LAPSE:2023.1311
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.1311
Which Is an Appropriate Quadratic Rheological Model of Fresh Paste, the Modified Bingham Model or the Parabolic Model?
February 21, 2023
Abstract
The physical meaning and calculating process of the rheological parameters of two nonlinear rheological models, the parabolic model and the modified Bingham model, were compared. The fluidity test and a rheological experiment on cementitious materials were performed. The Couette inverse problem is a key issue in measuring and solving the rheological parameters of fresh cementitious materials. The solution of the Couette inverse problem based on the modified Bingham model is discontinuous when the coefficient of the quadratic term is equal to zero, resulting in a large deviation between the fitting curve and the rheological experimental data. The credibility of the rheological parameters of the pastes calculated based on the modified Bingham model is low. The formulas for calculating yield stress, fiducial differential viscosity and the degree of shear thickening or shear thinning of the parabolic model have been developed. The credibility of the rheological parameters of the pastes calculated based on the parabolic model is high. The flow performance of the paste can be clearly characterized by the rheological parameters calculated with the parabolic model.
The physical meaning and calculating process of the rheological parameters of two nonlinear rheological models, the parabolic model and the modified Bingham model, were compared. The fluidity test and a rheological experiment on cementitious materials were performed. The Couette inverse problem is a key issue in measuring and solving the rheological parameters of fresh cementitious materials. The solution of the Couette inverse problem based on the modified Bingham model is discontinuous when the coefficient of the quadratic term is equal to zero, resulting in a large deviation between the fitting curve and the rheological experimental data. The credibility of the rheological parameters of the pastes calculated based on the modified Bingham model is low. The formulas for calculating yield stress, fiducial differential viscosity and the degree of shear thickening or shear thinning of the parabolic model have been developed. The credibility of the rheological parameters of the pastes calculated based on the parabolic model is high. The flow performance of the paste can be clearly characterized by the rheological parameters calculated with the parabolic model.
Record ID
Keywords
cementitious materials, fresh paste, modified Bingham model, parabolic model, rheological parameter, the Couette inverse problem
Subject
Suggested Citation
Li M, Yan P, Han J, Guo L. Which Is an Appropriate Quadratic Rheological Model of Fresh Paste, the Modified Bingham Model or the Parabolic Model?. (2023). LAPSE:2023.1311
Author Affiliations
Li M: BGRIMM Technology Group, Beijing 100160, China; Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; National Centre for International Research on Green Metal Mining, Beijing 102628, China
Yan P: Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China [ORCID]
Han J: Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Guo L: BGRIMM Technology Group, Beijing 100160, China; National Centre for International Research on Green Metal Mining, Beijing 102628, China [ORCID]
Yan P: Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China [ORCID]
Han J: Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Guo L: BGRIMM Technology Group, Beijing 100160, China; National Centre for International Research on Green Metal Mining, Beijing 102628, China [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
10
Issue
12
First Page
2603
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-12-05
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr10122603, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.1311
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122603
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
266
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 21, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 21, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.1311
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
[0.07 s]
