovery and anode grade in the final concentrate for both materials evaluated were for the single spent battery material 80.1% and 90.3%, respectively, and for the mixed spent battery material, 77.4% and 82.0%, respectively. For the final tailings, the cathode grades for both materials tested were 93.9% and 87.1%, respectively, with the lower grade for the mixed spent battery attributed to the high content of impurities in the original material. These results highlight the importance of the preprocessing ahead of the flotation process. The results confirm froth flotation as a feasible technique that can be used to achieve the bulk of the separation.
Record ID
Keywords
cathode chemistry, circular economy, E-waste, entrainment, froth flotation
Subject
Suggested Citation
Verdugo L, Zhang L, Etschmann B, Brugger J, Bruckard W, Menacho J, Molina L, Hoadley A. Spent Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Using Flotation Technology: Effect of Material Heterogeneity on Separation Performance. (2024). LAPSE:2024.1723v1
Author Affiliations
Verdugo L: Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Monash University, 18 Alliance Lane, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia; School of Earth Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
Zhang L: Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Monash University, 18 Alliance Lane, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia [ORCID]
Etschmann B: School of Earth Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
Brugger J: School of Earth Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
Bruckard W: CSIRO Mineral Resources, Melbourne, VIC 3169, Australia
Menacho J: De Re Metallica Ingeniería SpA, Avda. Del Valle 576, Huechuraba 8581151, Santiago, Chile
Molina L: Materials Chemistry Department, University of Santiago, Estación Central 9170022, Santiago, Chile [ORCID]
Hoadley A: Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Monash University, 18 Alliance Lane, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia [ORCID]
Zhang L: Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Monash University, 18 Alliance Lane, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia [ORCID]
Etschmann B: School of Earth Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
Brugger J: School of Earth Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
Bruckard W: CSIRO Mineral Resources, Melbourne, VIC 3169, Australia
Menacho J: De Re Metallica Ingeniería SpA, Avda. Del Valle 576, Huechuraba 8581151, Santiago, Chile
Molina L: Materials Chemistry Department, University of Santiago, Estación Central 9170022, Santiago, Chile [ORCID]
Hoadley A: Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Monash University, 18 Alliance Lane, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
12
Issue
7
First Page
1363
Year
2024
Publication Date
2024-06-29
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr12071363, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2024.1723v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071363
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
446
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Aug 23, 2024
Verified by curator on
Aug 23, 2024
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2024.1723v1
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
