LAPSE:2023.32423
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.32423
Comparative Study on Relative Fossil Energy Carrying Capacity in China and the United States
April 20, 2023
Abstract
Based on resource carrying capacity, this study used the revised theory of relative resource carrying capacity (RRCC) and introduced an innovative concept of relative fossil energy carrying capacity (RFECC), which evaluates the degree of fossil energy sustainability based on the relationship between economy, population, and environment. This study took China and the United States as the study objects, took the whole country as the reference area, and calculated the RFECC of population, economic, and environmental resources from 2000 to 2018. Therefore, based on the comparative analysis, the following conclusions were drawn: (i) there is a big difference in the RFECC between China and the United States, which is manifested in the inverted U-shaped trend in China and the U-shaped trend in the United States; (ii) the relative fossil energy carrying states in China and the United States are different, mainly reflected in the economy and environment; (iii) the gap in RFECC between China and the United States has gradually widened; in general, China’s economic RFECC is better than that of the United States, while environmental RFECC and population RFECC in the United States is better than that of China; and (iv) coal and oil should be used as a breakthrough point for the sustainable fossil energy and sustainable development for China and the United States, respectively.
Based on resource carrying capacity, this study used the revised theory of relative resource carrying capacity (RRCC) and introduced an innovative concept of relative fossil energy carrying capacity (RFECC), which evaluates the degree of fossil energy sustainability based on the relationship between economy, population, and environment. This study took China and the United States as the study objects, took the whole country as the reference area, and calculated the RFECC of population, economic, and environmental resources from 2000 to 2018. Therefore, based on the comparative analysis, the following conclusions were drawn: (i) there is a big difference in the RFECC between China and the United States, which is manifested in the inverted U-shaped trend in China and the U-shaped trend in the United States; (ii) the relative fossil energy carrying states in China and the United States are different, mainly reflected in the economy and environment; (iii) the gap in RFECC between China and the United States has gradually widened; in general, China’s economic RFECC is better than that of the United States, while environmental RFECC and population RFECC in the United States is better than that of China; and (iv) coal and oil should be used as a breakthrough point for the sustainable fossil energy and sustainable development for China and the United States, respectively.
Record ID
Keywords
China, comparative analysis, relative fossil energy carrying capacity (RFECC), the United States
Subject
Suggested Citation
Zuo Z, Cheng J, Guo H, Li Y. Comparative Study on Relative Fossil Energy Carrying Capacity in China and the United States. (2023). LAPSE:2023.32423
Author Affiliations
Zuo Z: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Cheng J: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; Research Center of Resource and Environment Economics, Mineral Resource Strategy and Policy Research Center, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China [ORCID]
Guo H: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; Research Center of Resource and Environment Economics, Mineral Resource Strategy and Policy Research Center, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Li Y: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Cheng J: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; Research Center of Resource and Environment Economics, Mineral Resource Strategy and Policy Research Center, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China [ORCID]
Guo H: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; Research Center of Resource and Environment Economics, Mineral Resource Strategy and Policy Research Center, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Li Y: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
14
Issue
10
First Page
2972
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-05-20
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en14102972, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.32423
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102972
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
199
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 20, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 20, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.32423
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
