LAPSE:2023.0837
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.0837
The Influence of Reservoir Clay Composition on Heavy Oil In Situ Combustion
February 21, 2023
Abstract
Thermally enhanced oil recovery methods, such as in situ combustion and steam injection, are generating considerable interest in terms of improving oil reserve exploitation and satisfying oil demand and economic growth. However, the early breakthrough of the in situ combustion front and the significant amount of heat loss associated with steam injection for deeper reservoir applications are the main challenges that require urgent solutions. Further data collection related to the effects of a reservoir’s physical and chemical properties, temperature, and pressure on in situ combustion front propagation and steam injection heat transfer inefficiency would be needed to achieve better reservoir oil recovery. Most studies have focused on the application of catalytic systems and the investigation of minerals’ effects on combustion front stabilization; however, the effect of clay interlayers’ minerals on the performance of in situ combustion is still poorly understood. This paper takes a new look at the role played by the interlayers’ minerals in stabilizing the combustion front using X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry (TG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) combined with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and combustion tube experiments. The studied samples’ compositions were analyzed by XRD, TG/DSC, and NMR techniques. Meanwhile, the effects of interlayers’ minerals on oil production were screened by combustion tube experiments. The data obtained from this study suggest that clay dispersion within a reservoir would improve oil recovery via in situ combustion, and our study led us to obtain an 80.5% recovery factor. However, the experiments of models with clay interlayers showed less recovery factors, and the model with interlayers led to a 0% recovery factor in the presence of air injection. Meanwhile, the same model in hydrothermal and air injection conditions led to a 13.9% recovery factor. This was due to the hydrothermal effect improving permeability and pore enlargement, which allowed the transfer of heat and matter. Moreover, our study found that clay minerals exhibit excellent catalytic effects on the formation of fuel deposition and the coke oxidation process. This effect was reflected in the significant role played by clay minerals in decreasing the number of heteroatoms by breaking down the C-S, C-N, and C-O bonds and by stimulating the processes of hydrocarbon polymerization during the in situ combustion. Our results add to a growing body of literature related to in situ combustion challenges and underline the importance of a reservoir’s physical parameters in the successful application of in situ combustion.
Thermally enhanced oil recovery methods, such as in situ combustion and steam injection, are generating considerable interest in terms of improving oil reserve exploitation and satisfying oil demand and economic growth. However, the early breakthrough of the in situ combustion front and the significant amount of heat loss associated with steam injection for deeper reservoir applications are the main challenges that require urgent solutions. Further data collection related to the effects of a reservoir’s physical and chemical properties, temperature, and pressure on in situ combustion front propagation and steam injection heat transfer inefficiency would be needed to achieve better reservoir oil recovery. Most studies have focused on the application of catalytic systems and the investigation of minerals’ effects on combustion front stabilization; however, the effect of clay interlayers’ minerals on the performance of in situ combustion is still poorly understood. This paper takes a new look at the role played by the interlayers’ minerals in stabilizing the combustion front using X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry (TG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) combined with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and combustion tube experiments. The studied samples’ compositions were analyzed by XRD, TG/DSC, and NMR techniques. Meanwhile, the effects of interlayers’ minerals on oil production were screened by combustion tube experiments. The data obtained from this study suggest that clay dispersion within a reservoir would improve oil recovery via in situ combustion, and our study led us to obtain an 80.5% recovery factor. However, the experiments of models with clay interlayers showed less recovery factors, and the model with interlayers led to a 0% recovery factor in the presence of air injection. Meanwhile, the same model in hydrothermal and air injection conditions led to a 13.9% recovery factor. This was due to the hydrothermal effect improving permeability and pore enlargement, which allowed the transfer of heat and matter. Moreover, our study found that clay minerals exhibit excellent catalytic effects on the formation of fuel deposition and the coke oxidation process. This effect was reflected in the significant role played by clay minerals in decreasing the number of heteroatoms by breaking down the C-S, C-N, and C-O bonds and by stimulating the processes of hydrocarbon polymerization during the in situ combustion. Our results add to a growing body of literature related to in situ combustion challenges and underline the importance of a reservoir’s physical parameters in the successful application of in situ combustion.
Record ID
Keywords
clays, combustion tube, heavy oil, in situ combustion, permeability, steam injection, thermal analysis
Subject
Suggested Citation
Minkhanov IF, Bolotov AV, Tazeev AR, Chalin VV, Kacou AFD, Galeev RI, Sagirov RN, Al-Muntaser AA, Emelianov DA, Khelkhal MA, Varfolomeev MA. The Influence of Reservoir Clay Composition on Heavy Oil In Situ Combustion. (2023). LAPSE:2023.0837
Author Affiliations
Minkhanov IF: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Bolotov AV: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Tazeev AR: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Chalin VV: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Kacou AFD: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Galeev RI: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Sagirov RN: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Al-Muntaser AA: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Emelianov DA: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia; Department of Physical Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia [ORCID]
Khelkhal MA: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia [ORCID]
Varfolomeev MA: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia [ORCID]
Bolotov AV: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Tazeev AR: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Chalin VV: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Kacou AFD: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Galeev RI: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Sagirov RN: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Al-Muntaser AA: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia
Emelianov DA: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia; Department of Physical Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia [ORCID]
Khelkhal MA: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia [ORCID]
Varfolomeev MA: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
10
Issue
11
First Page
2308
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-11-06
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr10112308, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.0837
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112308
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
341
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 21, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 21, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.0837
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
