LAPSE:2023.33802
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.33802
Comparative TCO Analysis of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Buses for Public Transport System in Small to Midsize Cities
April 24, 2023
Abstract
This paper shows the results of an in-depth techno-economic analysis of the public transport sector in a small to midsize city and its surrounding area. Public battery-electric and hydrogen fuel cell buses are comparatively evaluated by means of a total cost of ownership (TCO) model building on historical data and a projection of market prices. Additionally, a structural analysis of the public transport system of a specific city is performed, assessing best fitting bus lines for the use of electric or hydrogen busses, which is supported by a brief acceptance evaluation of the local citizens. The TCO results for electric buses show a strong cost decrease until the year 2030, reaching 23.5% lower TCOs compared to the conventional diesel bus. The optimal electric bus charging system will be the opportunity (pantograph) charging infrastructure. However, the opportunity charging method is applicable under the assumption that several buses share the same station and there is a “hotspot” where as many as possible bus lines converge. In the case of electric buses for the year 2020, the parameter which influenced the most on the TCO was the battery cost, opposite to the year 2030 in where the bus body cost and fuel cost parameters are the ones that dominate the TCO, due to the learning rate of the batteries. For H2 buses, finding a hotspot is not crucial because they have a similar range to the diesel ones as well as a similar refueling time. H2 buses until 2030 still have 15.4% higher TCO than the diesel bus system. Considering the benefits of a hypothetical scaling-up effect of hydrogen infrastructures in the region, the hydrogen cost could drop to 5 €/kg. In this case, the overall TCO of the hydrogen solution would drop to a slightly lower TCO than the diesel solution in 2030. Therefore, hydrogen buses can be competitive in small to midsize cities, even with limited routes. For hydrogen buses, the bus body and fuel cost make up a large part of the TCO. Reducing the fuel cost will be an important aspect to reduce the total TCO of the hydrogen bus.
This paper shows the results of an in-depth techno-economic analysis of the public transport sector in a small to midsize city and its surrounding area. Public battery-electric and hydrogen fuel cell buses are comparatively evaluated by means of a total cost of ownership (TCO) model building on historical data and a projection of market prices. Additionally, a structural analysis of the public transport system of a specific city is performed, assessing best fitting bus lines for the use of electric or hydrogen busses, which is supported by a brief acceptance evaluation of the local citizens. The TCO results for electric buses show a strong cost decrease until the year 2030, reaching 23.5% lower TCOs compared to the conventional diesel bus. The optimal electric bus charging system will be the opportunity (pantograph) charging infrastructure. However, the opportunity charging method is applicable under the assumption that several buses share the same station and there is a “hotspot” where as many as possible bus lines converge. In the case of electric buses for the year 2020, the parameter which influenced the most on the TCO was the battery cost, opposite to the year 2030 in where the bus body cost and fuel cost parameters are the ones that dominate the TCO, due to the learning rate of the batteries. For H2 buses, finding a hotspot is not crucial because they have a similar range to the diesel ones as well as a similar refueling time. H2 buses until 2030 still have 15.4% higher TCO than the diesel bus system. Considering the benefits of a hypothetical scaling-up effect of hydrogen infrastructures in the region, the hydrogen cost could drop to 5 €/kg. In this case, the overall TCO of the hydrogen solution would drop to a slightly lower TCO than the diesel solution in 2030. Therefore, hydrogen buses can be competitive in small to midsize cities, even with limited routes. For hydrogen buses, the bus body and fuel cost make up a large part of the TCO. Reducing the fuel cost will be an important aspect to reduce the total TCO of the hydrogen bus.
Record ID
Keywords
city bus, electric bus, hydrogen bus, public transport, total cost of ownership (TCO), zero-emission buses (ZEB)
Subject
Suggested Citation
Kim H, Hartmann N, Zeller M, Luise R, Soylu T. Comparative TCO Analysis of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Buses for Public Transport System in Small to Midsize Cities. (2023). LAPSE:2023.33802
Author Affiliations
Kim H: Institute of Energy Systems Technology (INES), Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Badstrasse 24, 77652 Offenburg, Germany
Hartmann N: Institute of Energy Systems Technology (INES), Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Badstrasse 24, 77652 Offenburg, Germany
Zeller M: European Institute for Energy Research (EIFERI), Emmy-Noether-Str. 11, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Luise R: European Institute for Energy Research (EIFERI), Emmy-Noether-Str. 11, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Soylu T: Regionalverband Mittlerer Oberrhein, Haus der Region, Baumeisterstraße 2, 76137 Karlsruhe, Germany [ORCID]
Hartmann N: Institute of Energy Systems Technology (INES), Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Badstrasse 24, 77652 Offenburg, Germany
Zeller M: European Institute for Energy Research (EIFERI), Emmy-Noether-Str. 11, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Luise R: European Institute for Energy Research (EIFERI), Emmy-Noether-Str. 11, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Soylu T: Regionalverband Mittlerer Oberrhein, Haus der Region, Baumeisterstraße 2, 76137 Karlsruhe, Germany [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
14
Issue
14
First Page
4384
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-07-20
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en14144384, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.33802
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144384
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
202
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 24, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 24, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.33802
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.21 seconds)
