LAPSE:2023.14887
Published Article
LAPSE:2023.14887
Customer Perceived Risk Measurement with NLP Method in Electric Vehicles Consumption Market: Empirical Study from China
Tao Shu, Zhiyi Wang, Ling Lin, Huading Jia, Jixian Zhou
March 2, 2023
Abstract
In recent years, as people’s awareness of energy conservation, environmental protection, and sustainable development has increased, discussions related to electric vehicles (EVs) have aroused public debate on social media. At some point, most consumers face the possible risks of EVs—a critical psychological perception that invariably affects sales of EVs in the consumption market. This paper chooses to deconstruct customers’ perceived risk from third-party comment data in social media, which has better coverage and objectivity than questionnaire surveys. In order to analyze a large amount of unstructured text comment data, the natural language processing (NLP) method based on machine learning was applied in this paper. The measurement results show 15 abstracts in five consumer perceived risks to EVs. Among them, the largest number of comments is that of “Technology Maturity” (A13) which reached 25,329, and which belongs to the “Performance Risk” (PR1) dimension, indicating that customers are most concerned about the performance risk of EVs. Then, in the “Social Risk” (PR5) dimension, the abstract “Social Needs” (A51) received only 3224 comments and “Preference and Trust Rank” (A52) reached 22,324 comments; this noticeable gap indicated the changes in how consumers perceived EVs social risks. Moreover, each dimension’s emotion analysis results showed that negative emotions are more than 40%, exceeding neutral or positive emotions. Importantly, customers have the strongest negative emotions about the “Time Risk” (PR4), accounting for 54%. On a finer scale, the top three negative emotions are “Charging Time” (A42), “EV Charging Facilities” (A41), and “Maintenance of Value” (A33). Another interesting result is that “Social Needs” (A51)’s positive emotional comments were larger than negative emotional comments. The paper provides substantial evidence for perceived risk theory research by new data and methods. It can provide a novel tool for multi-dimensional and fine-granular capture customers’ perceived risks and negative emotions. Thus, it has the potential to help government and enterprises to adjust promotional strategies in a timely manner to reduce higher perceived risks and emotions, accelerating the sustainable development of EVs’ consumption market in China.
Keywords
consumption market, electric vehicles, emotion analysis, EVs, natural language processing, NLP, perceived risk, social media comment
Suggested Citation
Shu T, Wang Z, Lin L, Jia H, Zhou J. Customer Perceived Risk Measurement with NLP Method in Electric Vehicles Consumption Market: Empirical Study from China. (2023). LAPSE:2023.14887
Author Affiliations
Shu T: Department of Information Management and Information Systems, School of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
Wang Z: Department of Information Management and Information Systems, School of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
Lin L: Department of Information Management and Information Systems, School of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
Jia H: Department of Information Management and Information Systems, School of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
Zhou J: Department of Information Management and Information Systems, School of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
15
Issue
5
First Page
1637
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-02-22
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en15051637, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.14887
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15051637
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Mar 2, 2023
Main Article
License
CC BY 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
315
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Mar 2, 2023
 
Verified by curator on
Mar 2, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.14887
 
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
(0.19 seconds)

[0.2 s]